ADVERTISEMENT

U.S. spy agencies detail Russia’s role in boosting Trump

That's my point. What weak minded person would actually let something like that change their mind? People knew who they were voting for regardless.
 
if we count the money Uranium One "donated" to the Clinton Foundation it kind of evens out which side the Russians took...


Now you're going to once again falsely claim that hillary used clinton foundation money for her campaign like you did before, right? You just can't let go of false data can you. And you will continue to ignore that hillary had no ability to unilaterally approve or disapprove of the uranium purchase.
 
The admin didn't react because they thought Hillary would win. Fact.

Anyway, that's not what BC asked. He questioned if the leaks changed anyones vote. We know it didn't change yours even after your own party burned your original candidate. You happily jumped on the Hillary train because you toe that Democrat line like it's you damn job.

Not acting unilaterally because they though hillary would win is only a part of the reason. The obama administration considered doing so without bipartisan agreement would make matters worse for the election process. I'll remind you once again of a FACT:

White House officials gathered key lawmakers—leadership from the House and Senate, plus the top Democrats and Republicans from both houses’ intelligence and homeland security committees—to ask for a bipartisan condemnation of Russia’s meddling. The effort was stymied by several Republicans who weren’t willing to cooperate

As for changing anyones vote, of course it didn't, we all know that propaganda campaigns are a total waste of time and money, right? No one who jumps on the Cheetos train should open their mouth about toeing political lines.
 
That's my point. What weak minded person would actually let something like that change their mind? People knew who they were voting for regardless.

You're conveniently forgetting the weak-minded conservative voting block. You wanted something other than another establishment person, fine, I understand that. But when you get tired of pork chops on the dinner table, do you order manure? Yes, you evidently do.
 
Now you're going to once again falsely claim that hillary used clinton foundation money for her campaign like you did before, right? You just can't let go of false data can you. And you will continue to ignore that hillary had no ability to unilaterally approve or disapprove of the uranium purchase.

prove she didn't
 
tumblr_inline_odfwiqZ6aY1tvnxwa_500.gif
 
Not acting unilaterally because they though hillary would win is only a part of the reason. The obama administration considered doing so without bipartisan agreement would make matters worse for the election process. I'll remind you once again of a FACT:

White House officials gathered key lawmakers—leadership from the House and Senate, plus the top Democrats and Republicans from both houses’ intelligence and homeland security committees—to ask for a bipartisan condemnation of Russia’s meddling. The effort was stymied by several Republicans who weren’t willing to cooperate

As for changing anyones vote, of course it didn't, we all know that propaganda campaigns are a total waste of time and money, right? No one who jumps on the Cheetos train should open their mouth about toeing political lines.

This is from your quoted article:

In his campaign appearances, Obama didn’t make a big deal of the intelligence community’s October announcement, which may have helped the revelation slip out of headlines and away from the consciousness of voters.

Perhaps the latest intelligence from the CIA—that Russia was trying to help Trump win—wouldn’t have changed the outcome of the vote. But if it would have given voters reason to doubt Trump, the administration’s unwillingness to publicize the specifics of the Kremlin’s meddling may have helped cost Clinton the election. President Obama may have reason to reflect on that decision for a long time.


People should be just as concerned about POTUS inactions as they are about Russian hacking. Because he thought Clinton would win he used the no harm no foul rule. That's pretty shitty if you ask me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: andy4theherd

"I would not be a president who took vacations."
‘Build a wall’ — and make Mexico pay for it"
Temporarily ban Muslims from entering the United States
Impose tariffs on goods made in China and Mexico
Renegotiate or withdraw from the North American Free Trade Agreement and Trans-Pacific Partnership
‘Full repeal of Obamacare’ and replace it with a market-based alternative
Renegotiate the Iran deal
Leave Social Security as is
‘Bomb’ and/or ‘take the oil’ from ISIS

You cons forget one important thing from Cheetos mouth and it includes what he promised to you puffs: Everything is negotiable. bwaaahaha!!
 
the guy i voted for won. the burden of proof is on you dipshit...

i would suggest passing any ill findings on to the FBI for review (unlike the DNC did with their servers). perhaps something other than meaningless banter might come of it...
 
"I would not be a president who took vacations."
‘Build a wall’ — and make Mexico pay for it"
Temporarily ban Muslims from entering the United States
Impose tariffs on goods made in China and Mexico
Renegotiate or withdraw from the North American Free Trade Agreement and Trans-Pacific Partnership
‘Full repeal of Obamacare’ and replace it with a market-based alternative
Renegotiate the Iran deal
Leave Social Security as is
‘Bomb’ and/or ‘take the oil’ from ISIS

You cons forget one important thing from Cheetos mouth and it includes what he promised to you puffs: Everything is negotiable. bwaaahaha!!

you completely miss the point as usual. Hillary lost because of who she is. Bernie would have won. Joe Bidden probably would have won. hell, pretty much ANY candidate other than Hillary would have won.

keep blaming the Russians though...
 
the guy i voted for won. the burden of proof is on you dipshit...

i would suggest passing any ill findings on to the FBI for review (unlike the DNC did with their servers). perhaps something other than meaningless banter might come of it...

So, you lied again since you can't provide a false statement I made. Go back in your cave mouthbreather.
 
you completely miss the point as usual. Hillary lost because of who she is. Bernie would have won. Joe Bidden probably would have won. hell, pretty much ANY candidate other than Hillary would have won.

keep blaming the Russians though...

I'm not blaming the russian interference for trumps win. The fact that the russians attempted to help Cheetos win doesn't mean anything to you. Do you really think the russians saw no advantage for their agenda in helping Cheetos? Are you that blind?
 
Question for the entire board. Were you or anybody you know influenced by anything or anybody besides your own personal political beliefs?

This whole thing is hogwash.
So, you're OK with Iran doing the same interfering with the election that Russia did? It's hogwash to you because your candidate won. You're a puppet. Most Republicans are condemning what Russia did. And to those who are gleeful about it, you're a political hack. You're not a Republican. You're not a patriot. If this is not about us, then I'll never know what will be about us. Because when one party is compromised, all of us are compromised.
Of course no one wants Russia interfering with our elections. But, how did it hurt Hillary? They didn't change any votes or mess with the machines or vote count.

We conduct propaganda campaigns all the time in other countries.

Sounds like the Democrats need to up their security and so did the Obama admin. More importantly, the Democrats had a terrible candidate.
 
Of course no one wants Russia interfering with our elections. But, how did it hurt Hillary? They didn't change any votes or mess with the machines or vote count.

We conduct propaganda campaigns all the time in other countries.

Sounds like the Democrats need to up their security and so did the Obama admin. More importantly, the Democrats had a terrible candidate.

If russia interfering in our elections doesn't change any votes or mess with the machines or vote count, then why do you not want them to interfere? Are you really stating that propaganda campaigns never produce any results?
 
the guy i voted for won. the burden of proof is on you dipshit...

i would suggest passing any ill findings on to the FBI for review (unlike the DNC did with their servers). perhaps something other than meaningless banter might come of it...

Yep. There's a whole new layer with this onion.
 
If russia interfering in our elections doesn't change any votes or mess with the machines or vote count, then why do you not want them to interfere? Are you really stating that propaganda campaigns never produce any results?

Are you saying they influenced the people in 30 plus states to vote for Trump by a majority?
 
Ah, so you want findings passed to the FBI? So you can declare they don't know what they're talking about. Or maybe just "get on with our lives"?

The Dems didn't cooperate with an FBI investigation. You don't think that's strange, especially with the hell they've raised since the election?
 
Are you saying they influenced the people in 30 plus states to vote for Trump by a majority?

Are you really stating that propaganda campaigns never produce any results? Maybe you should relay this information to the United States government.
 
The blacks and Jackie Robinson fawners stayed home. That's why she lost. They didn't stay home because of Putin. They stayed home because Hillary's just an old white woman and they wanted another at least half black man. Wanted Obama to stay the president and to be made the king.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Walter Brennaneer
When haven't I believed the FBI? This isn't about me, it's about a breech of security that's so serious Dems want to delegitimize the election but not so serious that they'll allow the FBI to do its job. Weird.
 
When haven't I believed the FBI? This isn't about me, it's about a breech of security that's so serious Dems want to delegitimize the election but not so serious that they'll allow the FBI to do its job. Weird.

It isn't about democrats. It's about russia attempting to determine who will be president of the United States, and WHY Cheetos was their pick. That skips right over the top of every cons head on this board, and will continue to do so.
 
JFC. It's the Dems who ignored Russia as a foe that lead to this. The Dems own this, and that skips right over your head and will continue to do so.
 
JFC. It's the Dems who ignored Russia as a foe that lead to this. The Dems own this, and that skips right over your head and will continue to do so.

You continue to offer a lie as a defense. No doubt you will continue to do so. I'll say it once again, if obama had exposed the info about russia unilaterally, cons would have screamed that obama was unnecessarily attempting to affect the election. Republicans then put party over country and said "no" we're not going to be a part of something that, however true, will hurt the chance of Cheetos getting elected.

White House officials gathered key lawmakers—leadership from the House and Senate, plus the top Democrats and Republicans from both houses’ intelligence and homeland security committees—to ask for a bipartisan condemnation of Russia’s meddling. The effort was stymied by several Republicans who weren’t willing to cooperate
 
We're supposed to be afraid of the Russians buying us off now? Well, I'm just...not. Talk about the JV team.
 
Greed---let me simplify: Your team lost and not only lost got their junk kicked beyond any estimates. You bought into the media bullshit that Hillary was running away with the election. Actually, she ran away after her wide ass was crushed by Donald Trump.

Your continuous objections are falling on death ears. To help you better come to grips with the loss answer this. Do you actually think, you, of all people, are going to make a difference?

Give it break--your team lost. Get over it!

Your continuous googling attempts in trying to impress people has become just a laughable minute for all.
 
"If this... then that would've happened."

once again the basis for your entire defence is hypotheticals.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT