ADVERTISEMENT

Ivy Schools are ran by anti- sematic bigots

ohio herd

Platinum Buffalo
Gold Member
Aug 28, 2012
9,500
5,603
113
The President of Harvard and U of Penn plus MIT President are all under fire for not taking a proper stance on the anti sematic Jew hating conduct of many students on campus. Instead of dealing with it they try to play word games and prove how smart they are and show their own hatred of jews. Well at least one donor to U of Penn is withdrawing a 100 million dollar gift



Just more hate filled actions from the left
 
  • Like
Reactions: rvntx
The President of Harvard and U of Penn plus MIT President are all under fire for not taking a proper stance on the anti sematic Jew hating conduct of many students on campus. Instead of dealing with it they try to play word games and prove how smart they are and show their own hatred of jews. Well at least one donor to U of Penn is withdrawing a 100 million dollar gift



Just more hate filled actions from the left
At a time when colleges all across the us are "right-sizing", the left is alienating their Jewish alums & donors.
 
show their own hatred of jews.
You’re a nice you, and I like you, so I won’t be too hard on you.

But let’s use some critical thinking and try to be honest.

Do you think all three of these women have a “hatred of Jews” or do you think it’s far more likely that they have been previously under attack for infringing on the 1st Amendment by stopping hate speech when controversial figures would come to their campus to speak, and they are trying to balance that?

Do you think they have a “hatred of Jews” or is it far more likely that they are trying to not condone the killing of innocents on either side, and they don’t want to take a harsh stance against either side on this issue in order not to alienate a large group of people?
 
Do you think all three of these women have a “hatred of Jews” or do you think it’s far more likely that they have been previously under attack for infringing on the 1st Amendment by stopping hate speech when controversial figures would come to their campus to speak, and they are trying to balance that?

It’s far, FAR more likely that they are all just leftists who side with the Palestinians. Simple as that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThunderCat98
It’s far, FAR more likely that they are all just leftists who side with the Palestinians. Simple as that.
And it makes ZERO sense. Gay rights? Womens rights? How can you just ignore those two pillars of a big portion of what you supposably fight for when that ain’t happening anywhere near Palestine.
 
And it makes ZERO sense. Gay rights? Womens rights? How can you just ignore those two pillars of a big portion of what you supposably fight for when that ain’t happening anywhere near Palestine.
SleauxTard ^^^
 
You can call me Sleaux tard all you want, but it doesn’t change the fact about gay rights and womens rights in Palestinian areas.
I will call you SleauxTard as much as I want. You're too stupid to realize that women's rights and gay rights has little to no bearing on whether or not someone doesn't want an imprisoned people to be bombed into non existence.
 
Sounds like the Ivy League schools are ran by the people that run Basic Wood Custom Cabinetry OW.
 
The President of Harvard and U of Penn plus MIT President are all under fire for not taking a proper stance on the anti sematic Jew hating conduct of many students on campus. Instead of dealing with it they try to play word games and prove how smart they are and show their own hatred of jews. Well at least one donor to U of Penn is withdrawing a 100 million dollar gift



Just more hate filled actions from the left
Fire every single fvcking one of them. Time to clean house in academia is way past due.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
It’s far, FAR more likely that they are all just leftists who side with the Palestinians. Simple as that.

"Controversial figures" that just happen to be all right wing people. Not much "controversy" when a marxist is speaking though.

It's selective/asymmetric enforcement of what they deem hate speech. They have no framework for dealing in their oppressed/oppresser matrix when the oppressors are literally raped by the oppressed.

I actually don't think they need to police the anti Jew speech. Just use the same standards across the board...and quit thinking the school itself needs to take a stance on any and every single event. UChicago typically as the best free speech paradigms. Harvard has been awful.

All of the sudden the standard at their testimony was "if it turns into actual violence then it's against our code..."

But the last 5 years all we've heard is that "words are violence."

So which is it?
 
You’re a nice you, and I like you, so I won’t be too hard on you.

But let’s use some critical thinking and try to be honest.

Do you think all three of these women have a “hatred of Jews” or do you think it’s far more likely that they have been previously under attack for infringing on the 1st Amendment by stopping hate speech when controversial figures would come to their campus to speak, and they are trying to balance that?

Do you think they have a “hatred of Jews” or is it far more likely that they are trying to not condone the killing of innocents on either side, and they don’t want to take a harsh stance against either side on this issue in order not to alienate a large group of people?
They weren't asked about first amendment rights. They were asked about their own school codes of conduct. If the roles were reversed and a group of white guys were calling for the genocide of Palestine you know damn well athey wouldn't be skating around the issue. These universities are scared to "offend" certain groups for fear of backlash. They are letting the inmates run the asylum. It's the reason your governor canceled the annual Christmas tree lighting ceremony
 
All of the sudden the standard at their testimony was "if it turns into actual violence then it's against our code..."

But the last 5 years all we've heard is that "words are violence."

So which is it?
I'm not saying that how the three presidents articulated their stances was correct. But you also have to understand the criticism they have recently and previously faced regarding the 1st Amendment while trying to balance this situation.

"Controversial figures" that just happen to be all right wing people. Not much "controversy" when a marxist is speaking though.

Well, yeah. Reality is that the most putrid of opinions comes from the right.

Marxism shouldn't be a controversial subject nor stance on either side. The merits of its success can be debated, but there is nothing controversial about either side of that issue.

On the other hand, bigotry based on homosexuality ethnicity, race, etc. are and should be controversial, and those people should not be provided a pulpit.
 
These universities are scared to "offend" certain groups for fear of backlash. They are letting the inmates run the asylum. It's the reason your governor canceled the annual Christmas tree lighting ceremony
You make no sense.

He cancelled the tree event in order to avoid protests of Palestinian supporters calling for a stop to the bombings by Israel. He was concerned about the safety. So he actually stopped the ability of those you claim the left supports from being able to protest.
 
I will call you SleauxTard as much as I want. You're too stupid to realize that women's rights and gay rights has little to no bearing on whether or not someone doesn't want an imprisoned people to be bombed into non existence.
Israel is not the one preventing Palestinians from being settled elsewhere and unimprisoned.
 
Israel is not the one preventing Palestinians from being settled elsewhere and unimprisoned.
People in Gaza cannot leave just anytime they want. You moron. Israel and Egypt have them surrounded with the help of the Mediterranean sea.
 
You make no sense.

He cancelled the tree event in order to avoid protests of Palestinian supporters calling for a stop to the bombings by Israel. He was concerned about the safety. So he actually stopped the ability of those you claim the left supports from being able to protest.
So he was worried about the religion of peace.
 
People in Gaza cannot leave just anytime they want. You moron. Israel and Egypt have them surrounded with the help of the Mediterranean sea.
You do realize there are Palestians living in Israel. There are even Palestians if Israeli defense forces.
 
You do realize there are Palestians living in Israel. There are even Palestians if Israeli defense forces.
You do realize I stated People in Gaza cannot leave just anytime they want. You moron. Israel and Egypt have them surrounded with the help of the Mediterranean sea.
 
You do realize I stated People in Gaza cannot leave just anytime they want. You moron. Israel and Egypt have them surrounded with the help of the Mediterranean sea.
Hello, stop supporting terrorism and join the modern world. Don't you think Israel would rather have a trading partner that harbor of terrorism. Oh, Egypt doesn't want to deal with them either. When you life goal is to kille Jews then you have issues.

They ****ed around and found out this time.
 
Hello, stop supporting terrorism and join the modern world. Don't you think Israel would rather have a trading partner that harbor of terrorism. Oh, Egypt doesn't want to deal with them either. When you life goal is to kille Jews then you have issues.

They ****ed around and found out this time.
People in Gaza cannot leave just anytime they want. You moron. Israel and Egypt have them surrounded with the help of the Mediterranean sea.
 
People in Gaza cannot leave just anytime they want. You moron. Israel and Egypt have them surrounded with the help of the Mediterranean sea.
so, they could start becoming more civilized. But, no they hate Jews.
 
You might hate jews also if you were imprisoned by them, lived in an area with a 44% unemployment rate with the daily average wage of $13.
Maybe but that doesn't comdone raping women, killing babies, etc. They have blind hatred of jews. They will never amount to anything as Iong as that is the norm. Their own leaders take advantage of them.

How are they imprisoned? Thet could have a flourishing resort area. They could conduct commerce and trade. No they want to kill Jews.
 
Maybe but that doesn't comdone raping women, killing babies, etc.
Who said it did?
They have blind hatred of jews.
We just adressed that. You would too.
Their own leaders take advantage of them.
Yes. They do.
How are they imprisoned?
We just addressed this.
Thet could have a flourishing resort area.
That's pretty difficult when israel doesn't allow tourists.
They could conduct commerce and trade.
Israel controls that.
 
Who said it did?

We just adressed that. You would too.

Yes. They do.

We just addressed this.

That's pretty difficult when israel doesn't allow tourists.

Israel controls that.
Gaza was turned over by the Israelis
 
Well this may “solve” the current zeitgeist but the foundation of it all (a huge
do nothing DEI police , inserting race issues to every single dept) just expands….

 
  • Haha
Reactions: ThunderCat98
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT