2. Old jobs lost
Lost because of the worldwide Covid pandemic caused by the Wuhan lab leak, which was covered up by the CCP, WHO, and useful fools and tools like yourself.
Is this a game you like to play or are you really this stupid???
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
2. Old jobs lost
The federal and state Unemployment Compensation Divisions and the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics say differently. Lying idiot.But they got their jobs back right?
So Joe didn't create shit, people just went back to work.
So instead of your orange jesus having a negative 3 million jobs record, he has a negative 17 million jobs record.Lost because of the worldwide Covid pandemic caused by the Wuhan lab leak, which was covered up by the CCP, WHO, and useful fools and tools like yourself.
Is this a game you like to play or are you really this stupid???
So instead of your orange jesus having a negative 3 million jobs record, he has a negative 17 million jobs record.
So which is it are people going back to work or not?The federal and state Unemployment Compensation Divisions and the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics say differently. Lying idiot.
No, you're the lying trumptard idiot.So, you really are that stupid. Got it.
Historical government FACT....NEGATIVE 3 million jobs for your orange jesus.So which is it are people going back to work or not?
I think the real reason he dropped out of school was that they probably canceled the special needs programs at his school.So, you really are that stupid. Got it.
You're a lying idiot.I think the real reason he dropped out of school was that they probably canceled the special needs programs at his school.
Perhaps we should give him a break.
Because SUPPLY SIDE'S FAILURE to produce enough products and corporate greed in raising profit margins while making record high profits.If Biden created so many jobs, why is there a supply side failure??
You're a lying idiot.Thread is on 2nd page, and I can't get a straight answer out of greed. All I'm getting are those repetitive lies.
Ok extra special needsYou're a lying idiot.
Might want to redo the math on that one.Yes, so if the average class size is 23 kids (ha) odds are one will end up being gay.
Liberal math has never been very good.Might want to redo the math on that one.
What in the world do you think those two things have to do with each other?Hmmm, haven't you been an advocate of each vote counting equally???
So why should one "vote" have more importance than the twenty-two others???
How about the schools teach reading, writing, math, etc and keep the social engineering crap out of of it. Problem solved.What in the world do you think those two things have to do with each other?
This issue is getting massively polarized (by everyone) and really shouldn’t be. I wish it were possible to have a conversation about what is age appropriate, and whether this is something that should be handled by school boards or state legislatures. At this point it seems practically impossible to even figure out what specific things were being taught that the authors of the bill want to end.
What in the world do you think those two things have to do with each other?
I really don’t. Greater voices than what? “Any voice whatsoever” isn’t more than they deserve.You have consistently said each vote should count equally and that voters in smaller states have a greater voice. Yet you also seem to consistently suggest minorities (whether racial, sexual, otherwise) should have greater voices. You really don't see what those two things have to do with each other?
Notice you didn’t put the one where this type of thing becomes more relevant, history. Trying to remove that from the curriculum?How about the schools teach reading, writing, math, etc and keep the social engineering crap out of of it. Problem solved.
Let's put it another way. Who should have a greater voice in these kids' education? Social activists that make up a small percentage of the population or the actual parents of the large majority of the students?I really don’t. Greater voices than what? “Any voice whatsoever” isn’t more than they deserve.
That's because libs keep talking about the crap. Useless crap and they don't just teach it from historical perspective. They try to brainwash the mush brain kids with indoctrination.Notice you didn’t put the one where this type of thing becomes more relevant, history. Trying to remove that from the curriculum?
Blah blah blah you’re just repeating drivel and not saying anything of substance. You’ll get pats on the back from rox and convince absolutely no one new to your cause.That's because libs keep talking about the crap. Useless crap and they don't just teach it from historical perspective. They try to brainwash the mush brain kids with indoctrination.
Why does a K-3(or whatever) need to be taught about men trying to be women in a public school?Blah blah blah you’re just repeating drivel and not saying anything of substance. You’ll get pats on the back from rox and convince absolutely no one new to your cause.
I’d say the locally democratically elected school board most of the time. But I’m not fundamentally opposed to “guard rail” type legislation that keeps them from going too off track. I may not even be opposed to what Florida is doing, except I can’t cut through all the partisan nonsense to find out 1) What specific problems it was supposed to address and 2) What actually would and wouldn’t be allowed under the new law.Let's put it another way. Who should have a greater voice in these kids' education? Social activists that make up a small percentage of the population or the actual parents of the large majority of the students?
Because it’s a stupid trap question designed to give sound bites for them to harp on.Why does a K-3(or whatever) need to be taught about men trying to be women in a public school?
A woman who is going to be on the Supreme Court with umpteen years of education and experience won't even say what a woman is. Why?
Notice you didn’t put the one where this type of thing becomes more relevant, history. Trying to remove that from the curriculum?
I’d say the locally democratically elected school board most of the time. But I’m not fundamentally opposed to “guard rail” type legislation that keeps them from going too off track. I may not even be opposed to what Florida is doing, except I can’t cut through all the partisan nonsense to find out 1) What specific problems it was supposed to address and 2) What actually would and wouldn’t be allowed under the new law.
But, back to my original point, what were K-3 kids being taught about trans/gay people in the first place that necessitated this law?
Were they?Why were pre-pubescant children being taught about this at all??? And stealthily??? And against the wishes of a significant number of parents???
Couldn't have described the liberal causes better myselfBlah blah blah you’re just repeating drivel and not saying anything of substance. You’ll get pats on the back from rox and convince absolutely no one new to your cause.
what were K-3 kids
Were they?