ADVERTISEMENT

Gaetz for AG.

Stocks are overpriced now but you are missing the point and banks now are not in bad shape like they were becoming in 2008 or nothing like 1929...Time and time again when banks are not regulated they cause a recession or like in 1929 when they were the main culprit in a depression. Trump will deregulate banks in a big way because he wants stocks to rise to great heights and just like in the 1920 s he will succeed. But they will be way way too high and when banks start to invest in derivatives and the market is bound to correct from these highs they wont be able to meet their obligations on them and people will make a run on the banks to get their money out. Thats how it played out in 1929 and it will happen again because of Trumps policies.
All you are capable of doing is talking in circles, ButTrumper.

You have no idea what “Trumps policies” are in relation to banks. The only thing you say is Butt Tump. If anything his policy stance on Crypto will be far more impactful on financial markets than anything I’ve heard specifically related to banks. Keep rambling.

All-Cause Mortality

This is incorrect, and all-cause mortality will prove it at the end of this year. Will be staggering. I'll be here to tell you I told you so.
It's going to be so confusing to the vax addicts when 2022 all-cause mortality outpaces even 2021, after the fake pandemic is over.
2022 all cause mortality will be the highest ever recorded in human history and we need something to blame it on.



Through 9 months we are on pace for the highest all-cause mortality in 30 years. And that’s after all the most vulnerable were taken the previous two years due to the fake pandemic.




@Archetype XLIV , @big_country90 , @ThunderCat98 , @AmeriKenny, you morons liked some of these claims. Would you like to look at all-cause morality numbers?

fyi Charles Huff..

I think that looking at defensive points allowed isn’t really different from stop rate. Both tell you who has the most effective defenses where it matters most.

They are both, not entirely but significantly, junk stats.

Let's say Team A has a really good offense. Their offense scores a lot or drives long enough to flip the field and give the opposing offense bad field position a lot of the time.

Team B has a putrid offense. They turn the ball over (putting their defense in short-field situations), don't put together drives/gain yards which means the opposing offense routinely gets great field position.

Team A's defense could start a drive at the opposing 10 yard line, allow a 70 yard drive, and only give up a field goal.
Team B's defense could start a drive at midfield, allow a 20 yard drive, and only give up a field goal.

Yet based on the stats you are championing (defensive points allowed and stop rate), both defenses would be tied even though one is far superior than the other.

At Footballoutsiders.com, we had a very good stat that looked at yards given up vs. remaining yards possibly gained at the start of a drive. I saw "we," because I discovered a logical error with one of their stats more than a decade ago. They partially agreed and spun that to a new stat, found out I was a coach, and frequently used me for consulting and testing. Unfortunately, after selling the site, the new owners went bankrupt, and it is gone. It was, by far, the best football site out there made by a bunch of Brown University alums.

Back to the example: In other words, Team A would allow 70 yards. Team B would allow 20 yards. Both would get stops and be given the same score using your stats, yet one defense was far better than the other.

Team A would have allowed 70 yards out of a possible 90 yards while Team B would have allowed 20 yards out of a possible 50 yards. Team B was far better.

End of half drives/junk drives would be excluded.

ICE arrests 3 illegal immigrants in Mass.: 2 charged with child rape, 1 convicted of same crime in Brazil

These are the freaks Democrats are trying to protect with sanctuary cities.

  • Like
Reactions: rvntx

Official communication from the desk of Michigan J. Herd

I don't know why Michigan is still fighting this after all of these years and showcasing himself as whiney little bitch. Listen, I an sick. I haven't been sick in years, and I have a really bad cold. So of all of the time, I suggest Michigan not being a whiney little bitch while I have a short fuse.

The reality is that I play by a different set of rules. Why? A mixture of all of these: I pack the stadium; the mods saw what I did while hacking HerdFans and are scared of me doing the same here; they find me entertaining; I share their political views; all of their intelligence combined, just like with the deplorables on here, still don't equal my intelligence.

The fact is that I am just a far superior poster to anything you will ever be, Michigan. I am the reason why the HN Hall-of-Fame was built. I am the legend of this board.

Seriously, what on earth is Michigan getting suspended for?
He said some really, really terrible things. He claimed that blacks were "savages." He claimed that women shouldn't have the right to vote. He claimed that he avoided hotels where blacks were and hated being on the same plane with blacks. He claimed Jews were purposely trying to destroy America. He made extremely homophobic comments. He claimed that no black civilization has ever prospered nor were there any societies that blacks could create on their own that would succeed.

Oh, wait. That wasn't MIchigan. That was your best friend, Nick Goff of Huntington, who said all of that and more.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT