And there it is finally proof that the most self centered in better than you poster in the history of herd nation has returned. Welcome back
Glad to be in your presence again, Sisters.
And there it is finally proof that the most self centered in better than you poster in the history of herd nation has returned. Welcome back
you think anyone on this board thinks that was spin? moron
I guess it comes down to who has the most clout for the left on this board, a failure welfare cabinet maker from wayne or a glorified ball boy.
How many D1 sports did you play? How many D1 sports did you start in for four years? How many D1 sports have you coached? How many of your position unit players have signed NFL/CFL contracts and/or been in the top 10 in the country at their position?
Why take jabs at somebody far more successful than you in just about everything?
It came from your own words: What is clear from this conversation is that the rest of the "free" world does "need" the United States. The fact that citizens (your friends) from around the world find the time and energy to be flabbergasted at Americans decisions at the ballot box shows our influence as leaders and their need to know American strength is still available to back them up if necessary.
Since Russia was one of a handful of countries listed, and since that has been the center of the conversation, it wasn't any stretch to believe you included Russia since you referenced my friends from around the world (which Russia was one of and the most discussed). Further, you have tried entering a strawman into the question. I never claimed you suggested we would back Russia over our real allies in most issues. Not only was that not a claim I made, but it couldn't even remotely be inferred from anything I typed.
I did take your comment, which was about my friends from around the world (again, with the Russian being the most discussed), and logically infer that you included Russia in it since it was the prime focus of my friends from around the world.
Canada, Australia, Finland, etc. don't come begging us for help. Your typical American, insulated view shows a lack of world knowledge. Look at any of the many best countries to live in rankings. Many of the rankings have those countries ahead of the U.S. Look at the education testing rankings from each country. The U.S. is solidly in the middle, well behind many of those countries.
My ACTUAL world knowledge understands that without US (economic success and stability), Canada and Australia wouldn't be enjoying much of the wealth they have today.
Without American military force and security of Europe, the Fins most likely would be as afraid of Russian aggression as some of the libs have become
You think Russia is interested because they know American strength will back them if necessary?
And there it is finally proof that the most self centered in better than you poster in the history of herd nation has returned. Welcome back
Whoops, I also broke the law while posting. Double whammyThis always happens when one poster tries to call other posters idiots.
LOLHow many D1 sports did you play? How many D1 sports did you start in for four years? How many D1 sports have you coached? How many of your position unit players have signed NFL/CFL contracts and/or been in the top 10 in the country at their position?
Why take jabs at somebody far more successful than you in just about everything?
Hey Mark...I thought you banned riflearm? What's he doing posting under a new screen name?
Pardon me for asking, but isn't Kelly a girl's name? Asking for a friend.Reminds me of this movie, when Eddie Murphy yells out, "hey boss, he ain't workin'!"
True, but they wouldn't have done that without USA. They were getting most of their food from us, most boots/clothes from us, 3/4 of their trucks were Studebakers/Willys, and the war machines they were creating was using American Steel.The Russians had already started to push back the Germans before we even joined the European Theatre.
so we're still missing Stoney... who else?
True, but they wouldn't have done that without USA. They were getting most of their food from us, most boots/clothes from us, 3/4 of their trucks were Studebakers/Willys, and the war machines they were creating was using American Steel.
The Lend-Lease program probably had more influence on the European Front than the soldiers we sent. During WWII the US had about 50% of the worlds production potential and we took full advantage of it.
Two high level Swedish pols come out today in support of Trump saying Sweden is trying to cover up the crime and problems being caused by refugees and immigrants. Duh to the naysayers.
There you go making stuff up again.Two high level Swedish pols come out today in support of Trump saying Sweden is trying to cover up the crime and problems being caused by refugees and immigrants. Duh to the naysayers.
Don't believe it if it's not Rasmussen
Don't believe it if it's not Rasmussen
"Crimes against life and health in Sweden have decreased in recent years."
__from your link
you are ignoring the social-economical problem. the fact remains that nearly 60% of Swedes are more concerned about the immigration policy than ANY other factor in their daily lives.
i'm sure they are all just uneducated redneck Swedes though.
And you are ignoring the fact that while all those heathen Muslims were immigrating into Sweden, the crimes did not increase. Additionally while you keep your focus on immigration, 30,000 Americans are killed per year by guns and another 10,000 by drunk drivers. But Cheetos will keep you "safe".
you have pretty much reduced it to showing him pictures....doubt Greed will still get it though.and the number of "sex crimes reported" mirrors the above graph
![]()
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_Sweden
To be fair to Muhammad & Friends, imagine being a refugee from a land of bearded women, and then landing in Sweden, home to some of the world's most gorgeous blondes. Not saying that has anything to do with it, but it might... I figure I would be tapping some of that stuff as well.and the number of "sex crimes reported" mirrors the above graph
it DID increase. "crime on life and health" dropped in 2013. it is still below the peak in 2011 but is trending back up. that is what has been cited everywhere. look at this line graph. even a cabinet maker should be able to see the steady increase from the 2000 to 2013. then notice it ticks right back up.
from the same link/article above:
![]()
You need to spend more time analyzing your graphs before you spout off. The very year in which immigration into sweden spiked is the year that crimes per population went DOWN. Furthermore, your rape data is not a result of immigrants raping, but according to YOUR linked article, results from......."The rate of exposure to sexual offences has remained relatively unchanged, according to the SCS, since the first survey was conducted in 2006, despite an increase in the number of reported sex crimes.[34] This discrepancy can largely be explained by reforms in sex crime legislation, widening of the definition of rape,[35][36][37] and an effort by the Government to decrease the number of unreported cases". Even cabinetmakers can fact check. You should try it.
that's not the sexual assault graph bigger moron.
Moronic moron, the additional rape cases due to changes in rape laws are included in crimes per population statistics.