No shit. We are also talking world wide Muslim population and where do you think the immigrants come from?Good luck.
He's busy posting charts and graphs that don't even include the United Kingdom.
No shit. We are also talking world wide Muslim population and where do you think the immigrants come from?Good luck.
He's busy posting charts and graphs that don't even include the United Kingdom.
Go ahead and wait. Tell you what. Why don't you find the info and post it.
I will use your numbers. Go aheadYou really struggle with this. You should have ran away from this thread after your first post was exposed.
You make a claim.
The evidence you make for your claim is shown to be horrible incorrect.
You then make more claims.
You are questioned on the source for those claims.
You tell others to find the source that you used.
You get laughed at.
Let me try.
Me: "Herdman has a 2" crank."
Herdman: Posts picture of his crank next to a ruler proving that it is actually 3"
Me: "Well, Herdman only has one testicle."
Herdman: "Prove it- what is your source for that info?"
Me: "Find your own damn source!"
I will use your numbers. Go ahead
Correct me if I'm wrong, but before I posted anything using a percentage of population, didn't herdman produce the original "28% of British Muslims" number, and then throw out a hypothetical "1% of all Muslims" question in order to reinforce his own opinion?
I am willing to use your numbers. Thanks.I wasn't the one who made the claim!
Let me play this game again:
Me: "Herdman's daughter is a huge slvt. She has slept with 300 guys."
Herdman: "No, she took a lie-detector test which shows that she hasn't slept with 300 guys."
Me: "Ok, then I will use your numbers to talk about how big of a slvt she is."
See, I am not the one who made the claim. You made the claim, used false numbers to defend that claim, and then put the burden on me to provide proof to support YOUR argument.
I am willing to use your numbers. Thanks.
all white guys though.Fine. Your daughter has been dicked-down by 300 guys.
Were you not being dismissive of Herdmans concerns because "only 7%...."????
That didn't answer my question, but I should have expected that.
Why? Because you never answer a question in a thread?
Just saying, your rational is to dismiss an opinion on a public policy or direction of such based on a % of population, yet....much smaller % of populations almost always control the direction or narrative of public policy, desiring their demands be met. Why is that?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but before I posted anything using a percentage of population, didn't herdman produce the original "28% of British Muslims" number, and then throw out a hypothetical "1% of all Muslims" question in order to reinforce his own opinion?
You even quoted the question I asked in one of your replies:
As I said you never "answer" a question. No surprise there.