Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bushes
Why are so many Christians illiterate
Bushes
Tied to
Why are so many Christians illiterate?
I never thought you could top your post of the two dudes at a baseball game.Bushes
Tied to
Why are so many Christians illiterate?
LIKE I'VE BEEN TELLING YOUR FOR YEARS - THE ENTIRE REPUBLICAN PARTY IS CORRUPT FROM TOP TO BOTTOM - NOTHING BUT A BUNCH OF LIARS CHEATS MONEY GRUBBING CON MEN LOOKING OUT FOR NOBODY BUT THEMSELVES AND LIVING LIKE KINGS - ALWAYS LOOKING FOR A WAY TO GET ANOTHER DOLLAR - DO NOT CARE A NICKLES WORTH ABOUT THE COUNTRY.
A CORRUPT REPUBLICAN ISNT EVEN NEWS ANYMORE - EVERYONE JUST TAKES IT FOR GRANTED.
so, are you saying @countryroads89 not only needs lessons re: debt vs deficit, he also needs grammar lessons? wtf, did this guy quit school in the 4th grade?I never thought you could top your post of the two dudes at a baseball game.
I never thought you could top your post of the two dudes at a baseball game.
Sibilants are your friend...
"Here are some other correct examples of names that end in sibilants and are thus made plural by adding es:
- Happy holidays from the Bushes (plural form of the name Bush)
- Happy holidays from the Birches (plural form of the name Birch)
- Happy holidays from the Joneses (plural form of the name Jones)
- Happy holidays from the Foxes (plural form of the name Fox)"
https://getitwriteonline.com/articles/signing-holiday-greeting-cards/
Yet this wasn't a plural of the family name.
Reading can be your friend.
Never said it was. I was responding to Keep's response...
"Bush as a family name doesn't get pluralized into the plural form of the noun bush."
You can't do spelling snark, especially when you get both wrong.
Bush as a family name doesn't get pluralized into the plural form of the noun bush.
"Tied into" denotes involvement.
so, are you saying @countryroads89 not only needs lessons re: debt vs deficit, he also needs grammar lessons? wtf, did this guy quit school in the 4th grade?
Maybe he was disbarred for poor grammar?
Yet this wasn't a plural of the family name.
Reading can be your friend.
Care to explain the grammar issues to us ignorants?
@countryroads89 you are a fvcking idiot.
Read the 1st sentence in the tweet. It's not plural. If you're that goddamn stupid, then there's truly ZERO hope for you.
As you'll clearly see, he stayed the hell away from this thread until GK gave him some hope.
No the tweets first sentence specifically references Jeb not jeb and NeilYes it is plural. It is talking about both Neil and Jeb, the Bushes.
No the tweets first sentence specifically references Jeb not jeb and Neil
Yes it is plural. It is talking about both Neil and Jeb, the Bushes.
I made no reference to the text before the tweet. I will give you the thread title is vague and missing a word that would clarify.And the text before the tweet references both Neil and Jeb. You might want to check out post 5.
No, mouth breather, you are dead wrong.
Tell you what, if you have any relatives who know how to read, have them read the following quote from the tweet in the OP, "Right to Rise, Jeb Bush's super-PAC..."
Once that person reads it to you, then be sure to ask the difference between plural and possessive. Don't get crazy and ask about plural possessive. I fear that will make your head explode.
You are a f’ucking idiot. You actually think it’s proper to use a possessive form of a word, followed by no object, which the possessive word is reffing to, and then follow that possessive word with a verb.
Just stop with the deflection. You were wrong; suck it up and admit it. Read the fvcking tweet and stop embarrassing yourself.
Identify for us the word that is the object of the possession.
I’ll hang up and wait for your answer.
You are being deliberately ignorant at this point. No one is this fvcking dumb. You're not going to get a pass on this one, no matter how much you try. We will just add this to your running list of screw-ups
I realize if I try and reverse my position, I will look like a spineless twit.
I know that "super-PAC" is the object in the sentence, and I'm playing it off as if somehow that part doesn't count. "Jeb Bush's super-PAC," is the same thing as saying Jeb Bush's car, Jeb Bush's house, etc. I also know that "Bushes" would only be used if it were an object possessed by the entire family, for instance, "the Bushes family residence," but I'm gonna keep acting like this so these guys will think there's some obscure grammar rule which would somehow make my argument valid.
As you'll clearly see, he stayed the hell away from this thread until GK gave him some hope.
FFS. I called out the stupidity last night. It was blatant. I didn’t “need help.”