You did? You listed Georgia State, Southern Miss, UNLV, Kent State, UTSA.
The hole in your attempt is that a quarterback is the only factor that decides a conference championship. Though a big part of a team's success, it isn't all of it.
You could have put Tua on UTSA, and they wouldn't have won the conference. You could have put Jordan Ta'amu (one of the two best JUCO QBs) last year on UTEP and they wouldn't have won the conference.
Marshall had the best defense, by far, in the division. They had a solid running offense. What they didn't have was either a good running QB to make their running attack lethal or a good passing game. If they had either of those, they play in the conference championship.
Of the G5 schools that I listed, all of them other than the UTSA QB would have been as good or better than what Marshall rolled out there this year. Some of them would have been far better for the offense.
How did their teams do? Did they win their conferences?
.
As I explained, you could have put Tua on UTSA, and they wouldn't have won. Your argument that "those other teams didn't win the conference with those other JUCO QBs proves my point" is illogical. Those other teams don't have the talent advantage compared to the rest of the conference that Marshall has over most of the C-USA teams have.
Kent State wasn't winning the MAC with anyone at QB. UTSA wasn't winning C-USA with anyone at QB.
So you just assume that IF they played at Marshall they would be better than what we have now
Uhh, yeah? Abraham's passing coupled with Marshall's running ability would have greatly improved the offense. Woody Barrett's overall game would have caused fits for defenses, because they'd have to account for the best athlete on the field having the ball in his hands every play.
It isn't an outlandish assumption. If you have a better QB, it usually means the team will be better.
IF Tua played at Marshall, he would be better than what Marshall has now. If Abraham played at Marshall, he would be better than what Marshall has now.
I said G5 staring QBs that won their conference title and preferably in their first year.
And again, your attempt at logic doesn't work as I've already gone over.
Once again the assumption made by the poster was that bringing in a JUCO would make this team better and the only acceptable better according to posts is to win the conference.
.
If you get the right QB, a JUCO could easily improve Marshall. Why is that so hard for you to fathom?
Does taking any JUCO QB mean a team will win their conference? Of course not. However, in Marshall's case, taking a better JUCO QB (Abraham, Woody, etc.) would have led them to the title game since the rest of their team was strong enough to get there. That wasn't the case, regardless of who was at QB, for most of those other teams.
Just saying "Well if this guy played here we'd be better," is a straw man argument.
.
What? You clearly have no idea what a straw man argument is. Don't use phrases that you don't know what the meaning is. It makes you look dumber than your failed argument does.