ADVERTISEMENT

Swedish terror massacre

I guess it comes down to who has the most clout for the left on this board, a failure welfare cabinet maker from wayne or a glorified ball boy.

Since you scaredy cat cons only listen to someone who talks loud and blatantly lies, I have no desire to have clout with such a paltry group.
 
How many D1 sports did you play? How many D1 sports did you start in for four years? How many D1 sports have you coached? How many of your position unit players have signed NFL/CFL contracts and/or been in the top 10 in the country at their position?

Why take jabs at somebody far more successful than you in just about everything?

Oh my God, dtard got a brain transplant!
 
It came from your own words: What is clear from this conversation is that the rest of the "free" world does "need" the United States. The fact that citizens (your friends) from around the world find the time and energy to be flabbergasted at Americans decisions at the ballot box shows our influence as leaders and their need to know American strength is still available to back them up if necessary.

Since Russia was one of a handful of countries listed, and since that has been the center of the conversation, it wasn't any stretch to believe you included Russia since you referenced my friends from around the world (which Russia was one of and the most discussed). Further, you have tried entering a strawman into the question. I never claimed you suggested we would back Russia over our real allies in most issues. Not only was that not a claim I made, but it couldn't even remotely be inferred from anything I typed.

I did take your comment, which was about my friends from around the world (again, with the Russian being the most discussed), and logically infer that you included Russia in it since it was the prime focus of my friends from around the world.

Lets revisit how our conversation started with your first reply to me:

Canada, Australia, Finland, etc. don't come begging us for help. Your typical American, insulated view shows a lack of world knowledge. Look at any of the many best countries to live in rankings. Many of the rankings have those countries ahead of the U.S. Look at the education testing rankings from each country. The U.S. is solidly in the middle, well behind many of those countries.

My immediate reply:

My ACTUAL world knowledge understands that without US (economic success and stability), Canada and Australia wouldn't be enjoying much of the wealth they have today.

Without American military force and security of Europe, the Fins most likely would be as afraid of Russian aggression as some of the libs have become

(insert a few additional paragraphs related to France/American relations)

You think Russia is interested because they know American strength will back them if necessary?

Again, nothing in my comments suggested the US would back Russia over our other allies. In fact it was exactly the opposite.

Additionally, when I spoke of "free" nations needing us...." Most folks with common sense and logic would understand that no way in hell Russia would be included in that description.

Russia has been the center of your conversation with Andy. Ours was a more "worldly" discussion.
 
How many D1 sports did you play? How many D1 sports did you start in for four years? How many D1 sports have you coached? How many of your position unit players have signed NFL/CFL contracts and/or been in the top 10 in the country at their position?

Why take jabs at somebody far more successful than you in just about everything?
LOL
 
Hey Mark...I thought you banned riflearm? What's he doing posting under a new screen name?

Reminds me of this movie, when Eddie Murphy yells out, "hey boss, he ain't workin'!"

227329847-life-eddie-murphy-martin-lawrence.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Herd Fever
The Russians had already started to push back the Germans before we even joined the European Theatre.
True, but they wouldn't have done that without USA. They were getting most of their food from us, most boots/clothes from us, 3/4 of their trucks were Studebakers/Willys, and the war machines they were creating was using American Steel.

The Lend-Lease program probably had more influence on the European Front than the soldiers we sent. During WWII the US had about 50% of the worlds production potential and we took full advantage of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: andy4theherd
True, but they wouldn't have done that without USA. They were getting most of their food from us, most boots/clothes from us, 3/4 of their trucks were Studebakers/Willys, and the war machines they were creating was using American Steel.

The Lend-Lease program probably had more influence on the European Front than the soldiers we sent. During WWII the US had about 50% of the worlds production potential and we took full advantage of it.

Yup by providing for both sides
 
Two high level Swedish pols come out today in support of Trump saying Sweden is trying to cover up the crime and problems being caused by refugees and immigrants. Duh to the naysayers.
 
"Crimes against life and health in Sweden have decreased in recent years."
__from your link

you are ignoring the social-economical problem. the fact remains that nearly 60% of Swedes are more concerned about the immigration policy than ANY other factor in their daily lives.

i'm sure they are all just uneducated redneck Swedes though.
 
you are ignoring the social-economical problem. the fact remains that nearly 60% of Swedes are more concerned about the immigration policy than ANY other factor in their daily lives.

i'm sure they are all just uneducated redneck Swedes though.

And you are ignoring the fact that while all those heathen Muslims were immigrating into Sweden, the crimes did not increase. Additionally while you keep your focus on immigration, 30,000 Americans are killed per year by guns and another 10,000 by drunk drivers. But Cheetos will keep you "safe".
 
And you are ignoring the fact that while all those heathen Muslims were immigrating into Sweden, the crimes did not increase. Additionally while you keep your focus on immigration, 30,000 Americans are killed per year by guns and another 10,000 by drunk drivers. But Cheetos will keep you "safe".

it DID increase. "crime on life and health" dropped in 2013. it is still below the peak in 2011 but is trending back up. that is what has been cited everywhere. look at this line graph. even a cabinet maker should be able to see the steady increase from the 2000 to 2013. then notice it ticks right back up.

from the same link/article above:

Capture.png
 
and the number of "sex crimes reported" mirrors the above graph
To be fair to Muhammad & Friends, imagine being a refugee from a land of bearded women, and then landing in Sweden, home to some of the world's most gorgeous blondes. Not saying that has anything to do with it, but it might... I figure I would be tapping some of that stuff as well.
 
it DID increase. "crime on life and health" dropped in 2013. it is still below the peak in 2011 but is trending back up. that is what has been cited everywhere. look at this line graph. even a cabinet maker should be able to see the steady increase from the 2000 to 2013. then notice it ticks right back up.

from the same link/article above:

Capture.png

You need to spend more time analyzing your graphs before you spout off. The very year in which immigration into sweden spiked is the year that crimes per population went DOWN. Furthermore, your rape data is not a result of immigrants raping, but according to YOUR linked article, results from......."The rate of exposure to sexual offences has remained relatively unchanged, according to the SCS, since the first survey was conducted in 2006, despite an increase in the number of reported sex crimes.[34] This discrepancy can largely be explained by reforms in sex crime legislation, widening of the definition of rape,[35][36][37] and an effort by the Government to decrease the number of unreported cases". Even cabinetmakers can fact check. You should try it.
 
You need to spend more time analyzing your graphs before you spout off. The very year in which immigration into sweden spiked is the year that crimes per population went DOWN. Furthermore, your rape data is not a result of immigrants raping, but according to YOUR linked article, results from......."The rate of exposure to sexual offences has remained relatively unchanged, according to the SCS, since the first survey was conducted in 2006, despite an increase in the number of reported sex crimes.[34] This discrepancy can largely be explained by reforms in sex crime legislation, widening of the definition of rape,[35][36][37] and an effort by the Government to decrease the number of unreported cases". Even cabinetmakers can fact check. You should try it.

maybe you are looking at different graphs... it is glaringly obvious that immigration exploded in 2005 and crime followed.

Capture.png
Capture.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: HerdFan76
Moronic moron, the additional rape cases due to changes in rape laws are included in crimes per population statistics.

"crimes against life and health" are reported separately (chapter 3) than "sex crimes" (chapter 6)

also note, none of these stats or graphs contain crimes not involving "life and health" or "sex crimes". vandalism, crimes against freedom and speech, theft/robbery, crimes against public order, crimes against national security, ect

http://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/natle...nt=2911&p_classification=01.04&p_classcount=3
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT