If You Are Betting
- Thread starter bbneutralfan
- Start date
So, in Vegas. Can bet right in the hotel. Currently Herd -5.5 w/ o/u 52. Can parlay . Is the Herd a good bet? How about the o/u. Thanks & Go Herd!
I would never bet The Herd on the road giving points to anyone. I would consider the o/u at 52.
By the way, I am now seeing Herd -4.5 at most Vegas betting venues. Westgate, MGM, Wynn etc.
Well - that was advice well taken! Isn't it interesting how close the score was to the line? I believe in the end it was -3.5 Marshall. The over/under came in well below the 52. I lost money on the tables, but kept my powder dry with the bookie. This week Marshall -7. Hoo-boy, that seems like a lot. Stockstill is an excellent left hander with 5 years college experience. We better bring it on D.
Here is the line history at the major books. Unless you happened to make your play during the one hour period on 9/25 where a few of the books had it as a pick 'em, the rest of the week you would have lost unless you bought points. In that case, you lost money considering your alleged win already lost money on the juice compared with your loss not to mention the lower payout for having to buy points.
So, tell us, did you just happen to make that play during the hour it was a pick 'em before it quickly jumped back to WMU being the favorite or did you play it during the other 119 hours over five days?
http://www.vegasinsider.com/college...higan-@-miami-ohio.cfm/date/9-29-18/time/1530
YAGS - what do you think of MU -6.5 hosting MTSU? ...asking for a friend.
I had Western Michigan at +2. I placed that bet on Bovada. Not sure about your history, but thanks for informing me on what I did.
Last edited:
Yes, between those two games I lost money. I also hit my NFL parlay. But since you just got owned, I realize you needed to try shy away from it.
What fantasy world do you live in? You posted two games. One you lost. One you claimed to have won. Assuming everything else the same (money played, juice), you lost money by going 1-1. The only one who "got owned" in that case is you. The sportsbook thanks you.
Wouldn't touch it. If you HAD to play it, I'd buy a half-point on MTSU and take them at +7, but again, I wouldn't touch it.
Yes I lost 10% on those games. What a HORRIBLE ROUGH weekend that would be. You got schooled trying to argue the line with me and then once you got embarrassed about knowing nothing, you changed it back to trying to claim I had a rough weekend betting, even though your original post was to try and claim I lose both games and the juice on both, making that a rough weekend. So.... eat a dyck
What you posted didn't prove anything. You claim you went with WMU during the rare time it worked to cover the spread. Fine. I'll take your word. It still doesn't change the fact that you lost. Then, like any good degenerate, you claimed that you played games that you didn't post about which you miraculously won all of, making your weekend of losing into a weekend of winning. It's amazing that it always works like that when you don't post the games ahead of time.
Have you met our friend DHerd yet? He has a 40% winning percentage on games he posts about before they kickoff and a 100% winning percentage on games he posts about after the outcome has been decided.
You don't have to take my word genius, I POSTED the picture of it. Get da fook outta here. As I said, you are correct I lost 10% on one bet of the two I played that I posted about. Forgetting about the parlay which is (I agree) irrelevant, you still go owned about your game line facts, and therefore look like a moron for trying to say I had a rough weekend, because you assumed I lost them both. Stop trying to back out of the argument with misinformation. You thought I lost both games- period. If you knew I didn't, you wouldn't have even commented about it being a rough weekend. Bum
Not that you will believe me or care, but I actually make money gambling on sports. I really don't care about your opinion of it, although ironically I agree with you on buying the point for MTSU and taking the 7, which I did this morning. Unfortunately it wasn't posted on Bovada by the time it dropped below +7.5
Other good bets this weekend:
Indiana
Tulane
Other good bets this weekend:
Indiana
Tulane
You aren't much of a player 1) if you're using Bovada since they post games 2 days after other sites, so you're missing the easy steals 2) if you're using Bovada because they don't put in all of the FCS games which is grand theft if you know what you're doing 3) if you're using Bovada as your only book which makes you a slave to those lines where you could lose up to 1.5 points compared to other books.
My friend went 10-3-1 for the weekend. He should have gone 12-1-1. He went with North Texas and FAU to cover. Both of those teams jumped out to big leads against inferior teams and then blew it. He is up $14K+ this football season on one book, so he has opened an account in a third book because he is expecting his account to be closed.
You aren't much of a player 1) if you're using Bovada since they post games 2 days after other sites, so you're missing the easy steals 2) if you're using Bovada because they don't put in all of the FCS games which is grand theft if you know what you're doing 3) if you're using Bovada as your only book which makes you a slave to those lines where you could lose up to 1.5 points compared to other books.
My friend went 10-3-1 for the weekend. He should have gone 12-1-1. He went with North Texas and FAU to cover. Both of those teams jumped out to big leads against inferior teams and then blew it. He is up $14K+ this football season on one book, so he has opened an account in a third book because he is expecting his account to be closed.
I'm thoroughly impressed that you know someone else who had a good weekend. I use Bovada for multiple reasons, and really don't care about the offshore sites that constantly fluctuate and close. Like you said- he's afraid his account will be closed. That would never happen at Bovada...
It absolutely does. They are notorious for closing accounts when a player wins too much or builds up too much in his account. Clearly, that's something you don't have to worry about.
Another rough weekend for you.
Yeah 2-1 is really bad.... Marshall and Indiana cover and Tulane doesn't.
What planet are you from? What a dumbass
If you win too much they will close your account? That is crazy but I guess that’s how they keep making money.
They might white flag you for sports betting wins if it becomes too consistent, but they are never going to freeze your funds. Also if you play poker they will keep your account open because they take a rake from you regardless who wins.
This guy continues to think he is one of those who knows more than Vegas because his friend has a 'system'. You know the type- smokes weed on a regular, acts like they know more than everyone else because they get stoned, thinks they know about programs because they have hung out with players, gambles each weekend and has a big weekend once a month so they think they're real players. This is also the guy who thinks I'm losing money because I have given picks on here that are 3-2 the last two week. He's butthurt
You can't even get your lies straight, moron. Marshall didn't cover, as you just said they did. They were 6.5 favorites. They lost outright. When you lie so much, as the good little degenerate that you are, you can't even remember which team you lied about taking.
The chubby kid has no idea what he is talking about. Freezing/closing accounts isn't just with online, offshore bookies. Now that gambling is opening up in many states, it is happening in those sportsbooks, too. New Jersey casinos, very recently having been able to accepts sports bets, already has started closing accounts for simply winning too much.
http://www.espn.com/chalk/story/_/i...g-us-legal-betting-market-allowed-ban-bettors
And they will take your funds, regardless of what chubby says. They create rules/interpret ambiguous rules to their advantage. For instance, assume a player has $20,000 in his account. Assume on one NFL Sunday, he has all $20,000 of that active on a few games during the early afternoon games. However, he has a late afternoon game that he really wants to play, and he doesn't know if his early games will 1) win to provide him with more money to bet 2) finish their games on time so that he can get the money from the bets back in his account in order to bet on that late afternoon game.
So what does he do? He deposits more money into his account (which it seems like the book would appreciate). Eventually, when he goes to withdraw a large amount from his account, the book reviews the account. They look for anything they can question, regardless of how small, to delay/stop/recoup some of that money the player is trying to withdraw.
For instance . . . during that last deposit, he had $20,000 in active plays going on, but his account balance was $0 (due to all of those games still being played). When he made that last deposit of $2000 in order to play the late afternoon game, he was also given a $200 bonus (with all types of requirements and rules attached to it). Now that it is three months later and he is trying to withdraw $40,000, the book has closed or frozen his account. Their "review" claims that he violated the terms and conditions of the bonus. What was this violation that was so severe to stop being paid his $40,000? He was given a bonus while still having money in his account. Even though his account balance was $0 due to all of his money being put on active games, one of the numerous terms & conditions (which are almost always impossible to find on the website, if they are even published) is that he cannot be given any bonus on a deposit, regardless of how small, if he still has more than 10% left in his account of his last deposit.
Even though his account balance was $0, which is why he deposited more, the book considers his $20,000 in ungraded plays (games that are still being played) as being his "account balance." Due to that little $200 bonus, now his $40,000 is being stopped for his violation of the terms and conditions. And it isn't like they will simply deduct that $200 bonus from the $40,000 and pay the rest. They will argue that the $200 bonus in your account allowed you to be comfortable playing all of those games you won, so without that, you would have only earned $3000.
That's just one example of many excuses they will find to not pay all (or any) of your winnings back. Of course, they don't have to worry about that much, because of the overwhelming majority of players are degenerates like chubby who can't even remember which teams he lied about taking and who covered/didn't cover. The few who aren't degenerates and actually win get pushed away.
The Marshall GAME your dumb jack. Sheezus you can't even fu***ng read and you are trying to argue with me. As I said, I was also taking MTSU and buying the half point, making the games I stated on this board- 2-1 this weekend.
When you want to get a clue let me know.. unless then I will enjoy winning records every weekend while you try to tell others how to be through overseas accounts and get your dumbass accounts closed.
By the way this week-
Buffalo (in college since I am sure you'll try to claim I meant NFL when they cover)
Indiana
Michigan UNDER
Buffalo (in college since I am sure you'll try to claim I meant NFL when they cover)
Indiana
Michigan UNDER
This is what you said:
"Marshall and Indiana cover and Tulane doesn't."
I read just fine. It is a case of you being wrong with the info that you type and not being able to keep your lies straight. Yes, Indiana covered. Yes, Tulane didn't. However, you also said that Marshall covered. Marshall didn't cover. That is bogus. They were favorites yet lost the game outright. That's the exact opposite of covering, moron.
If you weren't a degenerate, you wouldn't have to lie. If you didn't lie, you wouldn't so easily be exposed as a moron.
Read the picks I originally made. The Marshall game. Obviously that's what I meant since I described it originally. My Marshall game PICK covered. Go back and read the entire thread you stupid phuck. Until then, shut the hell up.
I've also noticed that pretty much everyone on this board knows you're a jackass moron. Funny that you've burned every bridge here and try to make up for it by claiming things that aren't true which makes you look even worse. Do yourself a favor, stop posting. It might save you the last little bit of pride you have left.
So you said something entirely opposite and inaccurate than what you claim you intended to say, yet I am the "stupid phuck"? I think typing or gambling may be too hard for you if you can't articulate what you meant to say or you don't understand what "covering" means in gambling.
That's odd coming from a guy whose feelings got hurt because moderators called him out for being a moron and then said he was leaving this board.
I am leaving the board on those discussions... but I get tired of morons like you who don't know how to read. It's just a pet peeve of mine.... moron adults.
buying the point for MTSU and taking the 7, which I did this morning. Unfortunately it wasn't posted on Bovada by the time it dropped below +7.5
Other good bets this weekend:
Indiana
Tulane
I apologize that copy and paste is in English, this board doesn't have an option to translate it into dumbass or moron...
Other good bets this weekend:
Indiana
Tulane
I apologize that copy and paste is in English, this board doesn't have an option to translate it into dumbass or moron...
Similar threads
MU PRESS RELEASE Marshall Announces 36 Signees In Class of 2024
