This was all political and the Democrats are caught red handed.
- Thread starter i am herdman
- Start date
Obstructing congress. That's laughable. Trump did what any smart person would do. Took it to court.
Really? If you were accused of something and there was evidence indicating you were guilty, you wouldn't want to clear your name if you truly were innocent? You would just ignore all of the evidence and hope the court saved you instead of clearing your name?
ET is right; you are a liar.
This is not a "normal criminal case." It's an impeachment. Different rules prevail. Unlike in the House you can't make up your own rules as you proceed.
Of course I'm right. He is definitely a liar....and he's proud of it. Makes him look presidential while the liar in chief is in office.
Moron, I already responded to this. You just quoted me saying "In a normal criminal case." By me saying that, anyone with even a bit of reading comprehension would realize that I was saying this isn't a normal criminal case. So what you're trying to argue is exactly what I said.
I then went on to say that even though this isn't a normal criminal case, executive privilege doesn't extend to what cheeto is trying to claim it does. No president has ever argued that previously, and the lower court rulings have affirmed my argument so far to this point.
Show me the evidence of Trump being guilty. And don't give me that hearsay, he said she said, my cousin's babysister's brother said, BS.
Of course. He did what any legal person would advise. He took it to court in the beggining.
That is why you are not a lawyer.
THere is not evidence and they know it. It is not about evidence. It is about trying to damage trump and trying to influence the upcoming election.
Nope, it's just more evidence that he's obstructing justice by withholding the documents and testimony of people who know thing first-hand.
That is your problem. You won't educate yourself on how these things work. He had every right to do that.
I'm not arguing he didn't have the right to do it, moron. I'm flat out stating that he's guilty of what he's accused of by the House, and more.
Yehh, like no crime nor impeachable offense. They have no evidence of anything nor a worthwhile case. It is a sad joke.
It doesn't have to be a crime as in criminal conduct. An impeachable offense is what the House says is an impeachable offense.
That hearsay is what was testified to under oath, something the liar in chief is terrified of.
Speaking of terrified. Is that why Dems didn't want repub witnesses or cross examination during Schiff's committee?
Rifle called someone a moron and EG foamed at the mouth until he could call someone a Moron. That's funny because I read rifle saying that and scrolled down to see if greed used the same word. Funnier than that was rifle telling EG he WAS RIGHT. EG answered the same way rifle would have "OF COURSE IM RIGHT. That was so funny EG sounding exactly like rifle. Scientologist and a atheist are kind of the same. Doubt either are a scientologist or a atheist but that's great news if true.
ITT we have expert legal analysis being conducted by a (forced to retire) cabinet maker and a college football coach. I'm so grateful for their valued input.
Impeachment and removal from office have different requirements. To remove the POTUS, the Demoncrats will have to prove he broke the law. PROVE that he broke the law. Otherwise, they can continue to wish in one hand and shit in the other, just like you and Rifle are doing now.
Impeachment and removal from office have different requirements. To remove the POTUS, the Demoncrats will have to prove he broke the law. PROVE that he broke the law. Otherwise, they can continue to wish in one hand and shit in the other, just like you and Rifle are doing now.
An impeachable offense occurs when a president violates the oath to abide by the constitution’s limits and respect its values. The Constitution does not mention "breaking the law" as a need for impeachment and/or removal.
Yehh you can't prove that either. There is absolutely nothing there that is an impeachable offense.
It's already been proven adequately for sane people. Just not people like you.
Yes, the House says he committed an impeachable offense. But the Senate will decide if he is guilty of said offense. You and shotgun don't have a vote.
If President Trump is so guilty, then how come no Republicans and not even all the Democrats voted for impeachment? If you can’t even get all your party to vote I would say your evidence is suspect. You even had one Democrat change parties because of the lack of evidence of the charges.
Well, unfortunately for you and your brethren, it's going to take legal proof of an actual law being broken before the GOP majority will remove him from office.
I agree. I doubt a republican majority will remove him from office. It would require 65% - 70%+ of Americans wanting him removed - I just don't see that happening.
However, Trump did abuse his office by committing an impeachable offense - that's undeniable for all except the die hards. IMO, that case was made by the Dems, but the Bolton manuscript (as reported) nails down for those who say they need "first-hand" evidence/testimony.
And then Lemmings like greed, rifle and Chevy repeat it. Pretty much the same show for the last 3-4 years. It’s amazing they never seem upset about being lied to or being made to look foolish repeating the garbage. Oh well I guess indoctrination works
