That's not a direct quote from Huff, though.Then he should have said that instead of "the timing just isn't right."
That's a source telling another source what "happened."
That's not a direct quote from Huff, though.Then he should have said that instead of "the timing just isn't right."
We dont even know what the "interview" even consisted of and we have fans wanting apologies. Jesus F'ing Christ. We dont even know the quote "not the right time" is Huffs.Because he isn't qualified. Not because he has any loyalty to the program.
Don't get me wrong, I don't think loyalty really exists these days, and I don't want a coach who plans to just stick around here forever. That only happens with duds like Holliday and Snyder. But I do expect a coach to have the decency to stick around long enough to make some improvements in the W-L columns before getting the fvck outta Dodge.
agree, and so far he hasn't put up any better record than Doc. Maybe next year.......Because he isn't qualified. Not because he has any loyalty to the program.
Don't get me wrong, I don't think loyalty really exists these days, and I don't want a coach who plans to just stick around here forever. That only happens with duds like Holliday and Snyder. But I do expect a coach to have the decency to stick around long enough to make some improvements in the W-L columns before getting the fvck outta Dodge.
This is laughable. Cut the shit man; you are a very sharp dude and one of the better posters on here. What the fvck do you think the interview was about? Huff just wanted ask to what pressure do they inflate their footballs?We dont even know what the "interview" even consisted of and we have fans wanting apologies. Jesus F'ing Christ. We dont even know the quote "not the right time" is Huffs.
Bullshit. Doc's first 3 years were losing seasons. Didn't start winning until CUSA got watered down.agree, and so far he hasn't put up any better record than Doc. Maybe next year.......
Uhh, that doesn't help your argument. I couldn't stand Doc, but Huff is in the same watered down version of CUSA. Hell, it's debatable as to whether Huff's version at this point is even more diluted than Doc's.Bullshit. Doc's first 3 years were losing seasons. Didn't start winning until CUSA got watered down.
Here is a Scenario based on RUMOR:This is laughable. Cut the shit man; you are a very sharp dude and one of the better posters on here. What the fvck do you think the interview was about? Huff just wanted ask to what pressure do they inflate their footballs?
Uhh, that doesn't help your argument. I couldn't stand Doc, but Huff is in the same watered down version of CUSA. Hell, it's debatable as to whether Huff's version at this point is even more diluted than Doc's.
This.Huff was never seriously considered a candidate for that job. From what I know not sure he was formally interviewed. As always there was a lot of bad information and diversions in play.
This post right here explains the situation perfectly.Duke knew who they wanted for the job. That is widely reported.
Now think about this guys. They have to interview so many people or go through the motions. They are a large organization, most of you know the deal.
It could have been just a feeler or Huff checks a few boxes on that list when hiring someone at a large school. You can draw your own conclusions. But, damn he worked for the greatest coach of all time is one of those. Some of your way over playing this. If Duke or some school hires him that is their business but, from everything I have read around the Duke job, they knew exactly who they wanted and it was wrapped up pretty quickly.
Doc year one 5-7agree, and so far he hasn't put up any better record than Doc. Maybe next year.......
except his second year he won a bowl and had winning record but what you said does make a better point.Bullshit. Doc's first 3 years were losing seasons. Didn't start winning until CUSA got watered down.
I was referring to the previous seasons. A 7-5 season most years is what got Doc fired. For the record , Doc played #2 Ohio State and #23 WVU out of conference that year (2010). That was in addition to a much harder C-USA. Finally, he followed Mark (23-37) which had been fired for losing year after year. Huff took over a team that played in the conference championship and returned the majority of starters for what it is worth.Doc year one 5-7
Huff year one 7-5
There you go, confusing the Doc-obsessed with facts and logic. In their delusional world, a 7-5 not Doc coach is a candidate for great P5 jobs like VPI, Duke and I even saw one post on Facebook about Virginia. And, of course, in their delusion, all of the failings of CH, are excused away to the supposed “dumpster fire” left behind by last year’s division championship winner. Of course, in the real world, we underperformed this year and no one associated with the team, certainly not its head coach deserved, or actually got, a sniff from anyone else; and a “dumpster fire” is what the new coaches at places like FIU, Akron, New Mexico State, got. Losing teams. Not returning division champions.I was referring to the previous seasons. A 7-5 season most years is what got Doc fired. For the record , Doc played #2 Ohio State and #23 WVU out of conference that year (2010). That was in addition to a much harder C-USA. Finally, he followed Mark (23-37) which had been fired for losing year after year. Huff took over a team that played in the conference championship and returned the majority of starters for what it is worth.
You’re dumb if you don’t think an extra 12 million dollars GUARANTEED over a probable 4 year contract wouldn’t talk to most people.Then you're dumb. You can't win at Duke and you'd be out in under 5 years. At Bama you can get the best recruits, best money, and win giving your career mire longevity thus making more money.
Chasing a salary isn't the smartest move. Unless all you care about is a short term payout.
Well ****, we should have kept Doc. Mediocrity for 11 years is good for Marshall fans.There you go, confusing the Doc-obsessed with facts and logic. In their delusional world, a 7-5 not Doc coach is a candidate for great P5 jobs like VPI, Duke and I even saw one post on Facebook about Virginia. And, of course, in their delusion, all of the failings of CH, are excused away to the supposed “dumpster fire” left behind by last year’s division championship winner. Of course, in the real world, we underperformed this year and no one associated with the team, certainly not its head coach deserved, or actually got, a sniff from anyone else; and a “dumpster fire” is what the new coaches at places like FIU, Akron, New Mexico State, got. Losing teams. Not returning division champions.
One has to wonder when CH will be judged on his own merits, without an amen chorus of Doc obsessed excuse makers.
I'm thinking year 4. I'm also willing to use the "young team" excuse for a couple more years.One has to wonder when CH will be judged on his own merits, without an amen chorus of Doc obsessed excuse makers
We cant talk about the past. Take this to the "history" thread. Right Sammy?I was referring to the previous seasons. A 7-5 season most years is what got Doc fired. For the record , Doc played #2 Ohio State and #23 WVU out of conference that year (2010). That was in addition to a much harder C-USA. Finally, he followed Mark (23-37) which had been fired for losing year after year. Huff took over a team that played in the conference championship and returned the majority of starters for what it is worth.
exactly.Some of you guys need to calm down... Huff is going to be a "candidate" for jobs every year that we have a winning record.
He has had success as an assistant/recruiter at multiple P5 programs.
He has a winning record as a head coach (albeit 7-5 in one season).
He is very very marketable to fanbases. Says all the right things, good with the media, etc
At least you admit it. So, “year four” is 2024. Look forward to the end of you obsession with the past and you can join the adults in discussion about MU football. Perhaps by then we will have a coach that can beat teams with winning records.I'm thinking year 4. I'm also willing to use the "young team" excuse for a couple more years.
ALL you do, by your own admission, is talk about the past. As I have informed you, we get it. You have not desire (perhaps not the ability) to discuss current MU football. You state so above. If you wish to waste your time for the next three or four year with endless screeds about the past, then waste it. No one cares. We will be discussing the current coach. 7-5. 6-5 vs. I-A. 0-4 vs. teams with winning records. Picked to win division, failed. Absolutely manhandled multiple times. Embarrassed multiple times.We cant talk about the past. Take this to the "history" thread. Right Sammy?
At least you admit it.
Perhaps by then we will have a coach that can beat teams with winning records.
Clearly I was joking. "young team" should have been a clue. You losers used it for "4 years".So, “year four” is 2024
You keep making these ignorant generalizations Sammy. Every thread is a discussion about the present. EVERY. You just dont like to read it because it demonstrates YOUR continual hypocrisy. Thats why you respond. You cant stand being called out.ALL you do, by your own admission, is talk about the past.
Why the change?No excuses needed or desired.
Duke has played in 6 bowl games over the past 10 years. Our 7-5 record isn’t setting the world on fire in our crappy conference. https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/schools/duke/index.htmlThen you're dumb. You can't win at Duke and you'd be out in under 5 years. At Bama you can get the best recruits, best money, and win giving your career mire longevity thus making more money.
Chasing a salary isn't the smartest move. Unless all you care about is a short term payout.
It's still a bad job and if I were a coach with my sights higher I would not take that job. I would raise my profile more here and then wait on a better job. Duke is a basketball school. If Huff wins one championship here over the next two seasons his name will vault to the top of a lot of short lists.Duke has played in 6 bowl games over the past 10 years. Our 7-5 record isn’t setting the world on fire in our crappy conference. https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/schools/duke/index.html
Hard to define any job that pays $3 million a year a "bad" job... Plus, at Duke you have very low fan expectations. You can survive a bad stretch as long as there is hope for the future... Good luck surviving a bad couple seasons in the SEC or Big10.It's still a bad job and if I were a coach with my sights higher I would not take that job. I would raise my profile more here and then wait on a better job. Duke is a basketball school. If Huff wins one championship here over the next two seasons his name will vault to the top of a lot of short lists.
I've been happy where I've been for a long time. I still talked to others about potential opportunities.that may be the case, but it makes no sense whatsoever to interview at Duke if he is happy here.
OK, exactly how many. Just asking when the childish screeds about the past will end and you will join us in a discussion of the current team and the current coach.Admit I'm going to give a coach more than a season unlike some who already have quit.
Clearly I was joking. "young team" should have been a clue. You losers used it for "4 years".
Yes. We adults discuss the present. This team. This coach. The underperformance, the beatdowns, the embarassing losses. YOU, and pretty much only you, “contribute” screeds about the past.Every thread is a discussion about the present.
You just cant stop lying can you. How about you just post, "L" for loser. Based on the type of responses you receive, I'm not the only one that feels that way. Save us all some time.Yes. We adults discuss the present. This team. This coach. The underperformance, the beatdowns, the embarassing losses. YOU, and pretty much only you, “contribute” screeds about the past.
Tell you what, since you respond the same way to every post, just post the letter “D” as your reply in all these threads. We will know it is your standard ramble of excuse making and obsession with the past, and might free up your time
This is why your opinions dont count for much. I dont think anyone here actually believes this year's performance actually qualified him for the job switch. Please point to a post that says just that.It just that the fantasy that his single underperforming year somehow qualified him for a job elsewhere
5-7Bullshit. Doc's first 3 years were losing seasons. Didn't start winning until CUSA got watered down.
I believe "Doc" is the guy you latched onto, continue to latch onto, and won't let go. Nothing Huff ever does will satisfy you.Who is this “Doc”?
This is a thread about whether or not Duke was stupid enough to actually consider a 7-5 underperforming coach after one year for a P5 job, even one a bad as Duke. The previous coach is not relevant at all, except for the fact that the team was picked to repeat as division champions this year, and its failure to do so is part of the underperformance. But a very small part. The season stands on its own, more or less. 7-5. 6-5 vs. I-A. 0-4 vs. teams with winning records. Etc.
Apparently Duke wasn’t that stupid. Kuddos to Duke.
You need to learn the difference between “lying” and “says true things I wish weren’t true”.You just cant stop lying can you.
How about the entire theme of the thread?I dont think anyone here actually believes this year's performance actually qualified him for the job switch. Please point to a post that says just that.