Consistency is very difficult, no question.. But Huff has been an HC two years. Doc didn't have a winning regular season until year 4. Doc, like Huff inherited a bowl team.
Let's see what he does in year 3. Every coach we have had, had embarrassing losses, even the great BP.
Doc just had more of them.
As said, the man brought us consistently and won a title. Appreciative of that.
Considering you're more of an adult and far less cringe at attempts of wit and humor than the other guy, I'll actually discuss your post with you.
I agree with you, and I bet a big part of MU's appeal to the SBC was specifically, it's consistency.
Compare MU to others who had 1 or 2 years of success, then absolutely sh*t the bed for the next decade.
MU had one really bad season and managed to turn it around. Given what MU has in terms of, everything, that's impressive.
I'm not sure if Doc had wanted to leave, MU could have sustained itself with consistency. Kudos to him for that.
To your other points;
Doc brought in a completely new system, coordinators, etc., and the team had to adjust to it.
That sort of thing takes 2 years or so. Either Huff or Doc should have been given the pass (more on that later) if the team needed to adjust.
Doc inherited a team that barely got bowl eligible and had a winning record because the DC coached the bowl game.
Huff kept the team largely intact with the offense and he didn't have as much to change.
Huff inherited a team that beat a ranked App State team and played in its conference championship just prior.
There is a bit of a contrast with what either received, but I digress.
A winning regular season, that's a very weird way to spin it...considering both of their first winning seasons are identical winning records with Doc's being year two and Huff's being year one.
But looking at it using your words, Doc got MU to the title game, playing for a championship.
Huff? 3rd in the East finish.
Doc, who was about what you'd expect a new HC with a whole new system/players to be.
He actually could say the team needs time and the system, players, etc. So he could get a bit of a pass and he got one.
The result?
Year 4 is a winning season, title game appearance, and bowl win.
Huff may have been a victim of his own success since people are going to look at the ND win and ridicule him when he can't win the division or conference...having won a little too much, a little too early.
He really can't say the team needs time and the team is young anymore, since that team played like a top 5 in the country in just his 2nd year.
My question is, is it justified for that sort of expectation and should Huff get a pass?