ADVERTISEMENT

Huff's Extension

BleedsGreen33

Platinum Buffalo
Gold Member
Jan 25, 2010
40,454
26,882
113
What is the bare minimum Huff would need to accomplish for you to not just accept, but be happy with him receiving an extension?
 
I say he gets one more year with 5 wins. Not saying I agree just believe that will be the case
 
We hired him because Doc wasn’t winning championships. We had a coach that won 8 games a year and fired him.

We are in a better conference now, but Huff was also hired to be better, which means he has to be as good in a stronger conference as Doc was in a weaker conference. He needs to win at least 8 games.
 
We hired him because Doc wasn’t winning championships. We had a coach that won 8 games a year and fired him.

We are in a better conference now, but Huff was also hired to be better, which means he has to be as good in a stronger conference as Doc was in a weaker conference. He needs to win at least 8 games.
Doc didn’t coach in the SBC?
 
Win 8+ to get the extension.. no vacation time this year, he has put a lot of effort into this season, he knows what’s on the line. I like the guy but he needs wins…
 
  • Like
Reactions: herdinmichigan
Frankly, I think it would be best for all involved to start a total redo with a new HC in 2025. Hope we have a great season this fall but not seeing more than 6 wins at this point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BleedsGreen33
Yeap… in my opinion!

Must start winning conference if we wanna see growth in fans and level of competition.
Notre dame and VT wins were fun and great for the short term health of the program. But finishing as champions against your peers is always the ultimate goal.
 
So Huff can beat OSU and Va Tech. Lose 2 conference games ( yes he’s capable) don’t make the playoffs and no extension?
Yes. Because the object is to win our conference. At least be in there neck and neck.

Winning at ND lost it's luster as soon as we lost to BGSU and started tumbling in conference play.

Awesome wins, but at the end of the day it's about championships.

Ask youself which scenario is more disappointing.

Losing to your P5(s), but winning your conference championship.

OR

Beating your P5(s), but finishing middle to bottom of your conference.

In the first scenario the season is celebrated and in the second scenario you quickly start the season as a wasted opportunity just like 2022 turned out to be and last year was the same.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sluggo72
- What ifs about pulling off massive upsets but then losing conference games are pointless. This isn't going to happen. Yes, Notre Dame, but Ohio State is 1000 times better than Notre Dame.

- This season seems to be pretty clear. This is a bad coach, with bad players. But we are playing a very weak schedule. Very weak. It looks like 6-6 is very doable.

Then we see. Does non-leader CS get this joker out of here, or is this, like basketball, just a token effort.

My bet is on standing pat. It is what non-leaders do.
 
- What ifs about pulling off massive upsets but then losing conference games are pointless. This isn't going to happen. Yes, Notre Dame, but Ohio State is 1000 times better than Notre Dame.

- This season seems to be pretty clear. This is a bad coach, with bad players. But we are playing a very weak schedule. Very weak. It looks like 6-6 is very doable.

Then we see. Does non-leader CS get this joker out of here, or is this, like basketball, just a token effort.

My bet is on standing pat. It is what non-leaders do.
So Brad is a non-leader? He ultimately makes the call. Seems to be doing damn good job so far.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sluggo72
So Brad is a non-leader? He ultimately makes the call. Seems to be doing damn good job so far.
If a university president spends 1% of his time on the athletic department, he is not doing his job. Running MU is, after governor, the most important job in the state. MU is this state's last and best hope, and BS is doing a GREAT job so far (it is about to get much harder went the governor changes). Great job.

CS, however, is not a leader. How do we know that? By the name on the door at the head football coach's office.
 
If a university president spends 1% of his time on the athletic department, he is not doing his job. Running MU is, after governor, the most important job in the state. MU is this state's last and best hope, and BS is doing a GREAT job so far (it is about to get much harder went the governor changes). Great job.

CS, however, is not a leader. How do we know that? By the name on the door at the head football coach's office.
But the prez calls the shots in hiring and firing . Brad certainly has more important tasks to focus on but the buck stops with him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W-S HerdFan
If a university president spends 1% of his time on the athletic department, he is not doing his job. Running MU is, after governor, the most important job in the state. MU is this state's last and best hope, and BS is doing a GREAT job so far (it is about to get much harder went the governor changes). Great job.

CS, however, is not a leader. How do we know that? By the name on the door at the head football coach's office.
And another instance that Sam has been out of touch with college athletics for at least the last 10 years
 
  • Like
Reactions: raleighherdfan
complete bullshit sammy.
Spamite troll.

At least TRY to have a take. Writing "NOT EITHER" is not a take.

So tell us, troll, how much time does a university president (mine being Smith, yours being Gee, soon to be Manchin, whoever) spend on sports? And who runs the actual functions of the large business that a major university is, while he is worrying about sports?

What an idiot you are.
 
If a university president spends 1% of his time on the athletic department, he is not doing his job.
You say a lot of stupid things, including multiple ones in this thread, but this one may be the dumbest.

A university president, much like a CEO, has leaders of each department. Those department leaders report to the C-level suite (in this case, the university president). A good leader is staying very engaged with each of those leaders to be able to support, assess, and help guide those leaders. In doing so, it means that CEO/COO/university president is spending the majority of his/her time engaged with each of those departments. So if a university president is only spending 1% of their time on the athletic department - especially at the D1 level - they are not fulfilling their own role.

Running MU is, after governor, the most important job in the state. MU is this state's last and best hope,
You really are a moron.
 
Spamite troll.

At least TRY to have a take. Writing "NOT EITHER" is not a take.

So tell us, troll, how much time does a university president (mine being Smith, yours being Gee, soon to be Manchin, whoever) spend on sports? And who runs the actual functions of the large business that a major university is, while he is worrying about sports?

What an idiot you are.
Looks like your take is being mocked, not just by me, Sammy. Your "1% of time" take is stupid and misinformed. Shows just how much you dont know about leadership. "Sports" is a large revenue driver within the large business of a university. The President of the University spends a good portion of time involved with the leadership in those departments.

Also, try harder with your "spamite troll" schtick. It's stale and stupid as well. How many times do we need to prove you wrong about that too.
 
If we win 8 games he will be extended without question... If we are 5-7 or worse, he should be gone.

If we win 6 or 7 games, in my mind it will come down to how we look on the field.

If we go 6-6 or 7-5 and we are competitive in all of our games (with the exception of OSU who is going to beat us by 40) then it will be real interesting to see what happens.

As for Brad, Sam is overselling his point but not by much... Brad Smith is running a university and by pretty much all accounts doing a good job. Athletics is just one department within that business, and I don't think he intervenes in that department unless something is really really haywire... Could Brad go over Spears head and fire a coach if he thought a change was needed, sure... Would he do that? - IMO, only if it was exceedingly clear that a change needed made (and if Spears wouldn't make it).

As much as we are judging Huff on this season, the jury is still very much out on Spears at this point too. He's been here long enough to be making progress in the revenue sports (football and mens hoops), and so far we've had the DD debacle that has left basketball in the hands of Coach Jackson, and we have Huff on a very clear hot seat.
 
Yes. Because the object is to win our conference. At least be in there neck and neck.

Winning at ND lost it's luster as soon as we lost to BGSU and started tumbling in conference play.

Awesome wins, but at the end of the day it's about championships.

Ask youself which scenario is more disappointing.

Losing to your P5(s), but winning your conference championship.

OR

Beating your P5(s), but finishing middle to bottom of your conference.

In the first scenario the season is celebrated and in the second scenario you quickly start the season as a wasted opportunity just like 2022 turned out to be and last year was the same.
Sooooo, in a decade as a HC, Danny D'Antoni got ONE conference championship, and ONE historic (NCAA) win, and both were in the SAME Season. NEVER won either in the OTHER NINE SEASONS!!! Also, NEVER WON A GAME over a MAJOR FOE in that 10 Season span!!!''

Wonder if was "all about championships" in HERD basketball?????

Verrrrrrrrrrrrrrrry Interesting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
If we win 8 games he will be extended without question... If we are 5-7 or worse, he should be gone.

If we win 6 or 7 games, in my mind it will come down to how we look on the field.

If we go 6-6 or 7-5 and we are competitive in all of our games (with the exception of OSU who is going to beat us by 40) then it will be real interesting to see what happens.

As for Brad, Sam is overselling his point but not by much... Brad Smith is running a university and by pretty much all accounts doing a good job. Athletics is just one department within that business, and I don't think he intervenes in that department unless something is really really haywire... Could Brad go over Spears head and fire a coach if he thought a change was needed, sure... Would he do that? - IMO, only if it was exceedingly clear that a change needed made (and if Spears wouldn't make it).

As much as we are judging Huff on this season, the jury is still very much out on Spears at this point too. He's been here long enough to be making progress in the revenue sports (football and mens hoops), and so far we've had the DD debacle that has left basketball in the hands of Coach Jackson, and we have Huff on a very clear hot seat.
Here’s the thing you act as though the AD CS has the say over the HFC, he doesn’t other than get his coffee in the AM. The HFC answers to the president, here at Marshall and many other schools, they don’t answer to the Athletic Director. It’s been that way at MU since at least BP
 
  • Like
Reactions: W-S HerdFan
Your "1% of time" take is stupid and misinformed. Sthat too.
Spamite troll.

I notice you did not answer the question.

Just like you NEVER actually post anything about Marshall athletics. Just personal insults aimed at me, and a few others here.

Because you are a Spamite, not a Marshall fan.

Go away.
 
I notice you did not answer the question
I did. You're just too stupid to understand. I will do it again.
"Sports" is a large revenue driver within the large business of a university. The President of the University spends a good portion of time involved with the leadership in those departments.
Just like you NEVER actually post anything about Marshall athletics
You should read more. I post often about Marshall sports directly with many posters here. Primarily football season, because as I've stated multiple times, grew up in Htgn watching and cheering for the Herd for decades. Again, try harder. Your schtick is dumb.
 
I did. You're just too stupid to understand. I will do it again.


You should read more. I post often about Marshall sports directly with many posters here. Primarily football season, because as I've stated multiple times, grew up in Htgn watching and cheering for the Herd for decades. Again, try harder. Your schtick is dumb.
Link please.

All of your posts are just personal insults aimed at me and a few other Marshall fans. You never discuss actual Marshall athletics. Just yelling "NOT EITHER" to what other people say.

Which is not surprising. You are not a Marshall fan.

I really do not understand. "Rifle" is mentally ill. He deserves our pity, and our help. With treatment, he could be a productive member of society. He, while he deserves some blame for refusing care, cannot really help that he is mentally defective. It is a condition. You, on the other hand, seem fine. You are just a small little person, a keyboard warrior with nothing of merit to say beyond trying to make fun of people that care about a subject you do not.

Go away.
 
Yes. Because the object is to win our conference. At least be in there neck and neck.

Winning at ND lost it's luster as soon as we lost to BGSU and started tumbling in conference play.

Awesome wins, but at the end of the day it's about championships.

Ask youself which scenario is more disappointing.

Losing to your P5(s), but winning your conference championship.

OR

Beating your P5(s), but finishing middle to bottom of your conference.

In the first scenario the season is celebrated and in the second scenario you quickly start the season as a wasted opportunity just like 2022 turned out to be and last year was the same.
Same with VT. Had we won conference each year we’d have had a shot at access bowl. Instead we barely make a bowl
 
  • Like
Reactions: BleedsGreen33
Link please.

All of your posts are just personal insults aimed at me and a few other Marshall fans. You never discuss actual Marshall athletics. Just yelling "NOT EITHER" to what other people say.

Which is not surprising. You are not a Marshall fan.
It's '429. He tries to be a contrarian about everything.

The fact is, I attended almost all the games here in Cary during that final 2 weeks. You couldn't tell me UNC, Indiana, Georgtown, etc were playing any different because it was a "pandemic". We beat the big boys of college soccer that year, straight up.

Rumors were that some players were complaining about issues on the team and the coach refused to address when asked to do so. Insubordination will get you fired every time.

Thats all you usually have. RUMORS. Mine at least came from the University.

I dont remember the university publishing rumors. But I admit not living in Htgn and seeing the news. My rumors came from inside the university from people I know and spoken with over the last couple of months. Do they know exactly?? Dont know. Thats why I said "rumor".

What do you have? What details did you have beyond Spears is a big ole meanie?

Yeah...sure. Ok. Your "speculation" makes absolutely no sense.

The timeline says Waggoner got canned long before the stadium opening. What "spotlight"?? Why would a coach be given a "spotlight" he too played no real role in? What are we missing? Have there been tickertape parades celebrating Spears/baseball stadium in downtown?

$$$ going out the door.

1 story? 🤣 🤣 🤣 I thought you said the University was "publishing rumors"?

IMO it wasn't a story in the HD quoting Wags that got him tossed. I'm going with internal rumors related to insubordination.

1) You misinterpreted. My rumors came from people inside the university. Not the university the university itself. I didn't say the school published rumors.....go read again.

2)Uhhhhh, the AD has ultimate authority over the coach and players. If there is an issue of misconduct by a coach that is detrimental to players/school......yes, the coach can be terminated and yes it's the AD's responsibility. IMO this was an insubordination issue and he was terminated. End of story.

Is there a lawsuit filed somewhere no one knows about?

Step up then. Give more $$ and get on the inside, so you can tell all the facts.

Is there a lawsuit filed somewhere no one knows about?

No. Not really. But carry on.

giphy.gif
Here are just a few posts the last few months on this forum. None of them directed or referring to you.
You want to try again???
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT