Sam & I have differing opinions on a possible CUSA basketball victory by our men. Would love to get your take!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
........429 - I know you love living in a 50 shades of gray worl’, but this is purely a black or white issue. Either you accomplish your goal or you don’t. You can’t “almost” accomplish something! That is why there are only two choices.It’s an accomplishment but that doesn’t mean this season can’t be a disappointment at the same time
You think part of our goal was being middle of the pack with ~.500 conference record?........429 - I know you love living in a 50 shades of gray worl’, but this is purely a black or white issue. Either you accomplish your goal or you don’t. You can’t “almost” accomplish something! That is why there are only two choices.
You think part of our goal was being middle of the pack with ~.500 conference record?
........429 - I know you love living in a 50 shades of gray worl’, but this is purely a black or white issue. Either you accomplish your goal or you don’t. You can’t “almost” accomplish something! That is why there are only two choices.
Winning 6 games a year finishing 12 in conf but some how winning 4 more does not equate to a successful season. I’m sorry my expectations following last year were higher for this year. But I’m glad you are so simple minded that everything is black and white. For those of us living in the real world things aren’t that simple....Its not often I get the feeling of shooting fish in a barrel!! I believe our goal at the beginning of the season was to qualify for the NCAA tourney. A secondary goal (probably) was to get to the sweet 16. Accomplishing the 1st goal would imo count as a very successful season! I will admit I got sucked into thinking we might get in as an at-large before the season began, but irrespective(!) our only realistic shot each & every year is to get the auto bid that goes to the CUSA tournament winner.
........poll shaping up nicely at nearly 90% in the affirmative...
Winning 6 games a year finishing 12 in conf but some how winning 4 more does not equate to a successful season. I’m sorry my expectations following last year were higher for this year. But I’m glad you are so simple minded that everything is black and white. For those of us living in the real world things aren’t that simple
......Perhaps if I expand your understanding of the timeline for men’s basketball, it will at least provide some context for where I am coming from:
This is the 100th season for Marshall men’s basketball. Since the 1919-20 season, the times the Herd achieved significant success have been very rare. It took 27 seasons until a major success occurred. The ‘46-‘47 team won the schools 1st national title of any kind, the NAIB college tourney in Cali. Marshall qualified for the same tournament the next year and fell before reaching the championship game. In a mere 9 seasons, we received our 1st invite to TBD by winning the 1956 MAC. In 10 more seasons, the Dan D’Antoni-led Herd was chosen for the NIT, when it was a big deal. The boys took NYC by storm, gaining a bunch of new fans in making the semis. The next season saw a second NIT bid in a row. Only 4 seasons later, Mike D’Antoni’s cursive Herd received an at-large bid to TBD when only 32 teams got in. That was followed in ‘72-‘73 by a NIT invite. 10 more seasons after that Huck’s Herd won the SoCon Tourney 3 times in 4 seasons (one of those later vacated). Then in ‘87-‘88 Marshall was invited to a NIT that was a shadow of its former self. With me so far?
So, the 1st 70 seasons for MU resulted in officially 10 chances to advance in post-season play. Only in the 1st two did we win at least one game. Starting in ‘56 (NCAA appearances only), we were 0-5 until ‘17-‘18. So for 30 seasons (longest gap in history), we came as close as a UTC put back with 0.01 seconds left in 1997 to getting back to the only tournament that matters.
As Sam loves to describe it, we had 8 days where we were the better team in 4 consecutive games, including our 1st ever NCAA win! 100 seasons, success rate at/under 15% for post-season success. 85 % of the seasons we absolutely failed. So, if we were to win in Frisco and get into TBD 2 years in a row? Hell, yes I would say it was a successful season!!
WS
I will be dancing in the streets (nude)
......Perhaps if I expand your understanding of the timeline for men’s basketball, it will at least provide some context for where I am coming from:
This is the 100th season for Marshall men’s basketball. Since the 1919-20 season, the times the Herd achieved significant success have been very rare. It took 27 seasons until a major success occurred. The ‘46-‘47 team won the schools 1st national title of any kind, the NAIB small college tourney in Cali. Marshall qualified for the same tournament the next year and fell before reaching the championship game. In a mere 9 seasons, we received our 1st invite to TBD by winning the 1956 MAC. In 10 more seasons, the Dan D’Antoni-led Herd was chosen for the NIT, when it was a big deal. The boys took NYC by storm, gaining a bunch of new fans in making the semis. The next season saw a second NIT bid in a row. Only 4 seasons later, Mike D’Antoni’s cursive Herd received an at-large bid to TBD when only 32 teams got in. That was followed in ‘72-‘73 by a NIT invite. 10 more seasons after that Huck’s Herd won the SoCon Tourney 3 times in 4 seasons (one of those later vacated). Then in ‘87-‘88 Marshall was invited to a NIT that was a shadow of its former self. With me so far?
So, the 1st 70 seasons for MU resulted in officially 10 chances to advance in post-season play. Only in the 1st two did we win at least one game. Starting in ‘56 (NCAA appearances only), we were 0-5 until ‘17-‘18. So for 30 seasons (longest gap in history), we came as close as a UTC put back with 0.01 seconds left in 1997 to getting back to the only tournament that matters.
As Sam loves to describe it, we had 8 days where we were the better team in 4 consecutive games, including our 1st ever NCAA win! 100 seasons, success rate at/under 15% for post-season success. 85 % of the seasons we absolutely failed. So, if we were to win in Frisco and get into TBD 2 years in a row? Hell, yes I would say it was a successful season!!
WS
So because we’ve never had a history of success we shouldn’t have higher expectations for this team that won the conf tournament last year? “It doesn’t matter as long as we go dancing”. Let’s flip it around and talk football. Honestly short of about 15-20 years we haven’t been a very good program. Under your everything is black and white view of the world would going 6-6 and making a bowl game would constitute a successful season? Surely making and winning a bowl game is a goal of the football team......Perhaps if I expand your understanding of the timeline for men’s basketball, it will at least provide some context for where I am coming from:
This is the 100th season for Marshall men’s basketball. Since the 1919-20 season, the times the Herd achieved significant success have been very rare. It took 27 seasons until a major success occurred. The ‘46-‘47 team won the schools 1st national title of any kind, the NAIB small college tourney in Cali. Marshall qualified for the same tournament the next year and fell before reaching the championship game. In a mere 9 seasons, we received our 1st invite to TBD by winning the 1956 MAC. In 10 more seasons, the Dan D’Antoni-led Herd was chosen for the NIT, when it was a big deal. The boys took NYC by storm, gaining a bunch of new fans in making the semis. The next season saw a second NIT bid in a row. Only 4 seasons later, Mike D’Antoni’s cursive Herd received an at-large bid to TBD when only 32 teams got in. That was followed in ‘72-‘73 by a NIT invite. 10 more seasons after that Huck’s Herd won the SoCon Tourney 3 times in 4 seasons (one of those later vacated). Then in ‘87-‘88 Marshall was invited to a NIT that was a shadow of its former self. With me so far?
So, the 1st 70 seasons for MU resulted in officially 10 chances to advance in post-season play. Only in the 1st two did we win at least one game. Starting in ‘56 (NCAA appearances only), we were 0-5 until ‘17-‘18. So for 30 seasons (longest gap in history), we came as close as a UTC put back with 0.01 seconds left in 1997 to getting back to the only tournament that matters.
As Sam loves to describe it, we had 8 days where we were the better team in 4 consecutive games, including our 1st ever NCAA win! 100 seasons, success rate at/under 15% for post-season success. 85 % of the seasons we absolutely failed. So, if we were to win in Frisco and get into TBD 2 years in a row? Hell, yes I would say it was a successful season!!
WS
......if Herd Nation & the interweb existed back in the day:
Civil War
“If the Union Army is able to force Gen. Lee to surrender the Confederate Army and bring an end to the bloodiest conflict in American history, it would be quite an:”
A. accomplishment. 92%
B. disappointment 8%
B response: Well, overall I would support it, but we really sucked in the middle of the campaign. In Bull Run, Chickamauga and Chancellorsville, we didn’t show much effort! We should’ve never replaced Gen Meade. Grant really got lucky for those magical 15 months.
Bible miracle
“If Moses is able to part the Red Sea and free his people from the Egyptians while simultaneously destroying Pharoh’s army, it would be quite a:
A. accomplishment 97%
B. disappointment 3%
B response: While I would be OK with the result,
Moses took waaaay to long to get it done. Why would you let the people have to make bricks without straw? And what was he thinking going up to the mountain top? He should have known those rules would never hold up! We need to recruit bigger leaders.....