I see what you are saying but I do not agree that we should suck anything up to satisfy them. It is a shame that we can't come to terms and yeah most states had to intervene to make those instate schools play, UVA and VT is a good example, even getting VT into the ACC is another. As long as politics in WV stay out of MU and WVU matters, we will never play, its really that simple. That is fine with me, I just do not believe that WVU deserves a lopsided series, why would we agree to it when we can get similar programs to do a home and home and also give us sell outs at home? I mean think about it, it goes beyond what you get paid when you play away or what you pay them when they visit. More tickets sold, trumps that. I will bet that BG didn't draw nearly as many fans as MU did when visiting Morganhole, and they in turn forked out a good amount to get them to visit, so they lost money in every facet vs. playing us. It makes financial sense for us to play, but it doesn't make sense for MU to agree to play 75% of the games at WVU, that doesn't help our program. We aren't even talking about concession sales yet. We may make less money at home vs. Purdue due to paying them to visit, but in turn we gain it back when we visit them, so that part of thought is a wash. It goes right back to reasoning. So all you gain from playing WVU, if you beat them, is bragging rights and probably them never playing again not matter what. There isn't anything financially gained playing WVU over UL, and visits from Pitt, NC State coming, and dare I say Navy will draw well, even Boise St.. Does the state itself lose a little money, we all know it does, but as long as the political structure in the state is ok with that, then so be it.