ADVERTISEMENT

Bush's Tied Into Chinese Collusion in 2016 Elections

Bushes

Tied to

Why are so many Christians illiterate?
3783956-row-of-green-bushes-in-a-park.jpg
 
LIKE I'VE BEEN TELLING YOUR FOR YEARS - THE ENTIRE REPUBLICAN PARTY IS CORRUPT FROM TOP TO BOTTOM - NOTHING BUT A BUNCH OF LIARS CHEATS MONEY GRUBBING CON MEN LOOKING OUT FOR NOBODY BUT THEMSELVES AND LIVING LIKE KINGS - ALWAYS LOOKING FOR A WAY TO GET ANOTHER DOLLAR - DO NOT CARE A NICKLES WORTH ABOUT THE COUNTRY.

A CORRUPT REPUBLICAN ISNT EVEN NEWS ANYMORE - EVERYONE JUST TAKES IT FOR GRANTED.
 
LIKE I'VE BEEN TELLING YOUR FOR YEARS - THE ENTIRE REPUBLICAN PARTY IS CORRUPT FROM TOP TO BOTTOM - NOTHING BUT A BUNCH OF LIARS CHEATS MONEY GRUBBING CON MEN LOOKING OUT FOR NOBODY BUT THEMSELVES AND LIVING LIKE KINGS - ALWAYS LOOKING FOR A WAY TO GET ANOTHER DOLLAR - DO NOT CARE A NICKLES WORTH ABOUT THE COUNTRY.

A CORRUPT REPUBLICAN ISNT EVEN NEWS ANYMORE - EVERYONE JUST TAKES IT FOR GRANTED.

Again with the inappropriate outbursts from our resident PSYCHO.

Seriously, Dtard, go run out into heavy traffic, preferably with a blindfold.
 
Sibilants are your friend...


"Here are some other correct examples of names that end in sibilants and are thus made plural by adding es:

  • Happy holidays from the Bushes (plural form of the name Bush)
  • Happy holidays from the Birches (plural form of the name Birch)
  • Happy holidays from the Joneses (plural form of the name Jones)
  • Happy holidays from the Foxes (plural form of the name Fox)"

https://getitwriteonline.com/articles/signing-holiday-greeting-cards/
 
Sibilants are your friend...


"Here are some other correct examples of names that end in sibilants and are thus made plural by adding es:

  • Happy holidays from the Bushes (plural form of the name Bush)
  • Happy holidays from the Birches (plural form of the name Birch)
  • Happy holidays from the Joneses (plural form of the name Jones)
  • Happy holidays from the Foxes (plural form of the name Fox)"

https://getitwriteonline.com/articles/signing-holiday-greeting-cards/

Yet this wasn't a plural of the family name.

Reading can be your friend.
 
Yet this wasn't a plural of the family name.

Reading can be your friend.

Never said it was. I was responding to Keep's response...

"Bush as a family name doesn't get pluralized into the plural form of the noun bush."
 
@countryroads89 you are a fvcking idiot.

Read the 1st sentence in the tweet. It's not plural. If you're that goddamn stupid, then there's truly ZERO hope for you.
 
As others have noted the tweet itself uses "Bush's", which is where the "Bush's" in the title comes from, which is the point I was making in the follow up.

GK was answering a question I wasn't posing.
 
Yes it is plural. It is talking about both Neil and Jeb, the Bushes.

No, mouth breather, you are dead wrong.

Tell you what, if you have any relatives who know how to read, have them read the following quote from the tweet in the OP, "Right to Rise, Jeb Bush's super-PAC..."

Once that person reads it to you, then be sure to ask the difference between plural and possessive. Don't get crazy and ask about plural possessive. I fear that will make your head explode.
 
No, mouth breather, you are dead wrong.

Tell you what, if you have any relatives who know how to read, have them read the following quote from the tweet in the OP, "Right to Rise, Jeb Bush's super-PAC..."

Once that person reads it to you, then be sure to ask the difference between plural and possessive. Don't get crazy and ask about plural possessive. I fear that will make your head explode.

You are a f’ucking idiot. You actually think it’s proper to use a possessive form of a word, followed by no object, which the possessive word is reffing to, and then follow that possessive word with a verb.
 
You are a f’ucking idiot. You actually think it’s proper to use a possessive form of a word, followed by no object, which the possessive word is reffing to, and then follow that possessive word with a verb.

Just stop with the deflection. You were wrong; suck it up and admit it. Read the fvcking tweet and stop embarrassing yourself.
 
Identify for us the word that is the object of the possession.

I’ll hang up and wait for your answer.

You are being deliberately ignorant at this point. No one is this fvcking dumb. You're not going to get a pass on this one, no matter how much you try. We will just add this to your running list of screw-ups
 
doesn't understand plural vs. possessive, debt vs. deficit . . . what next for this junior einstein mishap?
 
You are being deliberately ignorant at this point. No one is this fvcking dumb. You're not going to get a pass on this one, no matter how much you try. We will just add this to your running list of screw-ups

LMAO! I love it. You are so f'ucking dumb, you keep doubling down. It is true, the people who are as dumb as a bag of hammers truly don't realize just how f'ucking dumb they are.

So, I ask again. What is the word in that title that the possessive word is referring to? Bush's what?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
 
I realize if I try and reverse my position, I will look like a spineless twit.

I know that "super-PAC" is the object in the sentence, and I'm playing it off as if somehow that part doesn't count. "Jeb Bush's super-PAC," is the same thing as saying Jeb Bush's car, Jeb Bush's house, etc. I also know that "Bushes" would only be used if it were an object possessed by the entire family, for instance, "the Bushes family residence," but I'm gonna keep acting like this so these guys will think there's some obscure grammar rule which would somehow make my argument valid.

Well, at least you are finally admitting to your current stance.
 
Where’s Riflearm when you need him? Rifle, if you can break away from having brunch with porn stars and traveling the world with lesser-known whores with STD’s, could you end this grammar debate for us?

Thanks!
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT