ADVERTISEMENT

ANOTHER WHISTLE BLOWER: CROOKED TRIED TO FIX HIS IRS AUDIT

Trump Employs an Old Tactic: Using Race for Gain
For the fourth season of “The Apprentice,” Donald J. Trump searched for a gimmick to bolster ratings. His idea was simple if explosive — pit an all-white team against an all-black team.

“Do you like it?” he asked, previewing the concept on Howard Stern’s radio show in April 2005.

“Yes,” Mr. Stern said.

“Do you like it?” Mr. Trump asked Robin Quivers, the African-American co-host.

“Well,” she said, “I think you’re going to have a riot.”

That gave Mr. Trump no pause. “It would be the highest-rated show on television,” he exulted.

“See, actually, I don’t think it would,” Mr. Trump replied. “I think that it would be handled very beautifully by me. Because, as you know, I’m very diplomatic.”

Mr. Stern agreed. “I gotta tell you something, on some level it’s wrong,” he went on. “But I like it. I like it. I would watch.”

“You’d have to,” Ms. Quivers replied, “because you’d want to know when the riot starts.”

Long before he ignited a firestorm by telling four Democratic congresswomen of color to “go back” to their home countries, even though three were born in the United States and all are citizens, Mr. Trump sought to pit Americans against one another along racial lines.

ver decades in business, entertainment and now politics, Mr. Trump has approached America’s racial, ethnic and religious divisions opportunistically, not as the nation’s wounds to be healed but as openings to achieve his goals, whether they be ratings, fame, money or power, without regard for adverse consequences.

He was accused by government investigators in the 1970s of refusing to rent apartments to black tenants (he denied it but settled the case) and made a name for himself in the 1980s championing the death penalty for five black and Hispanic rape suspects who were later exonerated. He threatened to sell his Mar-a-Lago estate to the Unification Church in 1991 and unleash “thousands of Moonies” if city officials in Palm Beach, Fla., did not allow him to carve up his property.

Taking on competitors of his Atlantic City casinos, he questioned whether rival owners were really Native Americans entitled to federal recognition — then later teamed up with another tribe when there was money to be made. With his eye on the White House, he opened a yearslong drive to convince Americans that President Barack Obama was really born in Africa.

But the longer Mr. Trump spends on the stage, the more friends and former employees, like Michael D. Cohen, Omarosa Manigault Newman and Anthony Scaramucci, have concluded that he is more racist than they had admitted.

“Let me be clear: Donald Trump is a disgusting, filthy, petty racist and he is trying to start a race war in this country and what we saw this week is just the beginning,” said Ms. Manigault Newman, a former “Apprentice” star fired after a stint in the White House.

Mr. Scaramucci, who briefly served as White House communications director, wrote on Twitter that Mr. Trump would never have told a white immigrant to go back to his country. “That’s why the comments were racist and unacceptable,” he said, remarks that got him disinvited from a Republican fund-raiser.

For some who defended Mr. Trump against charges of racism in the past, this was a turning point. “As much as I have denied it and averted my eyes from it, this latest incident made it impossible,” Geraldo Rivera, a roaming correspondent at large for Fox News and longtime friend, said in an interview.

“My friendship with the president has cost me friendships, it has cost me schisms in the family, my wife and I are constantly at odds about the president,” he added. “I do insist that he’s been treated unfairly. But the unmistakable words, the literal words he said, is an indication that the critics were much more right than I.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/20/us/politics/trump-race-record.html?action=click&module=Top Stories&pgtype=Homepage
 
The Myth of the Kindly General Lee

The myth of Lee goes something like this: He was a brilliant strategist and devoted Christian man who abhorred slavery and labored tirelessly after the war to bring the country back together.

There is little truth in this. Lee was a devout Christian, and historians regard him as an accomplished tactician. But despite his ability to win individual battles, his decision to fight a conventional war against the more densely populated and industrialized North is considered by many historians to have been a fatal strategic error.

But even if one conceded Lee’s military prowess, he would still be responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans in defense of the South’s authority to own millions of human beings as property because they are black. Lee’s elevation is a key part of a 150-year-old propaganda campaign designed to erase slavery as the cause of the war and whitewash the Confederate cause as a noble one. That ideology is known as the Lost Cause, and as historian David Blight writes, it provided a “foundation on which Southerners built the Jim Crow system.”

Lee was a slaveowner—his own views on slavery were explicated in an 1856 letter that it often misquoted to give the impression that Lee was some kind of an abolitionist. In the letter, he describes slavery as “a moral & political evil,” but goes on to explain that:

I think it however a greater evil to the white man than to the black race, & while my feelings are strongly enlisted in behalf of the latter, my sympathies are more strong for the former. The blacks are immeasurably better off here than in Africa, morally, socially & physically. The painful discipline they are undergoing, is necessary for their instruction as a race, & I hope will prepare & lead them to better things. How long their subjugation may be necessary is known & ordered by a wise Merciful Providence. Their emancipation will sooner result from the mild & melting influence of Christianity, than the storms & tempests of fiery Controversy.

The argument here is that slavery is bad for white people, good for black people, and most importantly, it is better than abolitionism; emancipation must wait for divine intervention. That black people might not want to be slaves does not enter into the equation; their opinion on the subject of their own bondage is not even an afterthought to Lee.

Lee’s cruelty as a slavemaster was not confined to physical punishment. In Reading the Man, the historian Elizabeth Brown Pryor’s portrait of Lee through his writings, Pryor writes that “Lee ruptured the Washington and Custis tradition of respecting slave families,” by hiring them off to other plantations, and that “by 1860 he had broken up every family but one on the estate, some of whom had been together since Mount Vernon days.” The separation of slave families was one of the most unfathomably devastating aspects of slavery, and Pryor wrote that Lee’s slaves regarded him as “the worst man I ever see.”

The trauma of rupturing families lasted lifetimes for the enslaved—it was, as my colleague Ta-Nehisi Coates described it, “a kind of murder.” After the war, thousands of the emancipated searched desperately for kin lost to the market for human flesh, fruitlessly for most. In Reconstruction, the historian Eric Foner quotes a Freedmen’s Bureau agent who notes of the emancipated, “in their eyes, the work of emancipation was incomplete until the families which had been dispersed by slavery were reunited.”

Lee’s heavy hand on the Arlington plantation, Pryor writes, nearly led to a slave revolt, in part because the enslaved had been expected to be freed upon their previous master’s death, and Lee had engaged in a dubious legal interpretation of his will in order to keep them as his property, one that lasted until a Virginia court forced him to free them.

When two of his slaves escaped and were recaptured, Lee either beat them himself or ordered the overseer to "lay it on well." Wesley Norris, one of the slaves who was whipped, recalled that “not satisfied with simply lacerating our naked flesh, Gen. Lee then ordered the overseer to thoroughly wash our backs with brine, which was done.”

Every state that seceded mentioned slavery as the cause in their declarations of secession. Lee’s beloved Virginia was no different, accusing the federal government of “perverting” its powers “not only to the injury of the people of Virginia, but to the oppression of the Southern Slaveholding States.” Lee’s decision to fight for the South can only be described as a choice to fight for the continued existence of human bondage in America—even though for the Union, it was not at first a war for emancipation.

During his invasion of Pennsylvania, Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia enslaved free blacks and brought them back to the South as property. Pryor writes that “evidence links virtually every infantry and cavalry unit in Lee’s army” with the abduction of free black Americans, “with the activity under the supervision of senior officers.”
.

https://getpocket.com/explore/item/the-myth-of-the-kindly-general-lee?utm_source=pocket-newtab
 
Last edited:
Trump Employs an Old Tactic: Using Race for Gain
For the fourth season of “The Apprentice,” Donald J. Trump searched for a gimmick to bolster ratings. His idea was simple if explosive — pit an all-white team against an all-black team.

“Do you like it?” he asked, previewing the concept on Howard Stern’s radio show in April 2005.

“Yes,” Mr. Stern said.

“Do you like it?” Mr. Trump asked Robin Quivers, the African-American co-host.

“Well,” she said, “I think you’re going to have a riot.”

That gave Mr. Trump no pause. “It would be the highest-rated show on television,” he exulted.

“See, actually, I don’t think it would,” Mr. Trump replied. “I think that it would be handled very beautifully by me. Because, as you know, I’m very diplomatic.”

Mr. Stern agreed. “I gotta tell you something, on some level it’s wrong,” he went on. “But I like it. I like it. I would watch.”

“You’d have to,” Ms. Quivers replied, “because you’d want to know when the riot starts.”

Long before he ignited a firestorm by telling four Democratic congresswomen of color to “go back” to their home countries, even though three were born in the United States and all are citizens, Mr. Trump sought to pit Americans against one another along racial lines.

ver decades in business, entertainment and now politics, Mr. Trump has approached America’s racial, ethnic and religious divisions opportunistically, not as the nation’s wounds to be healed but as openings to achieve his goals, whether they be ratings, fame, money or power, without regard for adverse consequences.

He was accused by government investigators in the 1970s of refusing to rent apartments to black tenants (he denied it but settled the case) and made a name for himself in the 1980s championing the death penalty for five black and Hispanic rape suspects who were later exonerated. He threatened to sell his Mar-a-Lago estate to the Unification Church in 1991 and unleash “thousands of Moonies” if city officials in Palm Beach, Fla., did not allow him to carve up his property.

Taking on competitors of his Atlantic City casinos, he questioned whether rival owners were really Native Americans entitled to federal recognition — then later teamed up with another tribe when there was money to be made. With his eye on the White House, he opened a yearslong drive to convince Americans that President Barack Obama was really born in Africa.

But the longer Mr. Trump spends on the stage, the more friends and former employees, like Michael D. Cohen, Omarosa Manigault Newman and Anthony Scaramucci, have concluded that he is more racist than they had admitted.

“Let me be clear: Donald Trump is a disgusting, filthy, petty racist and he is trying to start a race war in this country and what we saw this week is just the beginning,” said Ms. Manigault Newman, a former “Apprentice” star fired after a stint in the White House.

Mr. Scaramucci, who briefly served as White House communications director, wrote on Twitter that Mr. Trump would never have told a white immigrant to go back to his country. “That’s why the comments were racist and unacceptable,” he said, remarks that got him disinvited from a Republican fund-raiser.

For some who defended Mr. Trump against charges of racism in the past, this was a turning point. “As much as I have denied it and averted my eyes from it, this latest incident made it impossible,” Geraldo Rivera, a roaming correspondent at large for Fox News and longtime friend, said in an interview.

“My friendship with the president has cost me friendships, it has cost me schisms in the family, my wife and I are constantly at odds about the president,” he added. “I do insist that he’s been treated unfairly. But the unmistakable words, the literal words he said, is an indication that the critics were much more right than I.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/20/us/politics/trump-race-record.html?action=click&module=Top Stories&pgtype=Homepage
You’ve got him now!
 
DEVOS IS A CROOK TOO
DEVOS IS A CROOK TOO - THEY ALL ARE - NO ONE SINGLE HONEST PERSON IN THE ENTIRE REPUBLICAN PARTY

Instead of requiring Dream Center to take action, “the department informed Dream Center executives that it would work to retroactively accredit the institutions during the periods they had lied to students — rewriting history to erase Dream Center’s deceptive marketing practices,” Mr. Scott wrote.

Dream Center Education Holdings, a subsidiary of a Los Angeles-based megachurch, had no experience in higher education when it petitioned the federal Education Department to let it take over a troubled chain of for-profit trade schools.

But the organization’s chairman, Randall K. Barton, told the education secretary, Betsy DeVos, that the foundation wanted to “help people live better lives.”

The purchase was blessed despite Dream Center’s lack of experience and questionable finances by an administration favorable to for-profit education. But barely a year later, the company tumbled into insolvency, dozens of its colleges closed abruptly and thousands of students were left with no degree after paying tens of thousands of dollars in tuition.

Making matters worse, the college is accused of enrolling new students and taking their taxpayer-supported financial aid dollars even after some of its campuses had lost their accreditation, which rendered their credits worthless.

Company emails, documents and recordings show that part of why Dream Center kept going is that it thought the Education Department, which under Ms. DeVos has rolled back regulations on for-profit education, would try to keep it from failing. Mr. Barton emailed other Dream Center executives that the department’s head of higher education policy — Diane Auer Jones, a former executive and lobbyist for for-profit colleges — had pulled strings to help the company’s schools in their effort to regain a seal of approval from an accreditor, despite their perilous positions.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/23/...tion=click&module=Top Stories&pgtype=Homepage
 
WHY DON'T YOU DO SOMETHING USEFUL - LIKE FINISH CLEANING THE TOILET BOWLS LIKE YOUR
BOSS TOLD YOU.

WHEN YOU GET FINISHED WITH THAT FIND A REPUBLICAN POLITICIAN AND LICK THE DOG
CRAP OFF THE BOTTOM OF HIS SHOES.
 
Dream Center Education Holdings, a subsidiary of a Los Angeles-based megachurch,

This is usually a clue money will be stolen.

It's no difference from the Catholics buying up hospitals and stealing money by running them into the ground or by accepting federal dollars and then restricting care based on religious bullshit.

Big Time Organized Religion is a scam to make money. If profiteering appears in the House of God, you know some shit is up. Remember who Jesus took the whip to....
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThunderCat98
WHY DON'T YOU DO SOMETHING USEFUL - LIKE FINISH CLEANING THE TOILET BOWLS LIKE YOUR
BOSS TOLD YOU.

WHEN YOU GET FINISHED WITH THAT FIND A REPUBLICAN POLITICIAN AND LICK THE DOG
CRAP OFF THE BOTTOM OF HIS SHOES.

Are you ok?
 
50 MILLION ILLEGAL MEXICANS IN THE USA - TRUMP CAN ONLY FIND 35

WHAT A BUNCH OF BOOBS, 20 MILLION OF THEM VOTED IN CALIFORNIA ALONE GIVING HILLARY THE POPULAR VOTE. I MEAN HOW BIG AN IDIOT DO YOU HAVE TO BE TO FIND ONLY 35 OUT OF 50,000,000
ILLEGAL MEXICANS. I COULD WALK AROUND HERDMANS NEIGHBORHOOD 5 MINUTES AND FIND A THOUSAND.

A recent wave ofroundups by immigration authoritiestargeting undocumented families with final orders of removal — a crackdown actively pushed by President Trump — yielded few apprehensions.
The sweeps, which targeted about 2,000 families, resulted in 35 people being apprehended by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, the agency announced Tuesday. Among them were 18 members of the families targeted and 17 so-called "collateral arrests" — apprehensions of people who are undocumented but who were not directly targeted by the operation.

"COLLATERAL ARRESTS PROBABLY TURNED THEMSEVES IN.
NO WONDER THE RUSSIANS WANTED CROOKED IN POWER.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ice-sweeps-pushed-by-trump-to-target-undocumented-families-yield-few-arrests/
 
Last edited:
You must be a miserable as 70% of the people you hate are Trump voters from West Virgina.Most people do not spend time hating others as you do.If you ever go to a game why don’t you wear a sticker saying Dherd so we know to stay away from you.
 
You must be a miserable as 70% of the people you hate are Trump voters from West Virgina.Most people do not spend time hating others as you do.If you ever go to a game why don’t you wear a sticker saying Dherd so we know to stay away from you.

You don't have to read anything dherd posts. This entire thread is devoted to one poster, and you certainly don't have to post a reply.
 
Either Raoul is slipping or he's trying to be nice for a change.

Neither, it is just something I feel very strongly about.

@wvkeeper(HN) preaches, ministers to his town, and takes a very modest salary on which he provides for his family. No mansion, no luxury cars. That's how it should be done. Tithing is to support the church, the actual building and its bills, and to minister to the community. If someone builds a 10k member church I guess that's cool, but they can get by with a ranch home and a Kia. And not the Kia Stinger lol.

The Prince of Peace actually picked up a whip and beat the asses of those profiting off the Temple. I think we are safe to assume money grubbing in religion is really high on His list of Things Not to Do.
 
What’s next? Sky is blue?


tenor.gif
 
No. He did not.

"And making a whip of cords, he drove them all out of the temple, with the sheep and oxen. And he poured out the coins of the money-changers and overturned their tables." John 2

I don't know if you have ever handled a whip, but the only way it is effective is to start whipping people with it. That's all a whip is for...to fvcking whip. That whip cracks your ass, you know it is time to GTFO.

If Jesus just stood there with it, zero fvcks would have been given.

You can believe he put whip on flesh. Or you can be an idiot.
 
"And making a whip of cords, he drove them all out of the temple, with the sheep and oxen. And he poured out the coins of the money-changers and overturned their tables." John 2

I don't know if you have ever handled a whip, but the only way it is effective is to start whipping people with it. That's all a whip is for...to fvcking whip. That whip cracks your ass, you know it is time to GTFO.

If Jesus just stood there with it, zero fvcks would have been given.

You can believe he put whip on flesh. Or you can be an idiot.

If YOU walked into a money hungry mega church and flogged a bunch of people there with a whip, would you be committing a sin?
 
If YOU walked into a money hungry mega church and flogged a bunch of people there with a whip, would you be committing a sin?

What a dumb question. It is not my place to judge. But it is His. So if you are suggesting Christ sinned by judging and dishing out judgement, which is His job, you are not very bright.

St Paul in Ephesians tells us to be angry, but do not sin, anger and malice are different things. Anger with just cause. St Thomas Aquinas discussed this, vengeance is the Lord's (Deuteronomy 35), but righteous anger is fine as long as vengeance is not ours, as long as anger does not lead to "violence of mind and body". Christ's anger at the money changers was just and righteous (and this is our lesson from this)....his action, putting whip on flesh, was His vengeance.

Me personally, I'd like to take the whip to Olsteen and his ilk, but I've never claimed to be perfect. And Raoul Duke would definitely take to the alter with a whip in one hand and a bottle of whisky in the other, and a Ruger Super Redhawk on his hip.
 
You will find no place in the New Testament where Christ struck someone with anything. I've said for some time now you don't understand much if anything about the Bible. You continue to prove me correct.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT