ADVERTISEMENT

Shithole State Passes Absurd Law

Looking to see where he said "He wanted to terminate the constitution". Yep, not in the tweet.
A fraud of this type being allowed to happen ignores the rules, laws, and regulation; essentially terminates the constitution if allowed to continue, is how Trump's tweet reads. He never said he would terminate the constitution. Christ.

@30CAT , @19MU88 -

You both supported the shitty excuse for a human being's argument. Crispy Lips, you also supported the numerically challenged banker's post/argument. I overwhelmingly disproved them both. Not out of the usual, you both have posted in numerous threads since my posts yesterday, yet you haven't challenged any of what I argued to refute and disprove those arguments that you supported.

Are either of you intelligent enough to 1) admit defeat and that the arguments you supported were wrong 2) admit that you're outmatched and don't know how to react until somebody else responds or 3) explain how what I posted was somehow not direct proof of those arguments you supported being wrong?

Instead of your usual drive-by posts which bring nothing to the board, let's see if you can actually engage in intelligent discussion. You both supported those other arguments. I have overwhelmingly showed how they were incorrect. So try to not look like such cowards who lack critical thinking skills.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raoul Duke MU
I'm merely a person of faith. I am of no religion.
While I hold from a sociological viewpoint that religion is a social construct that usually has a wide-ranging hierarchy (we are in agreement that faith and religion are not the same), in practicality if you attend any church with an organized service and others in attendance you have a religion.
 
Last edited:
Assume you're saying that because he's (1) smarter than you, and (2) correct on this issue.
It's odd you all talk about my libertarian philosophical leanings being bullshit, but this guy you are a fan of, Shapiro, is the poster boy of those who claim to be a libertarian, or even classically liberal, but believes in a high level of government control of individuals. Not as a practical application (where I stand, people are assholes and thus we have rules) but really believes and wants controls.

Or he's just a huckster. Which has a high probability of being true.
 
in practicality if you attend any church with an organized service and others in attendance you have a religion.

Sometimes a nondenominational, sometimes other places, where people of faith gather to discuss, celebrate and worship God.

Where 2 or more people gather to do those things, doesn't matter if it's in church or in a cellar, makes no difference. I am of no religion. I'm not a member of anything, regarding God.
 
Sometimes a nondenominational, sometimes other places, where people of faith gather to discuss, celebrate and worship God.

Where 2 or more people gather to do those things, doesn't matter if it's in church or in a cellar, makes no difference. I am of no religion. I'm not a member of anything, regarding God.
Posted in the thread again but didn't know how to respond, huh? Moron, go ahead and try defending your support of those two stupid posts from other. It's ok - you didn't say it, so I will hold them more accountable for their stupidity, but you did support their arguments, so for once, don't be afraid of looking stupid and try supporting their arguments.
 
@30CAT , @19MU88 -

You both supported the shitty excuse for a human being's argument. Crispy Lips, you also supported the numerically challenged banker's post/argument. I overwhelmingly disproved them both. Not out of the usual, you both have posted in numerous threads since my posts yesterday, yet you haven't challenged any of what I argued to refute and disprove those arguments that you supported.

Are either of you intelligent enough to 1) admit defeat and that the arguments you supported were wrong 2) admit that you're outmatched and don't know how to react until somebody else responds or 3) explain how what I posted was somehow not direct proof of those arguments you supported being wrong?

Instead of your usual drive-by posts which bring nothing to the board, let's see if you can actually engage in intelligent discussion. You both supported those other arguments. I have overwhelmingly showed how they were incorrect. So try to not look like such cowards who lack critical thinking skills.

Not once did he call for the termination of our Constitution. That's a lie. It would be impossible anyway.
 
Not once did he call for the termination of our Constitution. That's a lie. It would be impossible anyway.
Moron, I posted the exact quote. He entirely, 100%, absolutely called for the termination of "all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution."
 
@30CAT , @19MU88 -

You both supported the shitty excuse for a human being's argument. Crispy Lips, you also supported the numerically challenged banker's post/argument. I overwhelmingly disproved them both. Not out of the usual, you both have posted in numerous threads since my posts yesterday, yet you haven't challenged any of what I argued to refute and disprove those arguments that you supported.

Are either of you intelligent enough to 1) admit defeat and that the arguments you supported were wrong 2) admit that you're outmatched and don't know how to react until somebody else responds or 3) explain how what I posted was somehow not direct proof of those arguments you supported being wrong?

Instead of your usual drive-by posts which bring nothing to the board, let's see if you can actually engage in intelligent discussion. You both supported those other arguments. I have overwhelmingly showed how they were incorrect. So try to not look like such cowards who lack critical thinking skills.
We've been kicking your ass for some time now. You seem flustered.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
We've been kicking your ass for some time now. You seem flustered.
Keep hiding, coward. If you delay long enough, eventually the authors of those stupid arguments will show up, and then you're off the hook.
 
Moron, I posted the exact quote. He entirely, 100%, absolutely called for the termination of "all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution."

Show me where he said "I want to terminate the Constitution."
 
Show me where he said "I want to terminate the Constitution."
Read the article I posted, moron, which was written from a longtime Fox News host. Read the quote I posted of his, moron.

Why would you continue being this dumb to argue this? He said because of the election, all rules, regulations, and articles (including those in the Constitution) should be terminated. Hell, he couldn't dumb it down anymore than he already did for you.
 
Read the article I posted, moron, which was written from a longtime Fox News host. Read the quote I posted of his, moron.

Why would you continue being this dumb to argue this? He said because of the election, all rules, regulations, and articles (including those in the Constitution) should be terminated. Hell, he couldn't dumb it down anymore than he already did for you.

I did. At no point did he say he wants to terminate our Constitution. Saying differently is a lie.
 
I did. At no point did he say he wants to terminate our Constitution. Saying differently is a lie.
He argued for the termination of the Constitution. Instead of admitting that you were wrong, admitting that you're supporting a guy who wants to terminate the Constitution, and instead of being intellectually honest about making no sense touting your love for America while supporting a candidate who said he wants to terminate the Constitution, you allow yourself to look dumber and dumber.

Fvck, read the Republican media head's article, moron.
 
while supporting a candidate who said he wants to terminate the Constitution

He didn't say that. Meanwhile, you're supporting a pedophile who is ignoring our Constitution and thumbs his nose at the Supreme Court.
 
He didn't say that. Meanwhile, you're supporting a pedophile who is ignoring our Constitution and thumbs his nose at the Supreme Court.
You’re a fvcking moron. Stop ruining the board by arguing things that are clearly wrong. Hell, your own kind from your favorite outlet even wrote about it, moron
 
You’re a fvcking moron. Stop ruining the board by arguing things that are clearly wrong. Hell, your own kind from your favorite outlet even wrote about it, moron

My own kind? I'm not a Republican.

Pedo-Joe blatantly ignores our Constitution and encourages illegal foreign nationals to come here, costing taxpayers billions and nary a word from you.

Wouldn't you rather that money go to helping our own? St. Judes Hospital for instance? Hell no. You put illegal foreign nationals over America's citizens.

Whether Trump did or didn't means squat, because he could ask until he's blue in the face and no way in hell will our Constitution be terminated.

Pedo-Joe is actively ignoring our Constitution and putting our security at serious risk.

Talk is cheap. Action speaks louder than words. You are bitching about Trump's mouth and ignoring Pedo-Joe's action.

F the board, you're actively helping with the destruction of our country.
 
You’re a fvcking moron. Stop ruining the board by arguing things that are clearly wrong. Hell, your own kind from your favorite outlet even wrote about it, moron
Since you seem to really desire a debate (as you troll), perhaps if you stopped with the childish name calling, you could move forward and attempt to discuss things adult like and intelligently. Just a thought
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
I'm merely a person of faith
Neither your orange jesus nor you are a person of faith. You Godless lying trumpchum sucking moron.
I'm not a member of anything, regarding God.
Including the body of Christ.
I'm not a Republican.
Semantics.
illegal foreign nationals to come here, costing taxpayers billions and nary a word from you.
You're a Godless lying trumpchum sucking idiot.
 
Neither your orange jesus nor you are a person of faith. You Godless lying trumpchum sucking moron.

Including the body of Christ.

Semantics.

You're a Godless lying trumpchum sucking idiot.
iu
 
My own kind? I'm not a Republican.

Pedo-Joe blatantly ignores our Constitution and encourages illegal foreign nationals to come here, costing taxpayers billions and nary a word from you.

Wouldn't you rather that money go to helping our own? St. Judes Hospital for instance? Hell no. You put illegal foreign nationals over America's citizens.

Whether Trump did or didn't means squat, because he could ask until he's blue in the face and no way in hell will our Constitution be terminated.

Pedo-Joe is actively ignoring our Constitution and putting our security at serious risk.

Talk is cheap. Action speaks louder than words. You are bitching about Trump's mouth and ignoring Pedo-Joe's action.

F the board, you're actively helping with the destruction of our country.
So you claimed it was false. You claimed he didn't say it. Now, when you're forced to admit he said it, your defense is that he didn't mean it and didn't go through with it, so it doesn't matter? Brilliant.

Moron, he couldn't go through with it. Your concern is something Biden is doing that is not unconstitutional, yet you ignore what Trump said he wanted to do to something you claim to cherish.

This is what intelligent people call "intellectually dishonest."

Since you seem to really desire a debate (as you troll), perhaps if you stopped with the childish name calling, you could move forward and attempt to discuss things adult like and intelligently. Just a thought
You can't do anything intelligently, moron. That's the entire point of me mocking you morons for not knowing what to say without people of average intelligence here to distract it away from you.
 
So you claimed it was false. You claimed he didn't say it. Now, when you're forced to admit he said it, your defense is that he didn't mean it and didn't go through with it, so it doesn't matter? Brilliant.

Moron, he couldn't go through with it. Your concern is something Biden is doing that is not unconstitutional, yet you ignore what Trump said he wanted to do to something you claim to cherish.

This is what intelligent people call "intellectually dishonest."


You can't do anything intelligently, moron. That's the entire point of me mocking you morons for not knowing what to say without people of average intelligence here to distract it away from you.
I think you are a pathetic loser seeking attention.
 
So you claimed it was false. You claimed he didn't say it. Now, when you're forced to admit he said it, your defense is that he didn't mean it and didn't go through with it, so it doesn't matter? Brilliant.

Don't put words in my mouth I didn't admit to anything and I still say he didn't say it. All I said, was for the sake of argument, let's say he did. It's just talk that can't be acted upon.

Pedo-Joe is actively ignoring the Constitution and you support his actions and him.
 
Neither your orange jesus nor you are a person of faith. You Godless lying trumpchum sucking moron.

You are not a member of the body of Christ.


You're a Godless lying trumpchum sucking idiot.
 
The Left: "It violates the Constitution to hang the document that birthed nearly all law and principles of morality in Judeo Christian society.
This is class is Tier Three material and arguments. For the sake of the public, I hope you aren’t a trial attorney.

First of all, approximately 70% of The Ten Commandments (without going back and looking) are not illegal to commit nor are many of them immoral to do. So that utterly destroys your argument that the document “birthed nearly all law and principles of morality . . . “

Further, without The Ten Commandments, your argument is that we’d never have reached the conclusion that it’s better for society to not allow killing each other, stealing from each other, or slandering each other. Brilliant.

I wonder how all of those other non-Christian nations were able to outlaw murder, stealing, etc. without their belief/adoption of The Ten Commandments?

Oh, and the cowards still haven’t been back to this thread to thank me for correcting them and educating them.
 
This is class is Tier Three material and arguments. For the sake of the public, I hope you aren’t a trial attorney.

First of all, approximately 70% of The Ten Commandments (without going back and looking) are not illegal to commit nor are many of them immoral to do. So that utterly destroys your argument that the document “birthed nearly all law and principles of morality . . . “

Further, without The Ten Commandments, your argument is that we’d never have reached the conclusion that it’s better for society to not allow killing each other, stealing from each other, or slandering each other. Brilliant.

I wonder how all of those other non-Christian nations were able to outlaw murder, stealing, etc. without their belief/adoption of The Ten Commandments?

Oh, and the cowards still haven’t been back to this thread to thank me for correcting them and educating them.
This^^^ is some borderline retard shit, so I'm not going to waste my time writing a detailed response. I really think you may have a significant degree of brain damage from. your accident.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT