Since 2001...Illinois posted winning seasons 5 times. 2 of those being major BCS bowls, 2001 and 2007.
Since 2001...NIU posted 2 SEASONS NOT REACHING A BOWL, 2007, and 2016...with their most recent major BCS bowl being in 2012...2 years before we got them.
In a 16 year span...
Illinois' winning seasons 5/16.
NIU's winning seasons 14/16.
I think if you compared these two, NIU is for sure the better team and earned more respect in that time than Illinois did.
Now, if Illinois posted some winning seasons more consistently, then I would agree with your statement. Thing is, they aren't likely to get anywhere anytime soon.
I also would like to add that this sort of criteria doesn't apply to everyone. It certainly doesn't apply to Illinois the way it would apply to someone like Texas, Louisville, Oregon, FSU, Clemson, K-State, Ole Miss, Arkansas, etc., teams who may not have much in terms of winning but are very recognizable. Even Maryland, I would put in there...Under Armour and their whole sort of brand is somewhat recognizable...but that's about the limit for me, in my opinion.
I know I'm contradicting myself a bit, but I still say, outside of NIU and UI, the majority of college fans (keep in mind they couldn't quote a single statistic you listed) would have the "perception" that Illinois was a more impressive win than NIU, simply because they're B1G.
I'm not saying I agree with the notion, at all, but that's the mindset of probably the overwhelming majority of so-called college football fans today, which would create the national perception of teams' performances.
Last edited: