Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The statement below is from the article accessed in your twitter comment. How is raising the age to begin screening from 21 to 25 not progress
The statement below is from the article accessed in your twitter comment. How is raising the age to begin screening from 21 to 25 not progress
"The ACS last updated its guideline in 2012 and recommended to start screening at age 21. In a statement, the organization explained that the decision to raise the age for cervical cancer screenings is due to new data that suggests vaccination has led to a drop in rates of precancerous cervical changes, which are the precursors to cancer."
That is the truth! A large segment of males have lost their testicles.To be fair to CNN, there's a whole bunch of men these days that appear to have a cervix
Do we really need to explain the original post?The statement below is from the article accessed in your twitter comment. How is raising the age to begin screening from 21 to 25 not progress
"The ACS last updated its guideline in 2012 and recommended to start screening at age 21. In a statement, the organization explained that the decision to raise the age for cervical cancer screenings is due to new data that suggests vaccination has led to a drop in rates of precancerous cervical changes, which are the precursors to cancer."
Well, that's one explanation for the republican Senate.That is the truth! A large segment of males have lost their testicles.
Do we really need to explain the original post?
Last time I got my physical back in April, I was ecstatic to learn from my doctor that they no longer slip the magic finger into the rump to check these now days. Maybe some still do, but mine doesn't, so I was happy to know I no longer have to pull down my britches and grab my ankles. Is the prostate specific antigen test pretty accurate? I always figured the doctor fingering you was a shot in the dark.Individuals with a prostate may want to get their PSAs done too.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is carried by both male and female and can cause cancer later in life. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends routine HPV vaccination for both males and females at age 11 or 12.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is carried by both male and female and can cause cancer later in life. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends routine HPV vaccination for both males and females at age 11 or 12.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is carried by both male and female and can cause cancer later in life. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends routine HPV vaccination for both males and females at age 11 or 12.
To be fair to CNN, there's a whole bunch of men these days that appear to have a cervix
Last time I got my physical back in April, I was ecstatic to learn from my doctor that they no longer slip the magic finger into the rump to check these now days. Maybe some still do, but mine doesn't, so I was happy to know I no longer have to pull down my britches and grab my ankles. Is the prostate specific antigen test pretty accurate? I always figured the doctor fingering you was a shot in the dark.
Do we really need to explain the original post?
PSA is actually kind of controversial...largely because many prostate cancers aren’t deadly. Most cancer societies endorse it, but it deserves a quick discussion.
Id discuss it with your real doc, not this idiot doc on the message board.
But make no mistake, only biological men (yes, that’s still a real thing) need to consider the psa test.
next time I have trouble pooping and it's not because I ate a block of cheese or nachos, then I'll let the doctor do the finger thing again. Problem being, I need to find me a short skinny doctor. My doctor over at Bronson Methodist is a big fat guy with really fat fingers, and after he tests me, I can't sit down for hours. It's truly a reamed out kind of a thing.And track and field has taught us someone can have both a cervix and balls.
Buddy of mine had a doc who would place one hand on the patient's shoulder before giving them the finger. One time my bud was in for an exam....felt the hand on the shoulder - braced himself... suddenly he noticed a second hand on the other shoulder...then insertion. The Dr. placed a surgical glove filled with sand on the other shoulder.next time I have trouble pooping and it's not because I ate a block of cheese or nachos, then I'll let the doctor do the finger thing again. Problem being, I need to find me a short skinny doctor. My doctor over at Bronson Methodist is a big fat guy with really fat fingers, and after he tests me, I can't sit down for hours. It's truly a reamed out kind of a thing.
My doctor told me they do not do that now either. No more fingering my upper deck. The last couple of times he has not checked my balls either.Last time I got my physical back in April, I was ecstatic to learn from my doctor that they no longer slip the magic finger into the rump to check these now days. Maybe some still do, but mine doesn't, so I was happy to know I no longer have to pull down my britches and grab my ankles. Is the prostate specific antigen test pretty accurate? I always figured the doctor fingering you was a shot in the dark.
Hahaaa.Buddy of mine had a doc who would place one hand on the patient's shoulder before giving them the finger. One time my bud was in for an exam....felt the hand on the shoulder - braced himself... suddenly he noticed a second hand on the other shoulder...then insertion. The Dr. placed a surgical glove filled with sand on the other shoulder.
My doctor told me they do not do that now either. No more fingering my upper deck. The last couple of times he has not checked my balls either.
I apologize. Please help me to understand what I missed.Dude, you still don't get the point of the OP.
I'm embarrassed for you at this point.
Gotcha! I hope the board rules do not eliminate folks for being dense! Who is the judge of denseness? Who would be able to post?I really don't think it would help. He has demonstrated on multiple occasions that this board and the interwebs are not really his thing.
Hahahahahahahahahahaha.My wife accuses me of being obtuse and often I am. Not always. In this situation, I'm not so sure. The language being used by the writer was technically and politically correct. He said "Individual" because there are men and women, through no fault of their own, born with ambiguous genitalia where the genitals may be incompletely developed or the baby may have characteristics of both sexes. The external sex organs may not match the internal sex organs or genetic sex. It was the author's attempt to be inclusive and not use demeaning and often misunderstood language to describe these folks. Not sure how this can be viewed as dehumanizing when, in fact, it is the exact opposite. I certainly did not get the post. I thought keeper was taking issue with the article and not poking fun at "Individual". It is not a laughing matter for folks born with this rare condition. I guess we think differently. That is a good thing. It is also a good thing to put yourself in the shoes of folks you don't agree with to understand how they arrived at their position. It is difficult to do and I certainly failed to to do it with Keeper's post. I am sorry I went off on a tangent. However, our communications, helped me to understand. That is a good thing.
Atleast you tried to explain away your ignorance of the original post.Glad you agree with me.
The world is changing sometimes for the better. Lifting folks that have been laughed at, rejected or considered "strange" is not a bad thing. Educating ourselves about the diversity of the human condition is not a bad thing at all. Most folks could care less about this topic. Ideological extremes are the culprit here. Most folks are in the middle.
It''s called a "difference of opinion". Last I checked this is allowed and encouraged under our constitution.Atleast you tried to explain away your ignorance of the original post.
It’s ok to admit you didn’t get the point of the original post.It''s called a "difference of opinion". Last I checked this is allowed and encouraged under our constitution.
I did admit it and explained it. Implying ignorance on my part is not necessary. With all the things going on in our country, COVID19, people struggling to survive, unable to buy food, pay bills, keep their homes, I guess I could not believe that folks would make an issue over a person's choice of words.It’s ok to admit you didn’t get the point of the original post.
It’s denying science and we all know how you, that’s a general you implying the left, feel about science deniersI did admit it and explained it. Implying ignorance on my part is not necessary. With all the things going on in our country, COVID19, people struggling to survive, unable to buy food, pay bills, keep their homes, I guess I could not believe that folks would make an issue over a person's choice of words.