Democrats aren’t done....

[30CAT]

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., a former member of the Jan. 6 select committee, said he is already crafting federal legislation that would force Trump of the ballot.

So desperate. Again, Democrats and no one else, are the threats to Democracy.

 

[herdfan06]

*off

 

[WVUSerg]

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., a former member of the Jan. 6 select committee, said he is already crafting federal legislation that would force Trump of the ballot.

So desperate. Again, Democrats and no one else, are the threats to Democracy.

The communist state of Maryland

 

[extragreen]

^^^ conidiots are NOW questioning their Supreme Court ruling that says Congress has to take up Section 3. Perhaps they don't know Raskin is a member of Congress. This is what you get.

 

[Marshall Jeff]

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., a former member of the Jan. 6 select committee, said he is already crafting federal legislation that would force Trump of the ballot.

So desperate. Again, Democrats and no one else, are the threats to Democracy.

Insurrection

 

[GeauxHerd]

^^^ conidiots are NOW questioning their Supreme Court ruling that says Congress has to take up Section 3. Perhaps they don't know Raskin is a member of Congress. This is what you get.

Republicans are also considering a bill starting no insurrection occurred. Raskins measure will get quashed in committee

 

[extragreen]

Republicans are also considering a bill starting no insurrection occurred. Raskins measure will get quashed in committee

These type of action is exactly what you're rethuglican supreme court justices mandated.

 

[mlblack16.]

Republicans should introduce legislation to make insurrection a legal and constitutional act.

The desperation in the Democrats is palpable and delicious. If you listen closely, you can even hear them whimpering as they speak. Greed has it too, but it's somewhat disguised by his cleft palate.

 

[30CAT]

^^^ conidiots are NOW questioning their Supreme Court ruling that says Congress has to take up Section 3. Perhaps they don't know Raskin is a member of Congress. This is what you get.

9-0, bitch.

 

[30CAT]

These type of action is exactly what you're rethuglican supreme court justices mandated.

^^^Dismisses the 3 Trump-hating liberals who agreed.^^^

 

[Marshall Jeff]

9-0, bitch.

Yeah bitch, 9-0

 

[mlblack16.]

Hey @extragreen I recommend you get with Perkins. He can spin that 0-9 record for your team and have you pumping sunshine out of it in no time.

 

[GeauxHerd]

Hey @extragreen I recommend you get with Perkins. He can spin that 0-9 record for your team and have you pumping sunshine out of it in no time.

Perkins runs the ministry of propaganda for Marshall but I don’t think he cares for Mush too much. So Atleast he has that going for him.

 

[ohio herd]

9-0
😎🤣🤪

 

[extragreen]

9-0, bitch.

You're wrong if you think I believe your trumptard appointed judges can manage to do the right thing.

 

[extragreen]

^^^Dismisses the 3 Trump-hating liberals who agreed.^^^

The lib supreme court justices are almost as bad. But the gom that's almost surely to happen in Congress is fully on your trumptard justices.

You're a lying idiot.

 

[extragreen]

Yeah bitch, 9-0

^^^racist

 

[30CAT]

The lib supreme court justices are almost as bad. But the gom that's almost surely to happen in Congress is fully on your trumptard justices.

You're a lying idiot.

So now you're against the radical left judges, because they sided with the Constitution? What's wrong, Miss "I don't know what a woman is" and her fellow left-wing lunatics, didn't side with an agenda and instead, sided with The People? Aw....Poor wittle extradumbass didn't get his way? What's the world coming to?

Keep crying, radical, left-wing, bleating, dumbass. 9-0, bitch.

 

[30CAT]

^^^racist

Supports a racist^^^

 

[mlblack16.]

Hey @extragreen

 

[WVUSerg]

45+9-0=47

 

[Marshall Jeff]

So now you're against the radical left judges, because they sided with the Constitution? What's wrong, Miss "I don't know what a woman is" and her fellow left-wing lunatics, didn't side with an agenda and instead, sided with The People? Aw....Poor wittle extradumbass didn't get his way? What's the world coming to?

Keep crying, radical, left-wing, bleating, dumbass. 9-0, bitch.

The libs have always been quick to dismiss those who don't fall in line.

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

^^^ conidiots are NOW questioning their Supreme Court ruling that says Congress has to take up Section 3. Perhaps they don't know Raskin is a member of Congress. This is what you get.

Yeah, I'm not sure why they would be outraged.

So now you're against the radical left judges, because they sided with the Constitution?

Let's be real: the Constitution was not followed here; SCOTUS simply found a way to make up some shit to kick the can down the road. Which SCOTUS has been doing since about the 1970s, nothing new here.

 

[extragreen]

So now you're against the radical left judges, because they sided with the Constitution? What's wrong, Miss "I don't know what a woman is" and her fellow left-wing lunatics, didn't side with an agenda and instead, sided with The People? Aw....Poor wittle extradumbass didn't get his way? What's the world coming to?

Keep crying, radical, left-wing, bleating, dumbass. 9-0, bitch.

The lib supreme court justices are almost as bad. But the gom that's almost surely to happen in Congress is fully on your trumptard justices.

You're a lying idiot.

 

[extragreen]

Supports a racist^^^

You're a lying idiot.

 

[extragreen]

The libs have always been quick to dismiss those who don't fall in line.

^^^racist

 

[30CAT]

Yeah, I'm not sure why they would be outraged.

Let's be real: the Constitution was not followed here; SCOTUS simply found a way to make up some shit to kick the can down the road. Which SCOTUS has been doing since about the 1970s, nothing new here.

Yeah...Let's. The Trump-hating liberals would have voted against Trump...But they didn't. They would have looked more stupid than they are (can't define a woman) for not following the Constitution. Aside from a few bleaters and Trump-haters, the majority predicted what would happen, based on the constitutionality......Guess what? They were correct. It didn't take a genius to know what Colorado and of other states did was 100% wrong. Of course bleaters and haters like yourself were wishing upon a star and eventually believed your pipe dream. The pipe dream some idiot media personalities, government bureaucrats and crooked judges were feeding you. You guys have no tastes bud. That or you like the taste of shit.

We all get it. You hate Trump. You've given us no good reason why, but we get it. After hoaxes, lies, extreme bias and redefining the Constitution. You don't have to tell us. It's out there. Again, we get it.

That said, with those hoaxes, lies, extreme bias...etc and to totally ignore what the left is doing? Open borders, illegal foreign nationals invite, America last, defund police, transgender push, catering to our enemies, globalism agenda, mutilating children...etc

You're the definition of blind and loyal sheep. You all don't even care about our freedom, for crying out loud. You're very willing to hand it all over to socialism.

It simply amazes me what you all are willing to hand over after everything our forefathers fought to get away from. The millions who gave the ultimate sacrifice to make sure we got it. And not you want to hand it all back?

F***ing nuts.

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

the majority predicted what would happen, based on the constitutionality......Guess what? They were correct.

No. The majority, like me, predicted they would find a reason to rule this way.

Of course bleaters and haters like yourself were wishing upon a star and eventually believed your pipe dream.

When did I say I was hoping SCOTUS would agree with Colorado? Was it in these posts?

And honestly, I think they should bullshit it. This court is already roundly seen to be full of shit, might as well overturn this and keep the peace, they have zero credibility to lose.

I told you all the Court would bullshit its way out of this, and why they would.

I have been consistent in saying the Court would bullshit their way out of this and that they SHOULD bullshit their way out of it. Which they did by kicking it down the road to Congress. The peace was kept, good job! You? You have been consistent in having no memory and/or being stupid.

 

[30CAT]

I have been consistent in saying the Court would bullshit their way out of this and that they SHOULD bullshit their way out of it. Which they did by kicking it down the road to Congress. The peace was kept, good job! You? You have been consistent in having no memory and/or being stupid.

They didn't bullshit their way. The Constitution and common sense was clear.

What's bullshit, was trying and still trying to remove Trump from the ballot.

Could you imagine the precedent Democrats would have set, had they gotten away with this?

Thank God for the Constitution and common sense.

The left will do anything for power and control. Republicans will almost do anything.

The People need to do everything they can to prevent that from happening.

 

[extragreen]

 

[Rock98Dog]

That a good picture of 47.

 

[extragreen]

That a good picture of 47.

Then here's another...

 

[19MU88]

^^^ conidiots are NOW questioning their Supreme Court ruling that says Congress has to take up Section 3. Perhaps they don't know Raskin is a member of Congress. This is what you get.

^^draft dodging fascist^^

 

[extragreen]

Thought I'd stop by for some trump chum

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

They didn't bullshit their way. The Constitution and common sense was clear.

Please write a detailed paragraph on how in your opinion the 14th Amendment is clear that only Congress can initiate enforcement of any clause of the 14th, but in particular the Insurrection Clause.

Or just admit they bullshitted it. Which is what is clear.

Common sense has very little to do with law. Common sense is that plenty of people have no desire to abide by the rules we agreed upon, so the Court had to bullshit to keep the peace. And I'm cool with that.

 

[WV-FAN]

Please write a detailed paragraph on how in your opinion the 14th Amendment is clear that only Congress can initiate enforcement of any clause of the 14th, but in particular the Insurrection Clause.

Or just admit they bullshitted it. Which is what is clear.

Common sense has very little to do with law. Common sense is that plenty of people have no desire to abide by the rules we agreed upon, so the Court had to bullshit to keep the peace. And I'm cool with that.

how about you write a detailed paragraph outlining a state's authority to initiate enforcement of any clause of the 14th, but in particular the insurrection Clause.

furthermore, back it up with a state's authority to enforce any federal law.

this would be like the local mcdonald's owner showing up to a board of director's meeting at mcd's corporate and demanding to run the show.

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

how about you write a detailed paragraph outlining a state's authority to initiate enforcement of any clause of the 14th

It's right there in the Enforcement Clause of the 14th.

If you go back to those times, which is supposedly the intent of Originalism, the Court in 1873 and 1883 was clear that the Enforcement Clause meant that if states chose to ignore the rest of the 14th, Congress would then step in to enforce it through "corrective legislation" (1883).

Colorado chose to not ignore it. There's no need for Congress to pass "corrective legislation".

Oddly, today's SCOTUS held that states can in fact keep an insurrectionist out of state office. But the framers of the 14th were clear they didn't want these folks in DC.

So much for Originalism. Or states' rights.

On a related note of states' rights, how far back does your WV ancestory go? If to the Civil War, which side did your ancestors pick? Them rich bastards across the mountains, or sticking with the Union and forming a new state?

 

[raleighherdfan]

I wasn't aware Trump had even been charged with insurrection. Originalism means a state can take a candidate off the ballot without even being charged for insurrection? Interesting take.

 

[30CAT]

I wasn't aware Trump had even been charged with insurrection. Originalism means a state can take a candidate off the ballot without even being charged for insurrection? Interesting take.

In other words, remove him for nothing.

He wasn't charged, let alone convicted, but bleaters think bureaucrats should be allowed to remove their OPPONENT from the ballot, based on opinion and not conviction.

If the table was turned, I would have the same opinion and bleaters would agree with me.

Guilty until proven innocent...That's today's left.

Innocent until proven guilty....That's the Constitution.

Again....Policy is what we all should be voting for, not party.

 

[WV-FAN]

It's right there in the Enforcement Clause of the 14th.

If you go back to those times, which is supposedly the intent of Originalism, the Court in 1873 and 1883 was clear that the Enforcement Clause meant that if states chose to ignore the rest of the 14th, Congress would then step in to enforce it through "corrective legislation" (1883).

Colorado chose to not ignore it. There's no need for Congress to pass "corrective legislation".

Oddly, today's SCOTUS held that states can in fact keep an insurrectionist out of state office. But the framers of the 14th were clear they didn't want these folks in DC.

So much for Originalism. Or states' rights.

On a related note of states' rights, how far back does your WV ancestory go? If to the Civil War, which side did your ancestors pick? Them rich bastards across the mountains, or sticking with the Union and forming a new state?

speaking of bullshit . . . not even a nice try. didn't expect to get called out for your own bullshit, did you?

you really have stepped across the bounds of mentally deranged liberalism. search your soul, my man, you will see your younger you being extremely disappointed.