My take on the Confederate Flag
- Thread starter Herd Fever
- Start date
I wasn't aware aerosol cans were "mowing" down innocent children in schools in the 70's PJ? Did they need to be collected? We will ignore further the hoax known as "global cooling" from that same period, for obvious reasons. Its as fraudulent as misguided "do-gooders" suggesting that banning guns will prevent bad people from acquiring them and using them against the innocent.
As far as the pics Herdman offered.....did someone say "crickets" a day or so ago? I thought for sure someone (who always seems to demand a link while never answering anything himself--Greed) would post a link explaining the purpose and meaning behind the Bill of Rights. These pictures do it justice though. Enough said.
As far as the pics Herdman offered.....did someone say "crickets" a day or so ago? I thought for sure someone (who always seems to demand a link while never answering anything himself--Greed) would post a link explaining the purpose and meaning behind the Bill of Rights. These pictures do it justice though. Enough said.
There is no buyback in Obama's gun control agenda. No American would lose a single gun. Not one.
Sure! Then, what would they like to do next! I am sure they would just stop. I have some beachfront property in Arizona for sale.
Oh and if they ban something what does that mean?
Did the 1994 assault weapons BAN take anyone's guns? Did it take a single gun? Just one. Did it take any gun from anyone in the U.S.? No.
As a matter of equity, the law exempted
“grandfathered” guns and magazines
manufactured before the ban took effect.
Google is your friend. Use it. Don't be lazy. Set a good example for your son.
You see first it was flag and I knew it would turn into a gun control measure. The liberals and far left are actually scary in a dictatorial way.
no, you're just making stuff up, and can't stop doing so. you make up stuff to defend the stuff you make up.
Me? You are saying Obama would never take the guns. Why he just wants to do this and that.
Sure OK. Just admit it you don't think people should have guns and you trust the government when it is your side that is in power.
Oh, and you don't want to admit why the 2nd Amendment is in place.
Hey Google is your friend. We haven't talk about the leaked DOJ Memo. Gun grabber.
You can get it from multiple sources. Google.com
------------------------------------------------
Gun control may still be very much a topic for national conversation, and the prospects of some variety of gun control legislation may look better for anti-gun forces than they have in nearly 20 years, but a Justice Department internal memo from early in the year that just got leaked to the public may scuttle all of that. The memo comes from the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), a subgroup within the Justice Department, which defines itself this way:
The National Institute of Justice — the research, development and evaluation agency of the U.S. Department of Justice — is dedicated to improving knowledge and understanding of crime and justice issues through science. NIJ provides objective and independent knowledge and tools to reduce crime and promote justice, particularly at the state and local levels.
In other words, when a policy is proposed that the department has to enforce, they go to this group with questions. No partisan agenda can be reasonably inferred, and if there were one, it would likely incline toward the administration’s preferred policy.
Not that you’d know it from reading the memo itself, which takes aim at nearly every form of gun control proposed by the Obama administration and its allies in Congress, and systematically shoots it all down (no pun intended), or argues for proposals that are completely politically untenable. Making matters worse for the administration, the memo wasn’t drafted by some low level flunky in the NIJ, but rather from Greg Ridgeway, its Deputy Director. Moreover, Ridgeway is not a Bush administration holdover, but was, in fact, hired last year right in the thick of President Obama’s reelection campaign.
You can get it from multiple sources. Google.com
------------------------------------------------
Gun control may still be very much a topic for national conversation, and the prospects of some variety of gun control legislation may look better for anti-gun forces than they have in nearly 20 years, but a Justice Department internal memo from early in the year that just got leaked to the public may scuttle all of that. The memo comes from the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), a subgroup within the Justice Department, which defines itself this way:
The National Institute of Justice — the research, development and evaluation agency of the U.S. Department of Justice — is dedicated to improving knowledge and understanding of crime and justice issues through science. NIJ provides objective and independent knowledge and tools to reduce crime and promote justice, particularly at the state and local levels.
In other words, when a policy is proposed that the department has to enforce, they go to this group with questions. No partisan agenda can be reasonably inferred, and if there were one, it would likely incline toward the administration’s preferred policy.
Not that you’d know it from reading the memo itself, which takes aim at nearly every form of gun control proposed by the Obama administration and its allies in Congress, and systematically shoots it all down (no pun intended), or argues for proposals that are completely politically untenable. Making matters worse for the administration, the memo wasn’t drafted by some low level flunky in the NIJ, but rather from Greg Ridgeway, its Deputy Director. Moreover, Ridgeway is not a Bush administration holdover, but was, in fact, hired last year right in the thick of President Obama’s reelection campaign.
Yeah, you. You're attempting to change the subject. I showed you where the "ban" didn't "ban" the guns on it's list, just the sale and manufacture. I'll remind you, provide a link where Obama has proposed taking guns from law abiding Americans. Just one. One single gun. This is the second or third day I've been asking for that link. You.....can't......provide.....one.
I am not going to because you will come up with some other criteria.
You know it is there. Don't want to admit it.
You know it is there. Don't want to admit it.
I know it is NOT. You know it is not. But that doesn't suit your rants, so you make stuff up.
Here you go. One more time:
With a link to the DOJ memo.
http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/articles/2013-02-25/a-doj-memo-shows-why-the-nra-wins-on-gun-control
With a link to the DOJ memo.
http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/articles/2013-02-25/a-doj-memo-shows-why-the-nra-wins-on-gun-control
From YOUR link:
"As the Senate Judiciary Committee moves haltingly toward producing legislation intended to appeal to those same moderate Democrats and at least a few Republicans, the NRA argues in its ad that the Justice memo shows that the administration believes its proposals won’t work unless coupled with national gun registration and even confiscation—more aggressive steps that neither the White House nor congressional Democratic leaders have backed. Indeed, even the most ardent gun-control advocates know that, barring some unforeseen development, registration and confiscation are politically impossible."
Still waiting on a link that shows otherwise............
The Irish wave of immagration kind of came a few years after the framing of the US Consitution
Waiting for that link that doesn't exist about an Obama proposal that didn't happen....
