Can you two theological geniuses please refrain from biblical de area in every damn thread
No. You might learn something, however distant the likelihood on your part.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can you two theological geniuses please refrain from biblical de area in every damn thread
A false prophet at this time is someone who teaches doctrine contrary to the New Testament, which is exactly what you do. You are attempting to obey the Old Law, which has been ended. You CANNOT be justified by the old law. Cannot.
You are STILL Lost that the Old Testament meant Animal Sacrifices
Who has told you that Sunday is the day of worship appointed by God?
There is no female image of God. And you have no scripture that says there is.
I'm telling you flat out that I am a member of Zion, as it is God's church.
I know what the Old Testament was. It no longer has dominion over ANYONE.
I dont keep Sunday service because that is man made teaching by the Catholic Church and the Roman Emperor Constantine
There is plenty of verses that show the female image of God. I mean we can start with Gen. 1 26-27 and end with Rev. 22:17
How are you Zion if you dont keep the festivals of God? Do you have a throne for God to sit on? I know better to call myself Zion and I keep the festivals.
I know better to call myself Zion and I keep the festivals.
The Old Testament is a Copy and a Shadow of what is to come and it contains God the Father will as explained in Matthew 7 21-24.
But the Old Testament IS NOT THE OLD LAW. It is why it is still in the Bible. Cant learn about the secrets of Heaven with only half of the information.
You have zero scripture in the New Testament that shows any particular day God should be worshiped.
In Genesis, men and women were created in the image of God, not by their physical traits, but that they were made spiritual beings with a soul.
In Rev., the woman signifies God's church.
The festivals of God were ordained under the old law, you get that? Under the old law. None of them are commanded under the New Testament except the passover consisting of washing of feet and communion.
No, I don't have a throne, I have a tabernacle, and it's me.
No, you simply do not understand what you read, and your keeping of festivals prove it.
It tells you in the 24th verse what the will of the Father is: 24 Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them
No one said the Old Testament is helpful in understanding the New Testament. But it's dominion over people was ended by Christ. It WAS the school master to bring the people to Christ. WAS.
But Paul and the disciples preached on the Sabbath after the death of Christ.
God said lets make man in OUR image. Clearly shows 2 people speaking
Church of God was established long before Revelations was written. If the Spirit is going to reveal the Bride in the last days then obviously its not the Church.
Feast of Unleavened Bread isnt the day after the Passover?
You dont have a Throne, Tabernacle or anything because WE ARENT ZION.
Clearly you need to stop following Man's teachings.
They preached daily.
No, 2 people were not speaking. The 2 "people" were God and Christ.
It's been the last days since Jesus came to earth.
Irrelevant. What did Jesus tell the apostles to do? After drinking of the cup, and breaking bread, and washing their feet, he said John 13:14 If I then, your Lord and Master, have washed your feet; ye also ought to wash one another's feet.
And Luke 22:19 And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me.
Those^^ are the things Jesus commanded. He did not command those things included in the old ritual.
I said I didn't have a throne. I am part of God's tabernacle. I am part of Zion.
Clearly, you are a false prophet.
1. You just contradicted yourself like always
2. No one said that? lol
Clearly you dont know what the hell you are talking about. For the sake of this board this is the last religious conversation I am having with you.
Its been the last days since Christ Died LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
between fever and greed, whoever posts next in this thread has to blow the other.
Mods can we please clean this back and forth up? It ruins EVER thread with even the hint of religious undertones
Mods can we please clean this back and forth up? It ruins EVER thread with even the hint of religious undertones
Fever, which Scripture shows God endorses abortion?
Did you not imply that God is cool with it because he provided the tools necessary to carry one out, ie medical knowledge?Where did I ever say God endorses Abortion?
Did you not imply that God is cool with it because he provided the tools necessary to carry one out, ie medical knowledge?
That doesn't mean it was not justified.Stephon Clark, the unarmed black man who was killed by the Sacramento police in his grandmother’s backyard, was shot eight times from behind or the side, according to a private autopsy commissioned by his family.
According to Dr. Omalu, Mr. Clark was shot four times in the lower part of his back, twice in his neck, and once under an armpit. He was also shot in the leg. One of the neck wounds was from the side, the doctor found.
WHY DOESNT TRUMP GET OFF THE FBI AND PAY ATTENTION TO THIS? WE ALL KNOW WHY.
HE'S A GUILTY AS SIN TRAITOR IN ONE SITUATION, AND THE KLAN WILL DISSAVOW HIM IN THE OTHER.
If you are threat to public safety law enforcement can neautalize a threat. Different situation than conceal carry holders.Of course it was justified. Clark is well known for charging police officers backwards.
Tablet dickhead
If you are threat to public safety law enforcement can neautalize a threat. Different situation than conceal carry holders.
Exactly that guy was no threat. He should be in jailA cop in SC in prison for the same thing
Exactly that guy was no threat. He should be in jail
I never said that . But video evidence that I have seen seems to justify the offficers we don't know the entire story yetStephon Clark was armed with a cell phone and was shot multiple times in the side and the back, and he was a threat? You are oozing ignorance right now.
I never said that . But video evidence that I have seen seems to justify the offficers we don't know the entire story yet
If you are threat to public safety law enforcement can neautalize a threat. Different situation than conceal carry holders.
I never said that . But video evidence that I have seen seems to justify the offficers we don't know the entire story yet
THE CALL WAS FOR VANDALISM. NOT SOME MAD DOG KILLER ON THE LOOSE.
CMON HERDMAN - YOU KNOW BETTER.
THE CALL WAS FOR VANDALISM. NOT SOME MAD DOG KILLER ON THE LOOSE.
CMON HERDMAN - YOU KNOW BETTER.