Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The real issue is why did he have a non prosecution agreement with the government.
Dershowitz got named as one of the rapists in a lawsuit that was dropped. Honestly, if he didn't do it & was accused of being a rapist, I could see why the guy might be a bit touchy.
Well I guess we could give this guy the benefit of a doubt, if there’s nothing else questionabDershowitz got named as one of the rapists in a lawsuit that was dropped. Honestly, if he didn't do it & was accused of being a rapist, I could see why the guy might be a bit touchy.
I should have added that I have my suspicions about him. I view Dershowitz like Tom from the Godfather. I can’t tell if he’s dirty or if he’s just profiting off of defending notable clients accused of bad things. I was surprised when the case was droppedWell I guess we could give this guy the benefit of a doubt, if there’s nothing else questionab
Code for "if i don't change my story, i may be unalived."?Loading…
www.nytimes.com
"I now recognize I may have made a mistake in identifying Mr. Dershowitz,” her statement said."
I’m not saying that Trump did visit the island or whatever, but that doesn’t confirm that he didn’t, just that that one witness didn’t see him there. But she wasn’t there all the time. It’s an “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence” thing.
One of Clinton's longtime aides/advisors went on the record with Vanity Fair & stated Clinton visited the island as well.I’m not saying that Trump did visit the island or whatever, but that doesn’t confirm that he didn’t, just that that one witness didn’t see him there. But she wasn’t there all the time. It’s an “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence” thing.
But again I’m not saying he did visit it. Just that that conclusion doesn’t follow the document posted.
The DOJ has everything, including the tapes. Given just how far the DOJ has overreached going after the Don, if they had evidence I do believe they would have gladly leaked it by now. Remember, this is the same DOJ that had Hunter's laptop for two years & tried to cover it up.Like I said, if Trump HAD visited the island, had been banging kids, who doesn't believe his name would not have been the first one trumpeted from the mountain tops???
Liberal hopes and prayers (oh wait, liberals generally dont believe in prayers):
Dude, if they had that on Trump they would use it.I’m not saying that Trump did visit the island or whatever, but that doesn’t confirm that he didn’t, just that that one witness didn’t see him there. But she wasn’t there all the time. It’s an “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence” thing.
But again I’m not saying he did visit it. Just that that conclusion doesn’t follow the document posted.
The DOJ has everything, including the tapes. Given just how far the DOJ has overreached going after the Don, if they had evidence I do believe they would have gladly leaked it by now. Remember, this is the same DOJ that had Hunter's laptop for two years & tried to cover it up.
Can someone give me a good reason me why all that isn't being made public? Not the tapes, but the names. And blackmail isn't a good reason. They're not exactly using the evidence for prosecution.Yes.
In 2019 it was reported that they had tapes labeled *NAME (young) and *NAME* found in a safe with DVD's and pics.
They have physical evidence of trafficking yet not one single john doe has been arrested.
Can someone give me a good reason me why all that isn't being made public? Not the tapes, but the names. And blackmail isn't a good reason. They're not exactly using the evidence for prosecution.
The more that comes out, especially the NPA, the worse it looks for the intelligence agencies. If this is what they'll encourage to get info, what's the hard floor?Because he's an intelligence asset of multiple agencies, including but not limited to CIA , Mossad, and British Intelligence.
How he became a trader/investor is really shady as well. He's not some sort of expert trader or hedge fund pro. He was a construct.
Because he's an intelligence asset of multiple agencies, including but not limited to CIA , Mossad, and British Intelligence.
How he became a trader/investor is really shady as well. He's not some sort of expert trader or hedge fund pro. He was a construct.
I’m familiar with Wexner. He had loose Mossad/Israel ties as well.This is from a quick Google search but remember Epstein's relationship and funding by Les Wexman.
Jeffrey Epstein Exposed: Les Wexner and Island Manager Who Says He Saw Pedophile With Underage Girl Subpoenaed
In a civil lawsuit against JP Morgan Chase Bank, lawyers for the Virgin Islands have also issued a subpoena for Les Wexner, requesting information directly related to the billionaire businessman's work with Epstein.www.insideedition.com
Because they’re on them.Can someone give me a good reason me why all that isn't being made public? Not the tapes, but the names. And blackmail isn't a good reason. They're not exactly using the evidence for prosecution.
I agree with you, I only take issue with the idea that one person not seeing him there proves he was never there. That’s a bad take.Dude, if they had that on Trump they would use it.
I've always wondered about this. For someone supposedly adept at trading, seems like minimal vetting by "willing" investors would have prevented any of them from giving the guy their money. Especially for the type of clients he said he would only deal with - billionaires.The narrative that Epstein was a trader/hedge fund is ludicrous and hilarious at the same time. NO ONE on the street knew him for that reason.
I've always wondered about this. For someone supposedly adept at trading, seems like minimal vetting by "willing" investors would have prevented any of them from giving the guy their money. Especially for the type of clients he said he would only deal with - billionaires.
Just found this while looking in the VF archives for a completely separate article on Clinton & Epstein. Reading this article now with hindsight is disturbing.With that said, at insane levels of wealth (Wexler), it's not about making money in the market, it's about hiding it and laundering it.
It starts to get murky, but there are some loose connections with Wexner and his Mega Group co founder Bronfman….who happens s to be the dad of the leader of the NXIVM sex cult.Just found this while looking in the VF archives for a completely separate article on Clinton & Epstein. Reading this article now with hindsight is disturbing.
https://archive.vanityfair.com/article/2003/3/the-talented-mr-epstein
Wexner, through a trust, bought the town house in which Epstein now lives for a reported $13.2 million in 1989. In 1993, Wexner married Abigail Koppel, a 31-year-old lawyer, and the newlyweds relocated to Ohio; in 1996, Epstein moved into the town house. Public documents suggest that the house is still owned by the trust that bought it, but Epstein has said that he now owns the house.Wexner trusts Epstein so completely that he has assigned him the power of fiduciary over all of his private trusts and foundations, says a source close to Wexner. In 1992, Epstein even persuaded Wexner to put him on the board of the Wexner Foundation in place of Wexner's ailing mother. Bella Wexner recovered and demanded to be reinstated. Epstein has said they settled by splitting the foundation in two.