Correct, that's a poor argument in terms of West Virginia. Wal mart is the largest employer in the majority of US states, and maybe the vast majority.Originally posted by herdit44:
Walmart is the largest private employer in the US, so.......Originally posted by Herdon2:
When Walmart is the states largest employer...that's not good.
Just curious, but what will these other locations provide for your kids to do that Huntington and the surrounding area doesn't?Originally posted by H8WVU:
The "future light" for WV is fading fast. This is my State, born and raised. I earned by degree from Marshall and went to law school out of State (sorry WVU) and moved back with my WV born and raised wife. I have practiced law here for the last 14 years. I have two kids that are currently in middle school. I make a really good salary. My wife works as well and makes a decent salary. (Also a graduate of Marshall) However, my wife and I have decided that in about a year or so, we are moving.
We are not moving because of ourselves, we are moving for our kids. There is nothing here for our kids and I don't see it changing. It hasn't since I was a kid. Healthcare is not great, nothing here for kids to do, majority of people are unhealthy, jobs are pretty much non-existent. WV routinely rates dead last in these categories. Highest percent of households earning less than $25,000 a year we are next to last (which is not good). I think the last time I looked the poverty rate was something like 19%. Something like only 30% of people 25 to 34 had an associate degree or higher.
Gallup did a chart a year or so a go. It was a future livability chart for each State. West Virginia ranked "worst" State in the following: Economic confidence index, obesity, smoker, future job prospects, well being, social life.
So, it is not just the money or job prospects for us. We will be fine either way. However, we want more opportunity for our kids. That is our focus.
He is saying there are not many promising industries for good jobs in WV and another state will provide more opportunities for his kids. There will always be some good jobs in any area but there needs to be enough to where people are not underemployed. Which I figure is his concern. His kids may turn out to be smart well educated adults but there could be others who have already taken the majority of the good jobs and they may have to settle for a lesser position than they could get in another area. Stronger economies provide more and better paying jobs.Originally posted by herdit44:
Just curious, but what will these other locations provide for your kids to do that Huntington and the surrounding area doesn't?Originally posted by H8WVU:
The "future light" for WV is fading fast. This is my State, born and raised. I earned by degree from Marshall and went to law school out of State (sorry WVU) and moved back with my WV born and raised wife. I have practiced law here for the last 14 years. I have two kids that are currently in middle school. I make a really good salary. My wife works as well and makes a decent salary. (Also a graduate of Marshall) However, my wife and I have decided that in about a year or so, we are moving.
We are not moving because of ourselves, we are moving for our kids. There is nothing here for our kids and I don't see it changing. It hasn't since I was a kid. Healthcare is not great, nothing here for kids to do, majority of people are unhealthy, jobs are pretty much non-existent. WV routinely rates dead last in these categories. Highest percent of households earning less than $25,000 a year we are next to last (which is not good). I think the last time I looked the poverty rate was something like 19%. Something like only 30% of people 25 to 34 had an associate degree or higher.
Gallup did a chart a year or so a go. It was a future livability chart for each State. West Virginia ranked "worst" State in the following: Economic confidence index, obesity, smoker, future job prospects, well being, social life.
So, it is not just the money or job prospects for us. We will be fine either way. However, we want more opportunity for our kids. That is our focus.
I believe he is referring to the Eastern Panhandle. Correct me if im wrong.Originally posted by elginherd:
What is the "EP" that the realsam refers to???
OK, that makes sense in the context of his posts. Thank you.Originally posted by jkcoltsfan18:
I believe he is referring to the Eastern Panhandle. Correct me if im wrong.Originally posted by elginherd:
What is the "EP" that the realsam refers to???
On several levels, that is VERY correct. Most coal is used to boil water & raise the temp & pressurize the resulting steam to rotate turbines. All the alternatives (fuel oil, natural gas, enriched uranium) to boil the water are much, much cleaner & don't require blasting the shit out of mountain ranges. All 3 alternatives have their disadvantages, but coal pretty much is the worst option.Originally posted by Gochneaur645:
Coal sucks.
So you went into debt for a depreciating, ultimately worthless piece of junk that cost roughly a weeks pay (assuming you worked a full 40hr workweek). No wonder you don't think someone can live on $15 hour starting out in the working world. If this post is any indication how you handled your finances its amazing you can afford the computer you are typing on.Originally posted by Always The Herd:
In the late summer of 1970 I left Marshall and went to work for a large coal company. I ordered and bought a new 1971 Chevrolet Nova in approx. February of 1971.........I wanted to buy and install an 8-track tape player (thery were the big thing when trying to listen to music in your car back then).
I went to one of the local stores in my town and wanted to start establising some other credit. If memory serves me right the Motorola player was approx. $49.00 (quite a bit of money back then, especially when the minimum wage was approx. $1.25 per hour). I asked the owner of the store if I could charge it and he said I could as long as I put it on my mother's charge account (you could charge at local stores back then too). I said nicely.....no, I want to open up an account and put it in my name. He ABSOLUTELY refused and said no I wasn't 21 yet (would have been in April of that year). I ended up getting mad and upset and said NO I will not put it in her name. I then stated that I would not buy anything else from that store again (I don't think I ever did, but not positive).
I told other adults and people my own age.....that was a BIG problem with business people in our town. They didn't want to trust people or give someone a chance to get started and didn't look to the future for improvement & change & vertually would become stagnant.........
now in 2015 the town is virtually dried up. All of these businesses went out of business: Krogers, A&P, 2 indoor theaters, bowling alley, 3 jewelery stores, 4 clothing stores, Western Auto, G. C. Murpy's, Ford, Chevrolet, Buick, Crysler, hardware store, Sears catalog store, 3 barber shops, 4 gas stations, oil distributor, wholesale grocery company, an hospital, numerous bars, hotel & many others.........
I dont know if you are angry at him or what but I dont see in his story that he purchased the 8 track. Also it is admirable is that he did not want to put his mom on the hook for his purchase. However, if a person can get a loan for a car they should probably be able to get credit for a 8-track player. I am not sure why you are so combative about the purchase of the 8-track. How is that any different from buying a nice TV nowadays? Lets say you make 40,000/year and you are paid on the 15 and 30th of each month. $40,000 / 24 = $1,666.67 per two weeks. $1,666.67/2 = 833.34 per week. A good TV is somewhere close to $800. $40,000 is a reasonable salary in todays terms. So you are saying someone is dumb for purchasing a TV for one weeks worth of their salary?Originally posted by raleighherdfan:
So you went into debt for a depreciating, ultimately worthless piece of junk that cost roughly a weeks pay (assuming you worked a full 40hr workweek). No wonder you don't think someone can live on $15 hour starting out in the working world. If this post is any indication how you handled your finances its amazing you can afford the computer you are typing on.Originally posted by Always The Herd:
In the late summer of 1970 I left Marshall and went to work for a large coal company. I ordered and bought a new 1971 Chevrolet Nova in approx. February of 1971.........I wanted to buy and install an 8-track tape player (thery were the big thing when trying to listen to music in your car back then).
I went to one of the local stores in my town and wanted to start establising some other credit. If memory serves me right the Motorola player was approx. $49.00 (quite a bit of money back then, especially when the minimum wage was approx. $1.25 per hour). I asked the owner of the store if I could charge it and he said I could as long as I put it on my mother's charge account (you could charge at local stores back then too). I said nicely.....no, I want to open up an account and put it in my name. He ABSOLUTELY refused and said no I wasn't 21 yet (would have been in April of that year). I ended up getting mad and upset and said NO I will not put it in her name. I then stated that I would not buy anything else from that store again (I don't think I ever did, but not positive).
I told other adults and people my own age.....that was a BIG problem with business people in our town. They didn't want to trust people or give someone a chance to get started and didn't look to the future for improvement & change & vertually would become stagnant.........
now in 2015 the town is virtually dried up. All of these businesses went out of business: Krogers, A&P, 2 indoor theaters, bowling alley, 3 jewelery stores, 4 clothing stores, Western Auto, G. C. Murpy's, Ford, Chevrolet, Buick, Crysler, hardware store, Sears catalog store, 3 barber shops, 4 gas stations, oil distributor, wholesale grocery company, an hospital, numerous bars, hotel & many others.........
Additionally, a business that doesn't extend credit to someone in this type of situation is a blessing. If more businesses (and govts) practiced this policy, this country wouldn't be bankrupt the way we are now.
No that's not what I am saying. You are changing the premise of what ATH was stating he was actually looking to do. ATH was not simply talking about buying with cash a depreciating item like a tape player. Buying with debt (no matter who's debt it is) is not the same (or wise) as buying with cash. If one has the expendable cash on hand to do so.......then so be it. Its their $$$, good for them.Originally posted by jkcoltsfan18:
I dont know if you are angry at him or what but I dont see in his story that he purchased the 8 track. Also it is admirable is that he did not want to put his mom on the hook for his purchase. However, if a person can get a loan for a car they should probably be able to get credit for a 8-track player. I am not sure why you are so combative about the purchase of the 8-track. How is that any different from buying a nice TV nowadays? Lets say you make 40,000/year and you are paid on the 15 and 30th of each month. $40,000 / 24 = $1,666.67 per two weeks. $1,666.67/2 = 833.34 per week. A good TV is somewhere close to $800. $40,000 is a reasonable salary in todays terms. So you are saying someone is dumb for purchasing a TV for one weeks worth of their salary?Originally posted by raleighherdfan:
So you went into debt for a depreciating, ultimately worthless piece of junk that cost roughly a weeks pay (assuming you worked a full 40hr workweek). No wonder you don't think someone can live on $15 hour starting out in the working world. If this post is any indication how you handled your finances its amazing you can afford the computer you are typing on.Originally posted by Always The Herd:
In the late summer of 1970 I left Marshall and went to work for a large coal company. I ordered and bought a new 1971 Chevrolet Nova in approx. February of 1971.........I wanted to buy and install an 8-track tape player (thery were the big thing when trying to listen to music in your car back then).
I went to one of the local stores in my town and wanted to start establising some other credit. If memory serves me right the Motorola player was approx. $49.00 (quite a bit of money back then, especially when the minimum wage was approx. $1.25 per hour). I asked the owner of the store if I could charge it and he said I could as long as I put it on my mother's charge account (you could charge at local stores back then too). I said nicely.....no, I want to open up an account and put it in my name. He ABSOLUTELY refused and said no I wasn't 21 yet (would have been in April of that year). I ended up getting mad and upset and said NO I will not put it in her name. I then stated that I would not buy anything else from that store again (I don't think I ever did, but not positive).
I told other adults and people my own age.....that was a BIG problem with business people in our town. They didn't want to trust people or give someone a chance to get started and didn't look to the future for improvement & change & vertually would become stagnant.........
now in 2015 the town is virtually dried up. All of these businesses went out of business: Krogers, A&P, 2 indoor theaters, bowling alley, 3 jewelery stores, 4 clothing stores, Western Auto, G. C. Murpy's, Ford, Chevrolet, Buick, Crysler, hardware store, Sears catalog store, 3 barber shops, 4 gas stations, oil distributor, wholesale grocery company, an hospital, numerous bars, hotel & many others.........
Additionally, a business that doesn't extend credit to someone in this type of situation is a blessing. If more businesses (and govts) practiced this policy, this country wouldn't be bankrupt the way we are now.
. . . and fuel oil, natural gas, enriched uranium, water turbines, wind turbines and sunlight collector grids all are far more expensive than bituminous coal per btu of output.The Obama regime has shut electrical generation units adding up 72 gigawatts of power generation - enough to supply 44.7 million homes. That is all the power needed for every state west of the Mississippi excluding Texas. The EPA is targeting a total of 103 GW of power. The only question is: When will the brown-outs begin - starting with the east coast?Originally posted by elginherd:
On several levels, that is VERY correct. Most coal is used to boil water & raise the temp & pressurize the resulting steam to rotate turbines. All the alternatives (fuel oil, natural gas, enriched uranium) to boil the water are much, much cleaner & don't require blasting the shit out of mountain ranges. All 3 alternatives have their disadvantages, but coal pretty much is the worst option.Originally posted by Gochneaur645:
Coal sucks.
co·lo·ni·al·ismOriginally posted by Raoul Duke MU:
Over 100 years of colonialism with extraction industries. WV is rugged, most locals still isolated. Face it, the state is fvcked and there is nothing any politician can do but cut off the bums so they move, clean the place up, and leave it for old hippies, rich people who want to live in the mountains, and a few low paying jobs in tourism. And ban MTR tomorrow, all it does is mess up the view for the above hippies, the rich, and tourists.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
It does suck. Where is all the ash 'deposited'? The ash is very high in heavy metal salts & forms dams which kill people. The exhaust of even the 'cleanest' coal burned contains heavy metal compounds. Transporting coal is dangerous. There is no valid reason that using uranium & plutonium would be more expensive except that the environmentalists went after the wrong target which would be COAL. Extracting coal permanently fvcks up the ecologies & topographies of where it's mined...and since huge volumes of coal relative to Uranium is required, extracting coal REALLY scars the country side...along with the huge amount of ash produced. (Any form of oil is no bargain either in terms of extraction, but at least there's not much solid waste after burning. U mining is nasty, but much less ore is needed to produce the same energy. E = MC^2 baby.)Originally posted by herdgadfly:
. . . and fuel oil, natural gas, enriched uranium, water turbines, wind turbines and sunlight collector grids all are far more expensive than bituminous coal per btu of output.The Obama regime has shut electrical generation units adding up 72 gigawatts of power generation - enough to supply 44.7 million homes. That is all the power needed for every state west of the Mississippi excluding Texas. The EPA is targeting a total of 103 GW of power. The only question is: When will the brown-outs begin - starting with the east coast?Originally posted by elginherd:
On several levels, that is VERY correct. Most coal is used to boil water & raise the temp & pressurize the resulting steam to rotate turbines. All the alternatives (fuel oil, natural gas, enriched uranium) to boil the water are much, much cleaner & don't require blasting the shit out of mountain ranges. All 3 alternatives have their disadvantages, but coal pretty much is the worst option.Originally posted by Gochneaur645:
Coal sucks.
Coal does not suck! Most U.S coal comes from three open quarry mines located in the Powder River Basin on the high plains of northeastern Wyoming. The North Antelope Rochelle mine in Powder River Basin, operated by Peabody Energy, is the world's largest. Black Thunder is fifth largest and the Coballo mine, near Gillette, WY is #8. This coal is high in btus and very low in sulfur. The operations are mechanized with huge machines doing the work. The coal is super, super, cheap. The coal deposits are vast. Why would we use any other fuel to produce electrical power?
Originally posted by herdgadfly:
elginherd:
You need to seriously reconsider your limited outlook. If we adopt the thinking of the communist environmentalists, there is no "living the good life" left for us. We can knuckle under to the political lies and regress to the dark cold hardscrabble times of the 18th century or we can enjoy the bright cool times that modern technology has brought.
If we buy into government lies such as 'second hand smoke" and "global warming" - then accepting the government claims about coal ash might be easier - but we already know they lie to us. God's world is bigger than all of us put together and we are but pissants wandering in the Sahara Desert. There is nothing that man can do to harm the good Earth. So let us start a new sanity by not paying excessive costs for the energy that makes living easier.
Yep, I laughed at that comment myself. WOW!Originally posted by jkcoltsfan18:
Originally posted by herdgadfly:
elginherd:
You need to seriously reconsider your limited outlook. If we adopt the thinking of the communist environmentalists, there is no "living the good life" left for us. We can knuckle under to the political lies and regress to the dark cold hardscrabble times of the 18th century or we can enjoy the bright cool times that modern technology has brought.
If we buy into government lies such as 'second hand smoke" and "global warming" - then accepting the government claims about coal ash might be easier - but we already know they lie to us. God's world is bigger than all of us put together and we are but pissants wandering in the Sahara Desert. There is nothing that man can do to harm the good Earth. So let us start a new sanity by not paying excessive costs for the energy that makes living easier.
Am I missing sarcasm or what is going on here?
This post was edited on 2/27 9:26 AM by jkcoltsfan18
There is no state similar to WV. Seriously. The closest would be Wyoming, and all they have is the same extraction industries (just a lot more stuff to extract) with the wealth fleeing the state. Wyoming has a high median income because no one lives there. One day, when all the mineral wealth is gone, Wyoming will either see everyone leave or it will be another WV.Originally posted by Herdstruck:
As I said, we need to look at a state similar to WV...well...one that WAS similar to WV and see how their model worked for them.
WY does have more exclusive resorts. The high median income is skewed because there are some very rich people who own large tracts of land there. So I largely concur; no other state approximates WV.Originally posted by Raoul Duke MU:
There is no state similar to WV. Seriously. The closest would be Wyoming, and all they have is the same extraction industries (just a lot more stuff to extract) with the wealth fleeing the state. Wyoming has a high median income because no one lives there. One day, when all the mineral wealth is gone, Wyoming will either see everyone leave or it will be another WV.Originally posted by Herdstruck:
As I said, we need to look at a state similar to WV...well...one that WAS similar to WV and see how their model worked for them.
Originally posted by H8WVU:
I have two kids that are currently in middle school.
We will be fine either way. However, we want more opportunity for our kids. That is our focus.
You forgot about WVU...nah you ARE correct, all they have is Marshall.Originally posted by Penn2moss:
You are wrong Clark.
If he moves to Nc, Va, or Mich, his kids can attend one of the top 3 public schools in America for college.
Here all they have is Marshall.