Like I said, it's sad because you really try so hard and all you've got is what mommy taught you about grammar.
You need a comma after "hard."
You're not smart enough to realize that nobody but you cares, nobody but you is hung up on it.
You need either a period or a semi-colon after "cares." But let's look at the substance of your attempt. Your "nobody cares" excuse is both pathetic and disheartening. You're fine with sounding like a poorly educated, inferior intelligence guy simply because you think "nobody cares"? Have some self pride. Have some desire to knowledge. You can get away with sounding like a moron in a poorly educated region like West Virginia/southern Ohio, but to the rest of the world, you expose yourself for being the poorly educated, sub-intellect that you are.
Again, you have failed in all four of your attempts to post a short paragraph that is grammatically correct. How pathetic is that? Some guy mocking the intelligence of a guy who is far brighter than him can't even write a grammatically correct paragraph in four attempts. West Virginia public schools are great!
all you've got is what mommy taught you about grammar.
This is as comical and inaccurate as the many attempts of people claiming on here that I "got [your] money from inheriting it from daddy." I run circles around my mom in grammar and spelling knowledge. Hell, she asks me for help on it. And, unfortunately for you, I am far more advanced in my math intelligence than English (which on its own, is really fvcking impressive).
In 1st and 2nd grade, I was completing sixth grade math workbooks. That gave me a foundation in math that led to being one of just two students who took Calculus II during high school. Since it was basically unheard of at that point for high school students to take Calculus II, we both had to go to Cornell multiple times per week for the course. The classmate who took it with me? He received both his Bachelor's and Master's in applied mathematics from Harvard within four years of graduating high school. He is now a professor of economics at MIT. Last year, The American Economist Association named him as the top economist under 40 years old in the U.S. Years ago, he was the fellow under the 2014 Nobel Prize winner in economics. He's been named to different White House committees over the years.
In other words, my rare territory was shared by some pretty good company. And due to my advanced start in math, I was beating him in all math situations from as early as the "around the world" elementary classroom math contests to special high school studies we were assigned since BC Calc/AP Calc/Calc I were not challenging enough for us.
an overpriced stuffed animal to needy children.
It was a chair, not a stuffed animal. The back of the neck of the giraffe was designed with wood as was the top of the back. It was a functioning chair disguised as a giraffe stuffed animal to interest children.
And I can't consider it "overpriced," because I am unable to put a price on the happiness of children.
Face it, your main contribution to society up to this point i
That's not even my main contribution to that home. I'd say my time spent with the children is #1, but in front of the holiday gifts was the donation allowing them to knock down walls, put up drywall, decorate, etc. different rooms so that 16 year old boys weren't sleeping next to four year old boys.
that has more depth than a died up creek? .
The girl last night had plenty of depth. I wasn't able to hit her cervix even when I went all of the way in. She's Chris D'Elia's (don't worry, I hadn't heard of him either, but I guess he is a big deal) girlfriend. So my accomplishment last night had more depth than a "died up creek." I'm guessing you intended to use the phrase "dried up creek," but then again, with your level of intelligence, nobody really has any clue what you're trying to say.
Now, instead of your numerous failed attempts to talk shit, how about staying on topic:
1) Explain the basic questions regarding GK's post. You harped on him repeatedly to explain what he meant. I told you what he meant, and it was obvious to anyone with even a bit of intelligence. You claimed I was wrong with my brief explanation even though GK confirmed I was correct. So if you're not taking GK's word for what he meant, what answer are you looking for, stupid? Explain yourself.
2) Explain your false reverse stock split claim.
3) Give us another one of those great jabs along the lines of "Go masturbate in a mirror (so you can be with the only person to ever truly love you)." God damn, that's embarrassing to even think about you typing.