ADVERTISEMENT

Who do you think of in reading the following?

I voted for him because he was the best candidate and the elites in DC needed a wake up call.

I am guessing you voted for Hillary because she is Mother Theresa and has all those redeeming character traits.

No, you didn't. You voted for cheetos because he had an R beside his name. You didn't come out for him until after he won the primary, and you stated he didn't have a chance to win against her. The "elites" in DC were a republican controlled House and Senate, just so you know. I understand the "wake up call" sentiment, but you don't send a plumber to perform open heart surgery just because you don't think the hospital is being run the way you like.
 
No, you didn't. You voted for cheetos because he had an R beside his name. You didn't come out for him until after he won the primary, and you stated he didn't have a chance to win against her. The "elites" in DC were a republican controlled House and Senate, just so you know. I understand the "wake up call" sentiment, but you don't send a plumber to perform open heart surgery just because you don't think the hospital is being run the way you like.
You are full of it. I voted for him in the primary and endorsed him early on.

I didn't think he could beat her. By God, he pulled it off. One of the greatest upsets, ever! He kept fighting back unlike other lame Republicans who ran.

Of course the elites were Republicans as well. I wanted them taught a lesson too! Don't you get that???

I was for Trump all the way.
 
Not on this board, you didn't.
OKkkkkkkkkkkkk. I don't vote on this board and I believe I did support him on this board early on and was loving it how he was sticking it to the other Republicans. I remember Walden and I loving every moment of it.
 
No, you didn't support trump early on this board. At the time you were convinced he was the least able to beat hillary.
 
No, you didn't support trump early on this board. At the time you were convinced he was the least able to beat hillary.

E.T., you simply cannot discuss things with deplorables. They have too much of a habit to lie.

Look at Murox the Moron. He supported, for months, cheeto on here. Then, just hours before the election, he posted that he didn't support him and definitely wasn't voting for him. Then, a year after the election, he came on here claiming that he actually did vote for cheeto.
 
No posts of yours were deleted in this thread.

kwike.jpg
Ok I know I replied to EG but being on my phone I guess it didn’t get posted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ARandomHerdFan
Says the guy that’s been banned atleast twice for being an angry confrontational asshole

That would be suspended, moron.

And we all know why he is suspended while other posters get a free pass. It is a personal vendetta by one or two moderators against E.T. which is why none of the moderators will accept responsibility for suspending him unfairly.

Listen, I call out E.T. and argue with him as much as anyone. But suspending him for calling somebody a "pillhead"? You have to fvcking be kidding me.
 
That would be suspended, moron.

And we all know why he is suspended while other posters get a free pass. It is a personal vendetta by one or two moderators against E.T. which is why none of the moderators will accept responsibility for suspending him unfairly.

Listen, I call out E.T. and argue with him as much as anyone. But suspending him for calling somebody a "pillhead"? You have to fvcking be kidding me.
Banned suspended it’s the same thing as enlist and enroll.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThunderCat98
Yet you’ve been banned repeatedly for being an angry asshole

Wrong, moron. I got banned because some people with the nuclear codes can dish it out but they can't take it. To say otherwise makes you either a moron, liar, or both.
 
And I'll repeat what I told you cons (I believe it was the night of the election), that when you voted for trump you lost your ability to attack anyone for voting for someone with a D beside their name. Because you voted for cheetos simply and only because he had an R beside his name. "Some character flaws"? That's rich. His character has nothing but flaws. And unless you call "seat of the pants" a policy, he has none. cheetos doesn't have the ability or intelligence to form policy. Whoever from the right yells loud enough is the "winner" of the day. Same goes for you herdman.

All that bashing and yet, he has accomplished far more than any cabinet maker from OW that we know.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT