Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
^^^^excuses for doing nothing.
There is no well regulated militia....and you're a liar.No, but evil people and the mentally ill do. Oh, and evil communist dictators and corrupt, lying government officials that you run cover for do.
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”There is no well regulated militia....and you're a liar.
There is no well regulated militia....and you're a liar.“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”
commas separate individual clauses. It is amazing how you second amendment haters always ignore the second part of the amendment, the right of the PEOPLE, you don’t need to have one in order to have e the other.
There is no well regulated militia....and you're a liar."A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined..."
- George Washington, First Annual Address, to both House of Congress, January 8, 1790
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."
- Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776
"...that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to to John Cartwright, 5 June 1824
"Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation..."
- James Madison, Federalist No. 46, January 29, 1788
"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms."
- Samuel Adams, Massachusetts Ratifying Convention, 1788
"I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers."
- George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788
That’s irrelevant. The comma separates two thoughts. The second is the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringedThere is no well regulated militia....and you're a liar.
This is the new libtard battle cry. Private citizens did own cannons during the period of our founders.There is no well regulated militia....and you're a liar.
and "shall not be infringed" does not mean it cannot be regulated.That’s irrelevant. The comma separates two thoughts. The second is the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed
As long as it’s not an infringement on the rights of the people to KEEP and BEAR armsand "shall not be infringed" does not mean it cannot be regulated.
South Carolina, Texas, Florida, and some others have State Guards that are separate from the National Guard. The National Guard can be federalized. The National Gutard is either part of the US Army or US Air Force.According to some the National Guard is the "well organized militia".
"Militia (United States) - Wikipedia" https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Militia_(United_States)
According to some the National Guard is the "well organized militia".
"Militia (United States) - Wikipedia" https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Militia_(United_States)
Yep. That was proven Jan 6.Rightnow it is one of the last things between us and tyranny
Yep. That was proven Jan 6.
You're a liar.You love Xi Jinping, Xi Jinping has gun control, you want tyranny, Xi Jinping is a tyrant, circle complete...
I own guns...I have no issue. But this isn't about "taking our guns" - it's about limiting a class of weapons similar to when automatic weapons became prohibited.Give it up . Guns are going nowhere.
I own guns...I have no issue. But this isn't about "taking our guns" - it's about limiting a class of weapons similar to when automatic weapons became prohibited.
You're a liar.
That’s fine but unless you give a very specific definition then you will end up banning other weapons. So please enlighten us on your definition of the types of weapons that should be bannedI own guns...I have no issue. But this isn't about "taking our guns" - it's about limiting a class of weapons similar to when automatic weapons became prohibited.
Is that a pic from Australia? Not relevant. I believe they took all semi-automatic guns including shotguns. Not aware of anyone proposing that....except the usual conspiracy theorists.No it's not...
You can't be this naive...
The same assault weapons banned from 1994 - 2005.That’s fine but unless you give a very specific definition then you will end up banning other weapons. So please enlighten us on your definition of the types of weapons that should be banned
Is that a pic from Australia? Not relevant. I believe they took all semi-automatic guns including shotguns. Not aware of anyone proposing that....except the usual conspiracy theorists.
Again, no one outside of conspiracy theorists are proposing "disarming".Yep.. not relevant...
These quotes from our Founding Father's must not be either...
"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops."
- Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787
Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of."
- James Madison, Federalist No. 46, January 29, 1788
I like those timeless guys having my back rather than someone as reactionary and short-sighted as you. Those guys could see the future, you can't seem to see the last century's governmental and military abuses caused by gun control...
I believe they took all semi-automatic guns including shotguns.
Again, no one outside of conspiracy theorists are proposing "disarming".
They can go to hell and I mean it. I am not giving it up. Any Republican that supports a ban can go with them. They will literally have to come and get it and it is not for sale.I own guns...I have no issue. But this isn't about "taking our guns" - it's about limiting a class of weapons similar to when automatic weapons became prohibited.
Not sure how an assault rifle would stand up to armed drones, air power and mechanized weaponry - none of which existed when the constitution was written.
Biden just said no one should have a 9mm. What assault rifle uses a 9mm round?Again, no one outside of conspiracy theorists are proposing "disarming".
Not sure how an assault rifle would stand up to armed drones, air power and mechanized weaponry - none of which existed when the constitution was written.
BTW, the US Constitution also has no explicit provision for either an Air Force or a Space Force. Both were created by an act of Congress....just like the National Guard.
What about an intratec tec dc9. And what do you do with millions already out there? Do you confiscate them? Do you buy them back? If so there will be a lot of boating accidentsThe same assault weapons banned from 1994 - 2005.
Biden just said no one should have a 9mm. What assault rifle uses a 9mm round?
We have a govt that just tried to set up a Ministry of Truth. Think about that.