ADVERTISEMENT

Marshall is Absolutely Pathetic for Withdrawing

We were never down to 41 players and three lineman, maybe these are the numbers they wanted to play. But i'm pretty confident the team number was near 105, like every other D1 program. Even if you subtract 40, that still leaves 65 kids who are staying home, no reward for their WHOLE YEAR efforts; it was there chance.
You have th go a little deeper.

Start with the fact we have 85 scholarship players and understand that most walk-ons are necessary practice bodies, maybe 1 or 2 grows enough to earn a scholarship, but most last a year or two and are gone.

So, if we have lost 35 players it means we have 50 scholarship players left. Then you have to subtract those that may have been injured throughout the year and aren’t available.

Out of those remaining 47-48 players you have 15 or so FR that have been RS this year, so that leaves just over 30 players that have been active and may have participated in a game this season.

It’s simply not in the best interest of the safety of the players to ask walk-ons and RS players to go play 50-60 snaps in their very first live action game. It’s not like “gosh, they played in HS, so what’s the big deal?”. You are asking 18 year olds that haven’t really gotten a lot of coaching attention all season to go line up against 22-23 year old men with 4-5 years of training at this level.

Then you have to look at the available players by position group. Of the 30 some players that have some experience and have to play the majority of the snaps, do you have enough to cover the required 22 positions? Doesn’t work if 8 of them are safeties, unless it’s a good idea to put a safety at DE to get run over by a 290lb tackle all day.

I understand the kids would play, it’s what they do. They don’t want to come off the field when they’re injured. However, it’s the responsibility of the program to not put them in unnecessary danger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: raleighherdfan
You have th go a little deeper.
Season 4 Michael GIF by The Office
 
It’s wild how bent up everyone is that we aren’t playing in a bowl game with a team that would have struggled to defend their option, coaches that would have been able to pull it together quickly, and not get stomped by 45. It would have been more embarrassing than to regroup, rebuild, and recover.

We won the conference championship and were picked 5th in the division at the beginning of the season.

Coach did his job. The players got their conference championship. Let them all go about their business.

Exactly. Funny thing is Spears actually said Huff and he agreed, Huff would focus on winning a SBC title...and he did exactly that.
Huff may be a bad person (I dunno, never met him) but he professionally keeps his word.
 
  • Like
Reactions: herdinmichigan
We were down to 51 players. 29 of which had taken a snap all year. And a coaching staff that was also limited. The University made the right decision in this case.

I feel bad for the seniors who will miss this last opportunity to take the field one more time. But I don’t think any fan of Marshall would have wanted to see the kind of game this limited team would have produced.

Fans wanted a reset from Huff. The university is giving us a reset.
Agreed.
If Marshall got stomped in the bowl game, the fans would have complained on why MU even decided to play.

The majority of the fans on here are a sorry bunch.
 
Marshall isn't Alabama.

Duh.... You don't say...

Alabama is a beneficiary of the current NIL system. MU and the rest of the mid-majors are not...

Edited to add:

And Alabama is only the 17th most popular program in the NCAA...

 
Last edited:
I haven't heard anything, but I wonder if some of the seniors said they weren't interested in playing Army without a QB and other key players? They just won the the SBC and why play in a game that they would be undermanned? Their last game they would be champions vs the possibility losing badly to Army. They would go winners vs losers.
 
Exactly. Funny thing is Spears actually said Huff and he agreed, Huff would focus on winning a SBC title...and he did exactly that.
Huff may be a bad person (I dunno, never met him) but he professionally keeps his word.

I think circumstances kept Huff's word and not Huff himself.

Six games into this season he was barely a .500 HC - that would have gotten him fired at Boise St.

Had he been more than a barely .500 HC he would have been gone from MU.

If either of these, and other similar, circumstances occurred he would have not won the SBC title at MU and thus "professionally kept his word"...
 
At the rate that Marshall football is falling apart, the Joan will be a mattress recycling center by the time I can get down to another game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bris1112
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT