These damn judges stepping in on executive branch authority are scary

[i am herdman]

Telling the exectuive branch, the commander in chief he can't perform his constitutional duty?

What's next? They start telling him when he can order troops to a certain location?

Telling he can't enforce certain laws?

Damn liberal judges over stepping their bounds in my opinion.

 

[HerdBuckeye]

Oh I thought at least one of those judges was a "W" appointment.

 

[i am herdman]

Oh I thought at least one of those judges was a "W" appointment.

I don't care who appointed them.

 

[extragreen]

You didn't seem to have a problem with the judges barring obamas immigration order or his overtime pay order. Change of heart?

 

[Herd In the Plains]

You didn't seem to have a problem with the judges barring obamas immigration order or his overtime pay order. Change of heart?

You are about two steps behind Maxine Waters.

 

[extragreen]

You are about two steps behind Maxine Waters.

You haven't seen the light of day in years.

 

[Walter Brennaneer]

You are about two steps behind Maxine Waters.

That's cruel Plains, but so TRUE.
https://marshall.forums.rivals.com/threads/the-intellect-comedy-shows-of-liberals-continues.32529/

 

[i am herdman]

You didn't seem to have a problem with the judges barring obamas immigration order or his overtime pay order. Change of heart?

You are crazy in the head

 

[extragreen]

You are crazy in the head

Double standard much?

 

[19MU88]

I don't care who appointed them.

that's just it, republican appointments may or may not end up being constitutionalists or viewed as conservative...democrat appointees are straight up far left nut ideologues consistently

 

[HerdBuckeye]

I don't care who appointed them.

Well your opinion is incorrect in the eyes of the constitution. And is every judge a liberal??? You are entitled to your own opinion also in the constitution.

 

[i am herdman]

Well your opinion is incorrect in the eyes of the constitution. And is every judge a liberal??? You are entitled to your own opinion also in the constitution.

why is my opinion incorrect.

are judges going to start telling the president that he has no authority to send in troops to some hot spot?

 

[HerdBuckeye]

Well your opinion is incorrect in the eyes of the constitution

why is my opinion incorrect.

are judges going to start telling the president that he has no authority to send in troops to some hot spot?

why is my opinion incorrect.

are judges going to start telling the president that he has no authority to send in troops to some hot spot?

Because due process of law allows federal judges to hear challenges to executive orders. End of story no reason to say anything else. End of story.

 

[Herd Fever]

Telling the exectuive branch, the commander in chief he can't perform his constitutional duty?

What's next? They start telling him when he can order troops to a certain location?

Telling he can't enforce certain laws?

Damn liberal judges over stepping their bounds in my opinion.

Someone never learned about Checks and Balances??

 

[andy4theherd]

End of story

ok

no reason to say anything else.

got it

End of story.

absolutely

 

[CockyHerd]

Telling the exectuive branch, the commander in chief he can't perform his constitutional duty?

What's next? They start telling him when he can order troops to a certain location?

Telling he can't enforce certain laws?

Damn liberal judges over stepping their bounds in my opinion.

You mean like the President vetoing a piece of legislation or the Supreme Court overturning a unconstitutional law???

That's the way the 3 Branches of Government work, dummy.

 

[Herd Fever]

You mean like the President vetoing a piece of legislation or the Supreme Court overturning a unconstitutional law???

That's the way the 3 Branches of Government work, dummy.

Cant wait to see this pathetic government in 2 years

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

are judges going to start telling the president that he has no authority to send in troops to some hot spot?

If you believe in a strict interpretation of the Constitution, POTUS has no authority to do such a thing. James Madison was clear that what was debated was the President should have the authority to repel a sudden attack of the USA, but not to declare war or attack without the permission of Congress.

Also, it's kind of ironic a graduate of a university named after John Marshall does not understand the concept of judicial review. Seriously, man. While initially applying to legislation, with the growth of power of the executive branch it applies just as well to actions of the President.

 

[Herd Fever]

If you believe in a strict interpretation of the Constitution, POTUS has no authority to do such a thing. James Madison was clear that what was debated was the President should have the authority to repel a sudden attack of the USA, but not to declare war or attack without the permission of Congress.

Also, it's kind of ironic a graduate of a university named after John Marshall does not understand the concept of judicial review. Seriously, man. While initially applying to legislation, with the growth of power of the executive branch it applies just as well to actions of the President.

BOOM!!

 

[Walden Pond]

Boom my ass. People will look for whatever they want to confirm whatever they like. Bottom line is anybody against this thing is for turning America into a pile of third world shit.

 

[i am herdman]

Boom my ass. People will look for whatever they want to confirm whatever they like. Bottom line is anybody against this thing is for turning America into a pile of third world shit.

Walden sums it pretty correctly.

Again, these damn activist judges are stepping way out of bounds.

Legislating from the bench and now being executives from the bench.


Dangerous territory.

I can see some moron(s) or state suing when we are at war or in a case of national emergency.

How the hell can a state sue the federal government over who gets in the freaking country? And, I am big states right guy. The power clearly resides with the executive branch of the federal government.

This case should have been tossed out.

 

[Herd Fever]

Might as well send the Statue of Liberty back to France and say **** to everything this country stands for

 

[Herd Fever]

Shit it was the Saudis who financed and orcastrated 9/11

 

[Walter Brennaneer]

Shit it was the Saudis who financed and orcastrated 9/11

If a Whitey mentioned Saudis and 911 and might need castrated--it would be racism.

LMAO---learn the **** how to spell.

 

[raleighherdfan]

Might as well send the Statue of Liberty back to France and say **** to everything this country stands for

Do you even know what the Statue of Liberty stands for without looking it up?

 

[Walter Brennaneer]

Do you even know what the Statue of Liberty stands for without looking it up?

He cannot even spell orchestrated correctly. His version has someone getting neutered on Sept, 11th.

(Herd Fever replied to the thread These damn judges stepping in on executive branch authority are scary. Shit it was the Saudis who financed and orcastrated 9/11)

 

[Walden Pond]

This country stands for winners. Not shipping in a bunch of losers who can't feed themselves.

 

[i am herdman]

NO FOREIGN NATIONAL HAS A RIGHT TO ENTER THIS COUNTRY

 

[extragreen]

every single jihadist who conducted a lethal attack inside the U.S. in the post 9/11 era was either a citizen or legal resident.

 

[raleighherdfan]

Title VIII, Chapter 12 of the U.S. Code

“Whenever the president finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation — and for such period as he shall deem necessary — suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”

 

[i am herdman]

every single jihadist who conducted a lethal attack inside the U.S. in the post 9/11 era was either a citizen or legal resident.

Ok thanks. Again: NO FOREIGN NATIONAL HAS A RIGHT TO ENTER THIS COUNTRY

 

[extragreen]

Ok thanks. Again: NO FOREIGN NATIONAL HAS A RIGHT TO ENTER THIS COUNTRY

Your fear is misguided. Your chance of being killed by someone other than a terrorist is 253x greater.

 

[i am herdman]

Your fear is misguided. Your chance of being killed by someone other than a terrorist is 253x greater.

Ok thanks. They have no right to enter this country

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

Again, these damn activist judges are stepping way out of bounds.


Dangerous territory.

I can see some moron(s) or state suing when we are at war or in a case of national emergency.

Activist judge = one you don't agree with.

We just discussed what POTUS is allowed to do when under attack. Jesus.

If this had been an EO issued by Obama you would be calling him a hero that believes in the Constitution.

If you don't understand how a state can have standing to sue, educate yourself. I don't remember you bitching when states were suing over EPA regulations. Argue the decision if you wish, but not understanding the states' standing is on you.

 

[Herd Fever]

Ok thanks. They have no right to enter this country

Why dont they have a right??

 

[i am herdman]

Why dont they have a right??

you think anybody can waltz right in here? Good lord.

 

[andy4theherd]

Why dont they have a right??

a better question, why don't we teach Civics in school anymore?

 

[i am herdman]

Activist judge = one you don't agree with.

We just discussed what POTUS is allowed to do when under attack. Jesus.

If this had been an EO issued by Obama you would be calling him a hero that believes in the Constitution.

If you don't understand how a state can have standing to sue, educate yourself. I don't remember you bitching when states were suing over EPA regulations. Argue the decision if you wish, but not understanding the states' standing is on you.

Not true, I would have been for Obama putting a temp ban on.

First of all this is not the first time a President has put a temp ban on people entering from certain countries.

I can see how a state can sue, but it is not a state's job to say who can enter the country and to say who is a threat to the nation or not.

They are stripping a president of his written specific powers.

Another dangerous issue is that this may extend constitutional rights to off our shores and to non citizens who are not even in our country yet. The only time constitutional rights should enter in to play is on on our shore.

Do you want some Jihadi in Yemen that is under interrogation by the military suing in a court of law and demanding that his Miranda rights were not read?

Be careful what you wish for.

 

[HerdBuckeye]

Not true, I would have been for Obama putting a temp ban on.

First of all this is not the first time a President has put a temp ban on people entering from certain countries.

I can see how a state can sue, but it is not a state's job to say who can enter the country and to say who is a threat to the nation or not.

They are stripping a president of his written specific powers.

Another dangerous issue is that this may extend constitutional rights to off our shores and to non citizens who are not even in our country yet. The only time constitutional rights should enter in to play is on on our shore.

Do you want some Jihadi in Yemen that is under interrogation by the military suing in a court of law and demanding that his Miranda rights were not read?

Be careful what you wish for.

Your just so full of bs. All there is too it. Didn't answer his question about the states suing the EPA. What about the states suing the drug companies for the opiate problem? Believe it or not yes the states do have the right to sue. It is just that you don't agree with this. It is all protected in the constitution find something else to bitch and moan about.

 

[i am herdman]

Your just so full of bs. All there is too it. Didn't answer his question about the states suing the EPA. What about the states suing the drug companies for the opiate problem? Believe it or not yes the states do have the right to sue. It is just that you don't agree with this. It is all protected in the constitution find something else to bitch and moan about.

This isn't about the EPA.

And since when do states get involved in immigration policy. Half these damn states won't even report criminals to the feds. But, now they want to sue?
F Them

And,I am a huge states rights guy.