ADVERTISEMENT

Kim Jong Un, Hamas, MS-13...

big_country90

Platinum Buffalo
Feb 9, 2007
14,683
4,642
113
How many enemies of America can democrats side with in one week?

Thank God it's the weekend, right dems?
 
Lets go one-by-one. Why has he failed miserably to get electricity back in Puerto Rico?
Good luck

gettyimages-853109210.jpg
 
Good luck

Talked with a woman who was visiting from Puerto Rico a few days ago. She said that there are a ton of high-end resorts on the water, including in San Juan, which still don't have electricity. All of those workers are still without jobs.

Why isn't he concerned about getting electricity back to even urban areas? Do you think he would sit back and not be more active if this were say, Omaha?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raoul Duke MU
I'm no lib....but what's your position on trump colluding with Russia to get elected? If you support trump when he commits treason... What does that say about your patriotism?
 
Talked with a woman who was visiting from Puerto Rico a few days ago. She said that there are a ton of high-end resorts on the water, including in San Juan, which still don't have electricity. All of those workers are still without jobs.

Why isn't he concerned about getting electricity back to even urban areas? Do you think he would sit back and not be more active if this were say, Omaha?
Maybe but Puerto Rico and Nebraska are too logistically different and different in terms of infrastructure and completing projects. In case you missed it, Puerto Rico is an island and most of it is very rural and rugged terrain.
 
Apr 19, 2018 05:46 PM EDT
For most of Wednesday, the entire island of Puerto Rico was without power.

A blackout swept the U.S. territory Wednesday morning after an excavator hit a transmission line, severing power for 1.4 million people. It is the first island-wide outage since Hurricane Maria made landfall Sept. 20.

state power authority PREPA reported. The line has failed a few times before, causing other outages.

Puerto Rico Gov. Ricardo Rosselló said in a statement that the power authority should cancel their contract with a power subcontractor who he said was responsible for both outages.

Before the recent outages, more than 96 percent of customers on the island who lost power during Maria had electricity restored, according to PREPA. But more than 40,000 residents have been without regular electricity in the last seven months.
 
I DONT SEE RUSSIER OR CHINER ON THAT LIST.
NO COLLUSION, NO COLLUSION, NO COLLUSION, - NO OBSTRUCTION.
 
It says your assertion has not been proven and you are basically full of shit.
if you want to believe Trump had no knowledge of his close friends, campaign mgmt as well as his family meeting with Russians....or if you chose to ignore his public statement asking Russia to look into emails....that's your choice...but someone electing not to ignore those facts doesn't make them full of shit.
 
if you want to believe Trump had no knowledge of his close friends, campaign mgmt as well as his family meeting with Russians....or if you chose to ignore his public statement asking Russia to look into emails....that's your choice...but someone electing not to ignore those facts doesn't make them full of shit.

clearly, you are stupid.
 
Sure...and I suppose Hillary was totally innocent in regards to Bengazi or not guilty of intentionally mishandling classified documents because it was not f'n "proven".
 
Sure...and I suppose Hillary was totally innocent in regards to Bengazi or not guilty of intentionally mishandling classified documents because it was not f'n "proven".

How about the Hillary campaign actually paying for the made up ("Russian" sourced) dossier?
 
None of the facts I mentioned had anything to do with that damned dossier. Why even bring it up?

And, as I'm sure you know, it began as a republican research piece.

Btw, as someone who handled classified info in a previous life, I thought it was complete BS that Hillary got out of that crap - sending classified info to her server.
 
Last edited:
How many emails were marked classified when she sent/received them?
What law was broken?
The only benchmark I have is my experience. There is no gray area when handling classified info.... She KNEW what she was doing was a huge breach of the laws governing how classified info was to be handled and maintained...but she did it anyway. Why? So she didn't have carry two cell phones? That's a bigger crock than "no collusion".

We were threatened with jail at worst or a reprimand at the least. If someone in the military had done what she did, at the minimum, they would have had their security clearance stripped and placed on roads and grounds for the remainder of their military career.
 
hillary was not in the military. irrelevant.
there was no law against the personal email server.

"a total of 2 emails were marked as classified.
110 out of the 30,000 she turned over were classified but unmarked.
Evidence seems to indicate that Clinton generally dealt with classified information in an appropriate manner.

The day after we published this fact-check, Comey testified before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on July 7. Comey said he believes three emails on Clinton's server contained information labeled classified at the time they were sent. This information was not properly marked in that the emails did not have a classification header, even though a "(c)" immediately preceded text in the body of the emails, designating confidential information. Without the clear classification header, it's reasonable to infer that Clinton did not realize these three emails contained classified information, he said."

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...ndings-tear-holes-hillary-clintons-email-def/
 
Obama did not have a problem with using the specialized BlackBerry that was made for him, why did Clinton feel it was an inconvenience for her?
 
the investigation found 110 emails in 52 email chains containing information that was classified at the time it was sent or received. Eight chains contained top secret information, the highest level of classification, 36 chains contained secret information, and the remaining eight contained confidential information. Most of these emails, however, did not contain markings clearly delineating their status.

Even so, Clinton and her team still should have known the information was not appropriate for an unclassified system, Comey said.

"There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton's position or in the position of those with whom she was corresponding about the matters should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation," Comey said of some of the top secret chains.

About 2,000 additional emails have been retroactively classified, or up-classified, meaning the information was not classified when it was first emailed. This is a regular practice when documents are reviewed for release, according to transparency experts.

Throughout this saga, Clinton has said she turned over all work-related emails to the State Department. But Comey said FBI investigators uncovered "several thousand" work-related emails that she had not handed over, and three of those were classified at the time they were sent, though they were not marked as such.

Comey added that some work-related emails are still out there, but FBI investigators were unable to find them. It’s possible those emails could contain classified information.
 
hillary was not in the military. irrelevant.
there was no law against the personal email server.

"a total of 2 emails were marked as classified.
110 out of the 30,000 she turned over were classified but unmarked.
Evidence seems to indicate that Clinton generally dealt with classified information in an appropriate manner.

The day after we published this fact-check, Comey testified before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on July 7. Comey said he believes three emails on Clinton's server contained information labeled classified at the time they were sent. This information was not properly marked in that the emails did not have a classification header, even though a "(c)" immediately preceded text in the body of the emails, designating confidential information. Without the clear classification header, it's reasonable to infer that Clinton did not realize these three emails contained classified information, he said."

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...ndings-tear-holes-hillary-clintons-email-def/
She broke NDA rules, security clearance violations, and mishandling of sensitive info. That is problem just the tip of the iceburg.

The violation of the NDA would land most people in front of a federal judge and would likely be faced with time in a federal prison.

You don't screw with a federal NDA.
 
She broke NDA rules, security clearance violations, and mishandling of sensitive info. That is problem just the tip of the iceburg.

The violation of the NDA would land most people in front of a federal judge and would likely be faced with time in a federal prison.

You don't screw with a federal NDA.

Hillary....broke.....no....laws. You've never been able to accept that fact. But not accepting facts is what makes you a precious little Cheetos puff.
 
US Code 18 chapter 37 section 793

Did you ignore the first sentence, or not comprehend it?

" (a) Whoever, for the purpose of obtaining information respecting the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation"
 
Did you ignore the first sentence, or not comprehend it?

" (a) Whoever, for the purpose of obtaining information respecting the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation"
There is more than one subsection. Did you read the last word? In case you didnt it was "OR" keep reading specifically subsection F
 
Yeah, right after "OR" it says "Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid"
(f)
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both


Hmm NOWHERE does it say aforesaid
 
There's no gray area. Its black or white. There is no "generally" handle classified documents properly. Either you do or you don't. Its national security - it's drilled into you. No excuses...and she knowingly and intentionally mishandled that info.

IMO, she sucked as a candidate too...

If you can't hang... Then you don't get clearance. Ask Jared Kushner.
 
There's no gray area. Its black or white. There is no "generally" handle classified documents properly. Either you do or you don't. Its national security - it's drilled into you. No excuses...and she knowingly and intentionally mishandled that info.

IMO, she sucked as a candidate too...

If you can't hang... Then you don't get clearance. Ask Jared Kushner.
We disagree on some issues , but you are correct.

Most anybody down to a private or janitorial staff know they would be in jail in the did what hillary did.

When you get "read in", you don't mess around with it.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT