I'll repeat the question: "Has Obama ever suggested taking anyone's guns?"
Does the assault weapons ban TAKE anyone's guns?
Yes. Unless someone wanted to be in violation of federal law.
I'll repeat the question: "Has Obama ever suggested taking anyone's guns?"
Does the assault weapons ban TAKE anyone's guns?
The Framers would be appalled that the 2nd Amendment is used so that the general public can purchase a weapon that allows them to mow down 20 of their neighbors in less than 10 seconds.
Say whatever you want but you don't need an AR-15.
Yes. Unless someone wanted to be in violation of federal law.
How about a link to back that up...
That the assault weapons ban TAKES guns away from people.
Again......The always unanswered question is, "why do you need an AR-15 or AK-47?"
The President has stated that he believes the US should follow Australia's gun laws. As with my list above, notice the word BAN. It does not say stop production, it says ban and also allows for the Attorney General to add to the list at will. Australia BANNED the weapons and there was a mandatory buy back of those weapons.
Again, does not say stop production from this day forward it says BAN.
You can look it up yourself and form you own opinions. I am not going to be your google search engine. As I told my son in school, more information is available at your finger tips than any other time in history. Don't be lazy. It only takes a second or two to search.
I'll take that as you cannot find a single link where Obama has stated he wants to take guns away from people.
I take it you are being lazy. www.GOOGLE.Com
What answer could I provide you that you would accept? You don't have to get one. You don't want me to have one. You don't even know if I own one.
But, if I were to make a decision to buy one, these thoughts could come into play.
1)It is a legal constitutional right to do so.
2)I enjoy shooting and having one
3)It is a weapon I used in the military
4)I like firearms
5)The cops have one and I want one to. They must think they are good as well.
6)They are downright fun to shoot.
7)Everybody has a hobby now and then.
8)I plan ahead for the protection of my family, myself, and property.
9)Why not have one?
10)Had extra room in a gun safe?
11)My wife thinks it is sexy.
12)This is my weapon and this is my gun.
13)I don't like bolt actions as much
14)I want to hunt coyotes with it. Don't know it looks fun.
15)Something else to collect dust
16)Because I can, damn it.
Doesn't matter the reason, you won't like it.
None of the above equate to "need"........There is no valid reason or need for anyone outside of the military or law enforcement to own an automatic rifle.
Regular Joes can't own automatic weapons. Haven't been able to since 1934. Collectors and some others can apply for a stamp. But it is very regulated.
I don't own automatic weapon and can't legally own one.
Isn't that pretty much the reason for the second amendment?
The Framers would be appalled that the 2nd Amendment is used so that the general public can purchase a weapon that allows them to mow down 20 of their neighbors in less than 10 seconds.
Say whatever you want but you don't need an AR-15.
Nope. I looked before I asked the question. I have not found a credible source stating that Obama wants to take guns from American citizens. Neither have you. It might be that such a link does not exist. If you can't find a link, just man up and say so.
Cricket
So we should limit the cops and military to flintlock muskets! I think they were smarter that what you give them credit for. Technology was changing even in those times and oh for a couple of hundred years the 2nd Amendment could have been over turned.That's exactly the argument that has been going on for decades........Could the Framers of the Constitution ever have anticipated the type of weapons now available to the general public? The 2nd Amendment was also composed in very different times, obviously.
Nope. I looked before I asked the question. I have not found a credible source stating that Obama wants to take guns from American citizens. Neither have you. It might be that such a link does not exist. If you can't find a link, just man up and say so.
we have all the army/nat guard we need. if you want to be in the army, it is your freedom to sign up
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State(United States Of America), the right of the people(militia) to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
KKK is rallying on July 18th at the SC capital steps. Which one of you will be in attendance
we have all the army/nat guard we need. if you want to be in the army, it is your freedom to sign up
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State(United States Of America), the right of the people(militia) to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
On public record wa ting to follow Australia gun laws. Look it up a d read what happened in australia.
Chirp.
Why was the second amendment put in place?
You need to read what the Australia gun ban did and how it worked.
You're wasting your time with your excellent points. Some folks simply refuse to add 2 and 2 together when it goes against their agenda.
You need to read what the Australia gun ban did and how it worked.
Obama has stated that his plan would not take guns from Americans. It would ban the manufacture and sales of guns on the "banned" list. Or you can continue to make things up.
A well regulated militia was need in the South to control the enslaved african population.On public record wa ting to follow Australia gun laws. Look it up a d read what happened in australia.
Chirp.
Why was the second amendment put in place?
Obama has stated that his plan would not take guns from Americans. It would ban the manufacture and sales of guns on the "banned" list. Or you can continue to make things up.
A well regulated militia was need in the South to control the enslaved african population.