You wonder why I won't support other Republicans. Well maybe the Indian guy.
- Thread starter i am herdman
- Start date
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1924
Also potentially 18/1505 and/or 18/1511, although there are arguments that can be made as to whether or not those apply. The first one, which could have been on multiple counts, is a slam-fvcking-dunk.
Last edited:
Well.lets start with thr blackberry thst was smashed..destruction of govt property. Hahaha
Some od.thr data was govt properly moron. Gen Powell thr outgoing Secretary even warned her about doing that. Said.it wa a bad idea.as that was govt property and records. Her staff would.wipe.them clean and then destroy them to hide what they were doing.
Smashing a phone doesn't erase email content. Idiot.
You're a liar.
Ohhh aides destroyed and magically lost govt blackberries. From cnn even
https://www.cnn.com/2015/08/19/politics/hillary-clinton-aides-phones-destroyed/index.html
A blast from the past.
No it doesn't destroy emails correct but it could be uses for evidence. Or for other electronic forensics. Like text messages amd such or other stored data.
Now it does.
For your client's sake, I hope you know more about the law you deal with than you do this subject.
a)Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.
Zero emails were marked classified.
In a 2019 report, the State Department (under your orange jesus) said none of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails were marked as classified.
The report said 38 people were responsible for 91 violations of including details that could be considered classified in their email exchanges with Clinton.
No documents included in the emails carried classified markings.
Calling out hypocrisy from Trump supporters is not "supporting Biden consistently."
You lost. Deal with it. I showed overwhelming proof of me bashing Biden.
I wasn't asking for a link to the phones being govt property, I want a link showing the phones were destroyed FOR Abedin in the context you're insinuating.
Comey's own words:
"From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification."
and,
"Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it."
You keep referencing their "markings." What they were "marked" doesn't matter. As Comey pointed out, that's not the standard under the statute in question.
Did they contain classified materials? Yes. As SoS did she "know" these emails related to classified materials? Of course she did.
In a 2019 report, the State Department (under your orange jesus) said none of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails were marked as classified.
The report said 38 people were responsible for 91 violations of including details that could be considered classified in their email exchanges with Clinton.
No documents included in the emails carried classified markings.
The report said 38 people were responsible for 91 violations of including details that could be considered classified in their email exchanges with Clinton.
No documents included in the emails carried classified markings.
Which is wholly irrelevant.
The standard is whether the emails contained "information" - not "markings" - that she knew or should have known was classified. They did. It's uncontroverted. You don't just get to invent what you think the applicable legal standard should be because that's what you want. You were 100% wrong. She absolutely violated the statute.
Now, did Comey act appropriately by exercising prosecutorial discretion in not charging her? That's another issue/question altogether.
All I know is that the Bidens had better batten down the hatches because the precedent of coming after your political opponents criminally once they are iut of office has now been set. They've opened Pandora's box, and will never be able to put the shitshow they've unleashed back in.
In a July 7, 2016, congressional hearing, Comey said he had not heard what the State Department had said about the call sheets. He explained that classified documents come with headers that give the classification level. Comey acknowledged that the documents in Clinton’s email had no headers. Asked whether the lack of a header would have told Clinton that the material was unclassified, Comey said, "That would be a reasonable inference."
First, she as the ultimate and final authority in the department of state would know what is classified or not. Just because it not marked classified doesn't mean it is not classified. She clearly broke that protocol.
If I send a private email discussing something that classified or could he deemed classified thst still makes it classified. My Gmail or Hotmail is not going to say Classified. If I discuss something around the water cooler that is breaking a NDA.
They were obviously talking about things after being read in to a program. She was the secretary of the department of state for crying out loud.
If you are read into a program you can't be sendinthst shit out on yahoo email or whatever email.
That's a clear violation of us code.
For your client's sake, I hope you know more about the law you deal with than you do this subject.
a)Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.
Zero emails were marked classified.
In a July 7, 2016, congressional hearing, Comey said he had not heard what the State Department had said about the call sheets. He explained that classified documents come with headers that give the classification level. Comey acknowledged that the documents in Clinton’s email had no headers. Asked whether the lack of a header would have told Clinton that the material was unclassified, Comey said, "That would be a reasonable inference."
Similar threads
