Pedonomics': $42B internet investment favors wealthy left-wing regions, new report finds

[30CAT]

Sure he's one of you @Raoul Duke MU and @extragreen?

'Bidenomics': $42B internet investment favors wealthy left-wing regions, new report finds

Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation report finds "Bidenomics" broadband internet investment meant for rural areas actually benefits affluent blue cities and states more.

www.foxnews.com

 

[HerdandHokies]

Sure he's one of you @Raoul Duke MU and @extragreen?

'Bidenomics': $42B internet investment favors wealthy left-wing regions, new report finds

Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation report finds "Bidenomics" broadband internet investment meant for rural areas actually benefits affluent blue cities and states more.

www.foxnews.com

He’s not wrong but it’s an inevitability of the per-state floor they put in.

The article is factually incorrect; Texas and California are not the most densely populated states. They’re 24 and 11 respectively, so no the most money didn’t go to the most densely populated states. People forget, especially with CA, just how much “nothing” there is, with large areas of very light population density and presumably poor broadband access. That’s even more true in Texas.

Divvying the money up by state instead of in a more intentional way is inefficient but was probably required to get the thing passed.

It does seem like satellites would've been cheaper but what do I know.

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

Texas is one of the two most densely populated states? At that statement, I wonder if Cruz actually lives in Texas lol.

What other lies are in there?

Edit..H&H beat me to it lol.

 

[Raoul Duke MU]

It does seem like satellites would've been cheaper but what do I know

I agree with the assertion that sat internet is not reliable.

If it is the only option you have, sure go ahead and get it.

But I wouldn't consider it the same kind of tool for economic development.