ADVERTISEMENT

Republican Christians

Y.A.G Si Ye Nots

Platinum Buffalo
Mar 7, 2010
5,841
2,426
113
Home Wrecker
There are quite a few of you on here. Which part of the last week bothered you the most:

1) cheeto's continued use of vulgarity in office
2) cheeto's exhibited racism
3) cheeto's new allegations of adultery, this time with both a porn star and a Playmate, each of whom were paid hush money

You can only pick one.
 
I didnt vote for trump. If anybody in goverment wants to cut a dime from americans I swear war against them. Even when people on foodstamps that abuse them their children still have to eat. Some school in our area has a 28,000 dollar bill from kids who cant pay their lunch bill. Surely some decent person could pay that. We must feed the kids for free.
 
There are quite a few of you on here. Which part of the last week bothered you the most:

1) cheeto's continued use of vulgarity in office
2) cheeto's exhibited racism
3) cheeto's new allegations of adultery, this time with both a porn star and a Playmate, each of whom were paid hush money

You can only pick one.

Better than Hillary. Plus, I am voting for a President not a spiritual leader.

I like Trump. Exactly what we needed. 4 Years is Awesome and beatting Hillary is all I ever wanted. Anything else is gravy.

I actually liked all three. Is there a like button? Why because it makes rifle's panties get wadded up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
There are quite a few of you on here. Which part of the last week bothered you the most:

1) cheeto's continued use of vulgarity in office
2) cheeto's exhibited racism
3) cheeto's new allegations of adultery, this time with both a porn star and a Playmate, each of whom were paid hush money

You can only pick one.

No Christian agrees with either of the three, assuming either are true (#2 isn't and #3 has been disputed).

But when trading these options with a woman who has had people murdered, ripped off countries like Haiti for millions for her own personal gain, has a very foul mouth herself, and is known to be an absolutely horrible person, I don't think there is a moral victor to choose from.

So...given the option...I would still choose Trump every single time and it's not even close. His politics closely align with mine, and Hillary is a liberal. Trump 2020!
 
No Christian agrees with either of the three, assuming either are true (#2 isn't and #3 has been disputed).

But when trading these options with a woman who has had people murdered, ripped off countries like Haiti for millions for her own personal gain, has a very foul mouth herself, and is known to be an absolutely horrible person, I don't think there is a moral victor to choose from.

So...given the option...I would still choose Trump every single time and it's not even close. His politics closely align with mine, and Hillary is a liberal. Trump 2020!

^^^a no information voter^^^
 
For most of my years i heard how could a democrat be a christian. Well thats just as stupid as saying any party cant be christians. I would be far better to God if I tried to help others. By sharing the word or any kind of kindness. Arguing on this board over politics is a total waste of time. Idle hands are the devils workshop.
 
Fever wont even mention where he goes to church. Usually people dont mention that if they are in a cult. Thought he was a JW
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19MU88
I didnt read thru the bible until i wss 33. Same age Jesus was when killed. The bible is God talking to us. No mistakes
 
Would you like to start by evaluating his seven-figure fine 30+ years ago for not renting to blacks, the accusation from the Justice Department that he was continuing that violation, or any of the other numerous incidents leading up to his most recent comments?

Your boy Jesse Jackson disagrees. And he’s the spokesman for all black people.
 
There are quite a few of you on here. Which part of the last week bothered you the most:

1) cheeto's continued use of vulgarity in office
2) cheeto's exhibited racism
3) cheeto's new allegations of adultery, this time with both a porn star and a Playmate, each of whom were paid hush money

You can only pick one.

Best I can tell, number 2 is a fabricated lib/media talking point.

Numbers 1 and 3 are personal failures that many/most have experienced and in no way negates his ability to lead or his personal faith.

The notion that Christians are infallible or shouldn't associate with people that have faults is (1) not Biblical, and (2) intellectually lazy and, frankly beneath your intelligence (or should be).
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio herd
Zero republicans are right.

You seem to need this.

5a5b7c568a17d.jpeg
 
A Christian would be foolish to vote strictly on faith...much like libs (and some of you homos) are foolish for voting democrat simply because you want to save an owl or where you prefer to stick your penis.

vote to MAGA, its that simple. economy, military, and strong boarders. it's not rocket science.
 
  • Like
Reactions: i am herdman
Best I can tell, number 2 is a fabricated lib/media talking point.

Numbers 1 and 3 are personal failures that many/most have experienced and in no way negates his ability to lead or his personal faith.

The notion that Christians are infallible or shouldn't associate with people that have faults is (1) not Biblical, and (2) intellectually lazy and, frankly beneath your intelligence (or should be).

No one, Christian or otherwise, should defend a president who is inexperienced, unfit, has no understanding of the Constitution, does not understand governing, and whose best attribute is lying and lying about lying.
 
I have no doubt you'll never see the validity of my positions. They're aligned with reality which Marxists like you either refuse to acknowledge or are unable to do so.

If your positions had validity, they'd have a point. They don't.
 
I left you a pretty picture about it earlier. Do I need to find a crayon drawing.

Ah, so you're still clinging to the alleged point you tried to make. You evidently are not aware, or refuse to acknowledge, that when the poor need assistance the most, it's at times when less is available from individuals. In addition to your implied charity from individuals being unworkable, it exposes your desire to pay less toward that assistance. So no, I'm absolutely not wrong. Which means you are.
 
when the poor need assistance the most, it's at times when less is available from individuals.

You guys never get to the root cause of this problem. High taxes, stifling regulations and the bureaucratic quagmire that accompanies all govt activity.

In addition to your implied charity from individuals being unworkable,

Your assertion doesn't make this true.

it exposes your desire to pay less toward that assistance.

I don't mind paying my fair share, in fact I do. I'd rather put more towards private solutions than bureaucratic ones that eat up money before it reaches its desired destination though.
 
Best I can tell, number 2 is a fabricated lib/media talking point.

Not reasonably sane,semi- intelligent person could look at the plethora of evidence against cheeto on this issue going back 40 years and think he isn't racist. That means you either aren't at least semi-intelligent or you have refused to actually look at all of the issues at play.


Numbers 1 and 3 are personal failures that many/most have experienced and in no way negates his ability to lead or his personal faith.

The notion that Christians are infallible or shouldn't associate with people that have faults is (1) not Biblical, and (2) intellectually lazy and, frankly beneath your intelligence (or should be).

This is great. You now want to bring intelligence into your argument. Tell me this, why not hypothetically vote in Hitler, Mussolini, or any other historical figure if Christians shouldn't avoid associating with or supporting people who have major ethical issues? You conveniently brush-off all of the anti-Christian stances cheeto's takes as simply nobody is "infalliable" and everyone has faults. So where is your line-in-the-sand to stop supporting people like this?
 
Brushy Bill is under yagsi's skin. I think he is winning also.

I am severely disappointed in him. Earlier, another poster said he was a legend on the wvu board. He has been awful here. He claims something is a lie, then when challenged with a laundry list of evidence supporting the claim he said was a lie, he runs away from it.

He has done the exact same in many other threads. I thought he would be entertaining, intelligent, present decent rebuttals, or a mixture of those. He hasn't done any of those yet.

I am hoping it is just cold feet being new around this town.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT