Feed the team Stewart’s Hot Dogs for dinner the night before a game and Tudors the morning of, he’ll have a full roster of explosive players
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Only time I remember a team being successful was florida. Tim Tebow and I forgot the other qbs name. But the old saying goes....if you have 2 qbs then you don't have 1. It's true about 99.99% of the time. So we definitely do not have the coaching or a qb.If that press conference doesn't concern you as a Herd Fan, I don't know what will. Either we have a coach making a bunch of excuses, or he is saying we don't have the players to compete. One way or the other it is a bad sign.
Also, I can't believe he is trying to sale a two platoon QB system. In my life I have never heard somebody use the logic and reasoning he is and be successful. Guarantee you there is player dissention on the Offensive as some will want Colombi and some will want Fancher. That is what happens when a coach doesn't have the balls to make a decision.
Best case scenario is he gets another hc job after this season (highly unlikely) or gets a coordinator job at a p5. Imo, the coordinator job would be likely because he could get a pay raise and a chance to learn how to run one side of the ball. Plus he could salvage his future aspirations of getting a big time job, because I do not see that happening here. All I see is a coach being dismissed after year 3 because he won 8 games in 2 years. Man I hope I'm wrong and he turns things around.Always remember, never forget, Huff has never stayed in one place very long. That alone is not such a big deal but add everything else into the equation and it is.
More characteristics of NPD.Not good. From what I hear, it sounds like a coach that is trying to cover up a dysfunctional program right now. I've heard all of these, what I call them, pretty or fancy talk words before as I worked as an SID at an NAIA school nearby. He mentions "protecting his players," then within minutes, says "we lack explosive players."
Also, I did not care for the sarcastic answers to the media. He is getting very easy questions to answer -- this is not Alabama, Notre Dame, Ohio State, or Tennessee where the media is on you constantly. I think Huff needs to work on a whole lot of things within his program before being sarcastic to anybody.
The Twitter talk was nauseating. For a coach who only makes his players available for interviews on Tuesdays and doesn't make them available to the media much (outside of the local TV media contingent who seemingly has free reign), he seems to care quite a bit about what is said on Twitter.
I'll leave it at this: you are only as successful as the people that you trust to do their jobs around you. I feel like he is too worried about access around the program and not enough about how guys are getting better on a day-by-day basis.
But even then Tebow was only brought in to run certain plays. He wasn't coming in at predetermined times marks in the game as Huff eluded to.Only time I remember a team being successful was florida. Tim Tebow and I forgot the other qbs name. But the old saying goes....if you have 2 qbs then you don't have 1. It's true about 99.99% of the time. So we definitely do not have the coaching or a qb.
There is no way we regress like we have after the first 2 games without poor coaching. Problem is as a G5 you have to expand and change up your playbook throughout the year. Huff screwed us because he has no connections to a good oc and chose trickett who is probably being told what to do by Legg. Not a good recipe for a position coach that gets a HC job to put another rookie at the OC spot. The DC and OC position are honestly the 2 most important jobs on the football team for x and o advantages. I run car dealerships and the first few years I had alot to learn and made more mistakes than I can count. Now in year 11 I am a problem solver. You cannot replace experience and we are really seeing that on the offensive side of the ball. Then add Legg to the equation and you have the worst offense in America.
1. Laborn is one of the top5 leading backs in the nationI think it’s interesting that he’s essentially completely blaming the record thus far on Ali’s absence given the stats thus far. If the problem is that we’re missing our starting RB why are we running the ball 53% of the time through 4 FBS games as opposed to 33% of the time through 4 FBS games last season? Not that I think our QB’s are good but they have a better passer rating than Wells did last season so far. Seems like a pretty bad idea to change the gameplan so drastically to lean towards the run without the RB who he just essentially said is the only one on the team who can score for us...
This is what you don’t understand. You don’t need explosive players to beat ND. You only need them to beat Bowling Green or Troy!!!! LolI don't agree with this comment - we seemed to have enough explosive players to beat Notre Dame without Ali. We have all the same players in the losses to Troy, BG, and UL - what's changed???
Why do you think Keaton is explosive - what have you seen from him outside of punt returns - he doesn’t get open - drops - poor blocking - poor route running - sure every receiver is wide open at some point on a play if the play isn’t designed to go that wayKeaton is pretty darn explosive. However he's out there running around wide open while Colombi is crippled with fear running backwards. You also can't complain about explosive players if all you do is throw screens to the near side of the field.
I've seen plenty of plays. How about taking an absolutely busted double pass at ND and turning into 15-20 yard run. 99.9999 times out of 10 that is a loss if yards or the WR heaves an INT.Why do you think Keaton is explosive - what have you seen from him outside of punt returns - he doesn’t get open - drops - poor blocking - poor route running - sure every receiver is wide open at some point on a play if the play isn’t designed to go that way
Says the person that doesn't understand the difference between your and you're.So you make a decision on explosiveness off a busted play that was supposed to be a pass down field that he turns into a 20 yard rush - ok - your clueless
So do you also ignore that he missed significant amounts of time due to injury. He's never been able to play an entire season.35catches 2 TDs in 3 years - that’s not explosive - I agree he is a good returner
Oh yea I wear rose colored glasses let me tell ya. Kind of hard for any player to be explosive when the QBs suck and all the OC wants to call are bubble screens.you just made my argument - you can’t keep blaming the OC - players need to execute and be consistent- take your rose colored glasses off
Yea. I didn't say any other those. We'll never know what any of our WRs can do until we get a QB that can actually play. Colombi is crippled with fear out there and Fancher's mechanics lead to pretty poor accuracy.....blah blah blah blahYou can’t make statements that a player is a game changer - game breaker - takes the top off the defense…blah blah blah . The last 3 years …results matter