ADVERTISEMENT

TDS on overload

Yes dumbass that's exactly what it means.
No, you stupid lying trumptard oath breaker. As an example, U.S. senators used to be elected by state legislators, now they're elected by the american people. The process of election by legislature was NOT illegal before that was changed.
 
Free speech? Freedom to peacefully assemble? Must you be reminded of how Trump trampled those rights?

Yes and show how it was worse than what your tribe has done, like impeach a political opponent, in effort to remove him from office, based on a hoax of Russian Collusion. A hoax perpetuated by high-profile Democrats and blindly followed by all Democrats and their voting bleaters, like you.
 
Yes and show how it was worse than what your tribe has done, like impeach a political opponent, in effort to remove him from office, based on a hoax of Russian Collusion. A hoax perpetuated by high-profile Democrats and blindly followed by all Democrats and their voting bleaters, like you.

Key word being "blindly"...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
No, you stupid lying trumptard oath breaker. As an example, U.S. senators used to be elected by state legislators, now they're elected by the american people. The process of election by legislature was NOT illegal before that was changed.
But you dumb cocksucker the PA constitution was not changed therefore making the rule changes unconstitutional at the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
But you dumb cocksucker the PA constitution was not changed therefore making the rule changes unconstitutional at the time.
You stupid lying trumptard oath breaking god hating punk. The practices you're questioning were legal at the time of the election. That means they were neither illegal nor unconstitutional.
 
You stupid lying trumptard oath breaking god hating punk. The practices you're questioning were legal at the time of the election. That means they were neither illegal nor unconstitutional.
No there were not. The changes were not made by the legislature as required by their constitution. That is why they were ruled unconstitutional.
 
Well, here is one:

“A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution,”


Free speech? Freedom to peacefully assemble? Must you be reminded of how Trump trampled those rights?
30 you cut out the top part of this post accidentally when you replied. Please find a way to make coherent your feelings on Trump and your feelings on the constitution.
 
No there were not. The changes were not made by the legislature as required by their constitution. That is why they were ruled unconstitutional.
The practices you're questioning were legal at the time of the election.
 
Yes and show how it was worse than what your tribe has done, like impeach a political opponent, in effort to remove him from office, based on a hoax of Russian Collusion. A hoax perpetuated by high-profile Democrats and blindly followed by all Democrats and their voting bleaters, like you.
So your issue isn’t about doing away with the Constitution like your original post said. It’s that your candidate wants to do away with it a little less than you allege the other candidate does?

Brilliant. And KY Jelly and the gay selfie taker are just as dumb for liking it.
 
So your issue isn’t about doing away with the Constitution like your original post said. It’s that your candidate wants to do away with it a little less than you allege the other candidate does?

Brilliant. And KY Jelly and the gay selfie taker are just as dumb for liking it.
Trump doesn't want to do away with the Constitution.

The Constitution is in your tribe's way.

Democrats have been taken over by socialists and Marxists.
 
Trump doesn't want to do away with the Constitution.
Have a 10th grader teach you what selective bias is. You need to get away from your alt websites.

Republican politicians - many of them - spoke out against Trump after he said we should ignore the Constitution. Again, your claim doesn't match up with reality, kitty. At some point, you have to start getting embarrassed with your completely intellectual dishonest positions.
 
Have a 10th grader teach you what selective bias is. You need to get away from your alt websites.

Republican politicians - many of them - spoke out against Trump after he said we should ignore the Constitution. Again, your claim doesn't match up with reality, kitty. At some point, you have to start getting embarrassed with your completely intellectual dishonest positions.

What's your thoughts on Pedo-Joe actually ignoring the Constitution and not just talking about it?
 
What's your thoughts on Pedo-Joe actually ignoring the Constitution and not just talking about it?
Kind of like what Trump did with peacefully assembly and freedom of speech?

See, you're either not intelligent enough to be aware of these things, blatantly ignore them, or too fvcking dumb to realize that you're acknowledging that the candidate you are enamored with is voicing doing exactly what you are arguing against.
 
Trump doesn't want to do away with the Constitution.
“A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution,” he wrote. “Our great ‘Founders’ did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!”
Someone ought tell Trump that!
 
Kind of like what Trump did with peacefully assembly and freedom of speech?

See, you're either not intelligent enough to be aware of these things, blatantly ignore them, or too fvcking dumb to realize that you're acknowledging that the candidate you are enamored with is voicing doing exactly what you are arguing against.

Way to avoid the question.

Seriously: What's your thoughts on Pedo-Joe actually ignoring our Constitution and not just talking about it?
 
Having not voted for Trump but hearing daily from the left on just how terrible he is, the left has done more to convince people Biden is equally bad (not any better), only with Biden you get way more war & closer to WWIII.
 
Bbbbbbbb but Biden!
judas priest, 98% of dems can't have a conversation without screaming something TDS related. per the norm, though, a MDL takes something they're extremely well known for and pathetically attempts to turn it as if it's others that consistently do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KyMUfan
Not surprising that, in all of his incoherent rambling, @Raoul Duke MU has failed to comment on the lunacy displayed by his Leftist peers.
You sure I've never commented on the "lunacy" of actual leftists? You might want to check the archives.

And here's the truth: at this moment in time, actual leftists are a small percentage of the politically active and not a real threat. Thanks to morons like you, the far right is a clear and present danger to the United States of America.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: WVUSerg
You sure I've never commented on the "lunacy" of actual leftists? You might want to check the archives.

And here's the truth: at this moment in time, actual leftists are a small percentage of the politically active and not a real threat. Thanks to morons like you, the far right is a clear and present danger to the United States of America.

I'm not sure I'd agree with this though I guess we'd have to define far left and far right.

My perception is the far left controls the universities which control culture...which is up stream from politics. They have power in institutions even though they are barely (and often not) winning elections.

Far right to me are back woods mouth breathers with no control over capital or institutions. But if you define Trump as "far right" even though he spent us into oblivion and is fine with gay marriage....

I would say the beliefs of AOC or Tlaib or Bernie more align with the heads of higher ed than the beliefs of say MTG over any institution with any sort of power.

I think the biggest danger to the U.S. is the govt, media, major tech institutions, and higher ed being in lock step in shutting down discourse and controlling narrative. The Gated Institutional Narrative or Distrubuted Idea Suppession Complex if you will. https://theportal.wiki/wiki/The_Distributed_Idea_Suppression_Complex_(The_DISC)

I may be wrong about this though, but just some stream of consciousness thoughts.
 
Last edited:
LIke I said, it depends on labels....

If you (not meaning RD is the one saying it, but institutions absolutely do push this narrative) think a very strong border is good and racial preferences are bad...and gender zeitgeist/pronouns are bad....then label that as a "far right threat to democracy"....

Then yeah, in your world the far right is going to "threaten democracy" because they very well might win elections running against that stuff.

https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ff925c668-2c26-4e90-be00-7a95f4dc14ad_1200x636.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mlblack16.
The left's talking points have been issued. Take a shot every time they mention "Hitler" or "democracy"
 
I'm not sure I'd agree with this though I guess we'd have to define far left and far right.

My perception is the far left controls the universities which control culture...which is up stream from politics. They have power in institutions even though they are barely (and often not) winning elections.

Far right to me are back woods mouth breathers with no control over capital or institutions. But if you define Trump as "far right" even though he spent us into oblivion and is fine with gay marriage....

I would say the beliefs of AOC or Tlaib or Bernie more align with the heads of higher ed than the beliefs of say MTG over any institution with any sort of power.

I think the biggest danger to the U.S. is the govt, media, major tech institutions, and higher ed being in lock step in shutting down discourse and controlling narrative. The Gated Institutional Narrative or Distrubuted Idea Suppession Complex if you will. https://theportal.wiki/wiki/The_Distributed_Idea_Suppression_Complex_(The_DISC)

I may be wrong about this though, but just some stream of consciousness thoughts.

Excellent analysis. The Democrats have been the party of demonizing their opposition for some time, and have been known to demonize their own when necessary.

Those on the Left that you referenced, often unelected and unaccountable, do all that they can to silence any dissenting views while championing being "defenders of free speech".

All one needs to do is to witness attacks on campus conservatives and the ongoing strategy of protesting, shouting down and often canceling conservative speakers on campuses. This treatment isn't just limited to politicians either - it is any dissenting view...


And your are absolutely right about those "far-right" individuals being without any political or economic power. The Left calls their people on the fringe "disenfranchised" while trying to lump virtually everyone opposed to their agenda as "far-right"...
 
Actually it would help even more if the Left would quit calling him, and many others, Hitler... And acting like Hitler...

FbrgpoqX0AACz8M.jpg
Wonder why they cropped it so close ah there it is. Against the nation’s colors now too?



90

Edit: and that’s another “I can’t defend Trump quoting Hitler so I’m going to post a picture of Biden… talking?”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raoul Duke MU
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT